The risk of kidney transplant graft loss in sensitized vs. unsensitized patients is modified by prior transplant status.

Frontiers in transplantation Pub Date : 2026-02-16 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frtra.2026.1712618
A Nicholson, K Tennankore, A J Vinson
{"title":"The risk of kidney transplant graft loss in sensitized vs. unsensitized patients is modified by prior transplant status.","authors":"A Nicholson, K Tennankore, A J Vinson","doi":"10.3389/frtra.2026.1712618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A prior kidney transplant (KT) has been associated with an increased risk of graft loss following repeat transplantation. This study examined the risk of adverse posttransplant outcomes between patients with and without a prior transplant, depending on sensitization status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used propensity score matching to examine the combined exposure of sensitization status [panel-reactive antibody (PRA) 0%, >0%-80%, and >80%] and first/repeat KT as a nested variable in adults across the US [2000-2017; Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR)]. We then used multivariable Cox and logistic regression models to examine the association between the nested variable and death-censored graft loss (DCGL), all-cause graft loss (ACGL), and delayed graft function (DGF). Effect modification between PRA status (20%) and prior KT status was assessed for each outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 38,660 matched patients, DCGL (adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR) 1.56, 95% CI 1.47-1.66), ACGL (aHR 1.42, 95% CI 1.35-1.49), and DGF (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) 1.89, 95% CI 1.75-2.03) risk was highest with a prior KT and PRA >80% (vs. unsensitized transplant-naïve patients). The risk associated with increased PRA was greater in those with a prior transplant. Prior KT modified the association between increased PRA and DCGL, ACGL, and DGF (<i>p</i>-value < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prior KT status modified the association between PRA and adverse outcomes. Sensitized patients (PRA >80%) with a prior KT faced higher risks of DCGL, ACGL, and DGF compared with sensitized patients without a prior KT.</p>","PeriodicalId":519976,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in transplantation","volume":"5 ","pages":"1712618"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12950723/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frtra.2026.1712618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A prior kidney transplant (KT) has been associated with an increased risk of graft loss following repeat transplantation. This study examined the risk of adverse posttransplant outcomes between patients with and without a prior transplant, depending on sensitization status.

Methods: We used propensity score matching to examine the combined exposure of sensitization status [panel-reactive antibody (PRA) 0%, >0%-80%, and >80%] and first/repeat KT as a nested variable in adults across the US [2000-2017; Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR)]. We then used multivariable Cox and logistic regression models to examine the association between the nested variable and death-censored graft loss (DCGL), all-cause graft loss (ACGL), and delayed graft function (DGF). Effect modification between PRA status (20%) and prior KT status was assessed for each outcome.

Results: Among 38,660 matched patients, DCGL (adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR) 1.56, 95% CI 1.47-1.66), ACGL (aHR 1.42, 95% CI 1.35-1.49), and DGF (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) 1.89, 95% CI 1.75-2.03) risk was highest with a prior KT and PRA >80% (vs. unsensitized transplant-naïve patients). The risk associated with increased PRA was greater in those with a prior transplant. Prior KT modified the association between increased PRA and DCGL, ACGL, and DGF (p-value < 0.001).

Conclusion: Prior KT status modified the association between PRA and adverse outcomes. Sensitized patients (PRA >80%) with a prior KT faced higher risks of DCGL, ACGL, and DGF compared with sensitized patients without a prior KT.

致敏与未致敏患者的肾移植损失风险因既往移植状况而改变。
背景:先前的肾移植(KT)与重复移植后移植物丢失的风险增加有关。本研究根据致敏状态,检查了有和没有接受过移植的患者移植后不良预后的风险。方法:我们使用倾向评分匹配来检查敏化状态[面板反应性抗体(PRA) 0%, >0%-80%和>80%]和首次/重复KT作为巢式变量在美国成年人中的联合暴露[2000-2017;移植受者科学登记(SRTR)]。然后,我们使用多变量Cox和逻辑回归模型来检验嵌套变量与死亡审查移植损失(DCGL)、全因移植损失(ACGL)和延迟移植功能(DGF)之间的关系。对每个结果评估PRA状态(20%)和先前KT状态之间的效果改变。结果:在38660名匹配的患者中,DCGL(调整危险比(aHR) 1.56, 95% CI 1.47-1.66)、ACGL(调整危险比(aHR) 1.42, 95% CI 1.35-1.49)和DGF(调整优势比(aOR) 1.89, 95% CI 1.75-2.03)风险最高,既往KT和PRA为80%(与未致敏transplant-naïve患者相比)。有过移植史的患者PRA升高的风险更大。先前的KT修正了PRA升高与DCGL、ACGL和DGF之间的关系(p值< 0.001)。结论:既往KT状态改变了PRA与不良结局之间的关系。与没有KT史的致敏患者相比,有KT史的致敏患者(PRA >80%)发生DCGL、ACGL和DGF的风险更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书