Setting a research agenda for the use of extended reality in healthcare simulation: an Utstein style meeting.

IF 3.6 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Barry Issenberg, Doris Ostergaard, Francisco Matos, Pier Luigi Ingrassia, Kirsty Freeman, Lars Konge, Carla Sa-Couto, Gabriel Reedy
{"title":"Setting a research agenda for the use of extended reality in healthcare simulation: an Utstein style meeting.","authors":"Barry Issenberg, Doris Ostergaard, Francisco Matos, Pier Luigi Ingrassia, Kirsty Freeman, Lars Konge, Carla Sa-Couto, Gabriel Reedy","doi":"10.1186/s41077-026-00409-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND: Extended reality (XR), encompassing virtual, augmented, and mixed reality, is increasingly integrated into healthcare simulation-based education and training. While XR offers immersive, scalable, and potentially cost-effective learning environments, evidence of its educational effectiveness and implementation remains fragmented. To address this gap, an Utstein-style consensus meeting was convened to establish an international research agenda that advances the evidence-based integration of XR in healthcare education. METHODS: The meeting, held in Copenhagen, Denmark, in November 2024, brought together 24 international experts representing diverse disciplines, geographic regions, and simulation expertise. A Delphi-informed pre-meeting survey, based on a targeted review of XR-focused literature, identified key topics across five initial domains. Using an implementation science–informed approach guided by the NASSS (Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability) framework, participants engaged in structured breakout and plenary discussions to explore barriers, facilitators, and research priorities related to XR adoption and sustainability. RESULTS: Through consensus deliberation, the original five domains were refined into three overarching themes: (1) uses and adoption of XR, (2) barriers to XR adoption and implementation, and (3) facilitators of XR implementation and sustainability. Each theme comprised multiple subthemes addressing critical issues such as technological definitions, economic and infrastructure needs, human resource and faculty development, usability, educational quality, customization, and ethical considerations. Research questions within each subtheme were classified as descriptive, justificatory, or clarificatory to guide future study design and methodological rigor. CONCLUSIONS: This Utstein Style meeting represents the first international, consensus-based effort to develop a structured research agenda for XR in healthcare simulation. Informed by implementation science, particularly the NASSS framework, the resulting agenda provides a roadmap for future research, policy, and practice. It emphasizes faculty readiness, institutional investment, and data-driven evaluation as prerequisites for sustainable integration. By addressing barriers and leveraging facilitators, the healthcare simulation community can advance the responsible adoption of XR technologies, enhancing competency, equity, and innovation in health professions education worldwide. </p>","PeriodicalId":72108,"journal":{"name":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12954913/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-026-00409-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Extended reality (XR), encompassing virtual, augmented, and mixed reality, is increasingly integrated into healthcare simulation-based education and training. While XR offers immersive, scalable, and potentially cost-effective learning environments, evidence of its educational effectiveness and implementation remains fragmented. To address this gap, an Utstein-style consensus meeting was convened to establish an international research agenda that advances the evidence-based integration of XR in healthcare education. METHODS: The meeting, held in Copenhagen, Denmark, in November 2024, brought together 24 international experts representing diverse disciplines, geographic regions, and simulation expertise. A Delphi-informed pre-meeting survey, based on a targeted review of XR-focused literature, identified key topics across five initial domains. Using an implementation science–informed approach guided by the NASSS (Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability) framework, participants engaged in structured breakout and plenary discussions to explore barriers, facilitators, and research priorities related to XR adoption and sustainability. RESULTS: Through consensus deliberation, the original five domains were refined into three overarching themes: (1) uses and adoption of XR, (2) barriers to XR adoption and implementation, and (3) facilitators of XR implementation and sustainability. Each theme comprised multiple subthemes addressing critical issues such as technological definitions, economic and infrastructure needs, human resource and faculty development, usability, educational quality, customization, and ethical considerations. Research questions within each subtheme were classified as descriptive, justificatory, or clarificatory to guide future study design and methodological rigor. CONCLUSIONS: This Utstein Style meeting represents the first international, consensus-based effort to develop a structured research agenda for XR in healthcare simulation. Informed by implementation science, particularly the NASSS framework, the resulting agenda provides a roadmap for future research, policy, and practice. It emphasizes faculty readiness, institutional investment, and data-driven evaluation as prerequisites for sustainable integration. By addressing barriers and leveraging facilitators, the healthcare simulation community can advance the responsible adoption of XR technologies, enhancing competency, equity, and innovation in health professions education worldwide.

为在医疗保健模拟中使用扩展现实设置研究议程:一个Utstein风格的会议。
背景:扩展现实(XR),包括虚拟、增强和混合现实,越来越多地集成到基于医疗保健模拟的教育和培训中。虽然XR提供了身临其境、可扩展且具有潜在成本效益的学习环境,但其教育有效性和实施的证据仍然零散。为了解决这一差距,召开了一次乌斯坦式的共识会议,以建立一项国际研究议程,推动基于证据的XR在医疗保健教育中的整合。方法:该会议于2024年11月在丹麦哥本哈根举行,汇集了24位代表不同学科、地理区域和模拟专业知识的国际专家。delphi通知会前调查,基于对以xr为重点的文献的有针对性的审查,确定了五个初始领域的关键主题。在NASSS(不采用、放弃、扩大规模、传播和可持续性)框架的指导下,采用科学的实施方法,参与者进行了结构化的分组讨论和全体会议讨论,探讨与XR采用和可持续性相关的障碍、促进因素和研究重点。结果:通过共识审议,最初的五个领域被细化为三个总体主题:(1)XR的使用和采用,(2)XR采用和实施的障碍,以及(3)XR实施和可持续性的促进因素。每个主题都包含多个子主题,这些子主题涉及关键问题,如技术定义、经济和基础设施需求、人力资源和教师发展、可用性、教育质量、定制和道德考虑。每个子主题中的研究问题被分类为描述性、合理性或澄清性,以指导未来的研究设计和方法的严谨性。结论:这次Utstein风格的会议代表了第一次基于共识的国际努力,为医疗保健模拟中的XR制定了结构化的研究议程。根据实施科学,特别是NASSS框架,由此产生的议程为未来的研究、政策和实践提供了路线图。它强调教师准备、机构投资和数据驱动的评估是可持续整合的先决条件。通过解决障碍和利用促进者,医疗保健模拟社区可以推动负责任地采用XR技术,增强全球卫生专业教育的能力、公平性和创新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书