{"title":"Co-creation of a fit-for-purpose Feedback Toolkit for clinical clerkships.","authors":"Javiera Fuentes-Cimma, Dominique Sluijsmans, Francisca Rammsy, Ignacio Villagran, Lorena Isbej, Arnoldo Riquelme-Perez, Sylvia Heeneman","doi":"10.1080/0142159X.2026.2634062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Feedback is a powerful educational intervention in clinical education, yet its effectiveness depends on how it is integrated into teaching and learning activities. Previous studies have shown that productive feedback in clinical education relies on sociocultural factors such as a supportive feedback culture, trustworthy relationships, and student agency. Co-creation is a promising approach for designing educational interventions that are contextually relevant and aligned with the needs of teachers and students. This study aimed to advance both theoretical and practical understanding of co-creation as a design strategy in health professions education, particularly in developing productive feedback processes tailored to undergraduate clinical education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight co-creation sessions were conducted with faculty, clinical teachers, students, and researchers. The process was iterative and grounded in feedback design principles informed by the literature. Co-creation led to the development of a prototype of a Feedback Toolkit, which was piloted in two dyads of clinical-teacher students in a seven-week physiotherapy clerkship. Weekly audio diaries were collected from participants and analyzed using content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from the co-creation sessions informed the development of a Feedback Toolkit specifically designed for the clinical teacher-student dyad. The toolkit was built upon three design principles: (1) Contributes to a trustful relationship based on continuous mutual support, (2) Envisioned learning opportunities and feedback scaffolding, and (3) Plan the use of feedback. To operationalize these principles, the toolkit included practical materials such as podcasts, infographics, feedback prompts, and a Mini-CEX. The pilot study demonstrated the toolkit's usability and acceptability and highlighted its value in structuring feedback interactions. Challenges included limited time for full implementation and difficulties in providing constructive feedback.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The co-creation approach enabled the development of a fit-for-purpose feedback toolkit that aligns with the dynamic needs of clinical education. This study highlights co-creation as a feasible strategy for designing feedback processes in workplace-based learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":18643,"journal":{"name":"Medical Teacher","volume":" ","pages":"1676-1687"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2026.2634062","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Feedback is a powerful educational intervention in clinical education, yet its effectiveness depends on how it is integrated into teaching and learning activities. Previous studies have shown that productive feedback in clinical education relies on sociocultural factors such as a supportive feedback culture, trustworthy relationships, and student agency. Co-creation is a promising approach for designing educational interventions that are contextually relevant and aligned with the needs of teachers and students. This study aimed to advance both theoretical and practical understanding of co-creation as a design strategy in health professions education, particularly in developing productive feedback processes tailored to undergraduate clinical education.
Methods: Eight co-creation sessions were conducted with faculty, clinical teachers, students, and researchers. The process was iterative and grounded in feedback design principles informed by the literature. Co-creation led to the development of a prototype of a Feedback Toolkit, which was piloted in two dyads of clinical-teacher students in a seven-week physiotherapy clerkship. Weekly audio diaries were collected from participants and analyzed using content analysis.
Results: Data from the co-creation sessions informed the development of a Feedback Toolkit specifically designed for the clinical teacher-student dyad. The toolkit was built upon three design principles: (1) Contributes to a trustful relationship based on continuous mutual support, (2) Envisioned learning opportunities and feedback scaffolding, and (3) Plan the use of feedback. To operationalize these principles, the toolkit included practical materials such as podcasts, infographics, feedback prompts, and a Mini-CEX. The pilot study demonstrated the toolkit's usability and acceptability and highlighted its value in structuring feedback interactions. Challenges included limited time for full implementation and difficulties in providing constructive feedback.
Discussion: The co-creation approach enabled the development of a fit-for-purpose feedback toolkit that aligns with the dynamic needs of clinical education. This study highlights co-creation as a feasible strategy for designing feedback processes in workplace-based learning.
期刊介绍:
Medical Teacher provides accounts of new teaching methods, guidance on structuring courses and assessing achievement, and serves as a forum for communication between medical teachers and those involved in general education. In particular, the journal recognizes the problems teachers have in keeping up-to-date with the developments in educational methods that lead to more effective teaching and learning at a time when the content of the curriculum—from medical procedures to policy changes in health care provision—is also changing. The journal features reports of innovation and research in medical education, case studies, survey articles, practical guidelines, reviews of current literature and book reviews. All articles are peer reviewed.