Pilot demonstration for physician compensation incentives to improve diagnostic specificity in clinical documentation.

IF 1.9 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Diagnosis Pub Date : 2026-03-05 eCollection Date: 2026-08-01 DOI:10.1515/dx-2025-0088
David S Burstein, Nathaniel Schwartz, Abhiroop Ganguly, Michael A Hanak, Laura J Zimmermann, Ali Keshavarzian
{"title":"Pilot demonstration for physician compensation incentives to improve diagnostic specificity in clinical documentation.","authors":"David S Burstein, Nathaniel Schwartz, Abhiroop Ganguly, Michael A Hanak, Laura J Zimmermann, Ali Keshavarzian","doi":"10.1515/dx-2025-0088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Omissions in clinical documentation hinder diagnosis by obscuring important information and delaying communication among clinicians. Additionally, carefully implemented incentives can improve health care processes such as clinical documentation. Therefore, we created a pilot using $20,000 in compensation incentives to improve free text documentation for six common outpatient diagnoses (cerebrovascular accidents, chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and smoking) in an urban health system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For each diagnosis, we asked clinicians to document 2-3 pre-specified clinically significant, evidence-based details that influence diagnosis or management. We compared baseline documentation (Aug 15th-Sep 25th, 2022) with an incentivized period (Sep 26th-Dec 16th, 2022) using an unadjusted signed rank test and an adjusted generalized linear mixed model. All 32 eligible physicians and advanced practice providers participated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 693 baseline and 1,494 intervention opportunities when a diagnosis was assessed, documentation that included all clinically significant details improved from mean 32.2 % (SD 20.7) to mean 47.1 % (SD 23.6; p=0.01) and in our adjusted analysis from 35.6 to 48.2 % (p<0.001). Seven participants' documentation improved by ≥1.6 diagnoses per week.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, compensation incentives improved free text documentation of clinically significant information to improve the diagnostic process.</p>","PeriodicalId":11273,"journal":{"name":"Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":"419-429"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2025-0088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Omissions in clinical documentation hinder diagnosis by obscuring important information and delaying communication among clinicians. Additionally, carefully implemented incentives can improve health care processes such as clinical documentation. Therefore, we created a pilot using $20,000 in compensation incentives to improve free text documentation for six common outpatient diagnoses (cerebrovascular accidents, chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and smoking) in an urban health system.

Methods: For each diagnosis, we asked clinicians to document 2-3 pre-specified clinically significant, evidence-based details that influence diagnosis or management. We compared baseline documentation (Aug 15th-Sep 25th, 2022) with an incentivized period (Sep 26th-Dec 16th, 2022) using an unadjusted signed rank test and an adjusted generalized linear mixed model. All 32 eligible physicians and advanced practice providers participated.

Results: Among 693 baseline and 1,494 intervention opportunities when a diagnosis was assessed, documentation that included all clinically significant details improved from mean 32.2 % (SD 20.7) to mean 47.1 % (SD 23.6; p=0.01) and in our adjusted analysis from 35.6 to 48.2 % (p<0.001). Seven participants' documentation improved by ≥1.6 diagnoses per week.

Conclusions: In conclusion, compensation incentives improved free text documentation of clinically significant information to improve the diagnostic process.

试点示范医生补偿激励,以提高诊断特异性在临床文件。
目的:临床文献的遗漏模糊了重要信息,延迟了临床医生之间的沟通,从而阻碍了诊断。此外,精心实施的激励措施可以改善医疗保健流程,如临床记录。因此,我们创建了一个试点项目,使用20,000美元的补偿激励来改善城市卫生系统中六种常见门诊诊断(脑血管事故、慢性肾病、充血性心力衰竭、深静脉血栓形成和肺栓塞、慢性阻塞性肺病和吸烟)的免费文本文档。方法:对于每个诊断,我们要求临床医生记录2-3个预先指定的影响诊断或治疗的具有临床意义的循证细节。我们使用未调整的符号秩检验和调整的广义线性混合模型比较了基线文件(2022年8月15日至9月25日)和激励期(2022年9月26日至12月16日)。所有32名符合条件的医生和高级执业提供者参与了研究。结果:在评估诊断时的693个基线和1494个干预机会中,包括所有临床重要细节的文件从平均32.2% % (SD 20.7)提高到平均47.1% % (SD 23.6; p=0.01),在我们的调整分析中从35.6%提高到48.2% %(结论:总之,补偿激励改善了临床重要信息的自由文本记录,改善了诊断过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diagnosis
Diagnosis MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Diagnosis focuses on how diagnosis can be advanced, how it is taught, and how and why it can fail, leading to diagnostic errors. The journal welcomes both fundamental and applied works, improvement initiatives, opinions, and debates to encourage new thinking on improving this critical aspect of healthcare quality.  Topics: -Factors that promote diagnostic quality and safety -Clinical reasoning -Diagnostic errors in medicine -The factors that contribute to diagnostic error: human factors, cognitive issues, and system-related breakdowns -Improving the value of diagnosis – eliminating waste and unnecessary testing -How culture and removing blame promote awareness of diagnostic errors -Training and education related to clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills -Advances in laboratory testing and imaging that improve diagnostic capability -Local, national and international initiatives to reduce diagnostic error
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书