Pan CT for blunt polytrauma - Is there a need for more selective indications?

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
H A W Palmer, L Martin, D L Clarke, G V Oosthuizen
{"title":"Pan CT for blunt polytrauma - Is there a need for more selective indications?","authors":"H A W Palmer, L Martin, D L Clarke, G V Oosthuizen","doi":"10.36303/SAJS.02940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pan computed tomography (CT) has become ubiquitous in the evaluation of patients with blunt polytrauma. The indications for Pan CT were previously evaluated in our unit and judicious use was demonstrated. Since CT has become increasingly readily available, we questioned whether \"indication creep\" has occurred in our unit. We aimed to determine, based on local imaging criteria, whether Pan CT is being over-utilised within our trauma service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective review of all pan scans conducted in our unit in Pietermaritzburg, South Africa, during a 5-year period, January 2017 to December 2021. Data was analysed to determine injuries identified on Pan CT and how these findings influenced patient management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 301 pan scans, 269 (89.4%) prompted an intervention, including brain scans (47.2%), cervical spine scans (9.3%), chest scans (22.7%) and abdominal scans (20.8%). The remaining 32 pan scans (10.6%) did not influence management. Many of these \"clinically negative\" scans were clinically important, ruling out injury in patients in whom clinical assessment was regarded as unreliable: 5 patients (1.7%) were hypoxic and had to be sedated, intubated and ventilated; 8 (2.7%) had a Glasgow Coma Score < 15; and 4 (1.3%) had major distracting injuries. This left only 15 pan scans (4.98%) that were not regarded as clinically helpful.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In comparison with the results from a previous report from our unit, \"indication creep\" has not occurred. We continue to have fewer than 5% of patients who may be considered for imaging modalities other than Pan CT.</p>","PeriodicalId":51161,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Surgery","volume":"63 4","pages":"240-244"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36303/SAJS.02940","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pan computed tomography (CT) has become ubiquitous in the evaluation of patients with blunt polytrauma. The indications for Pan CT were previously evaluated in our unit and judicious use was demonstrated. Since CT has become increasingly readily available, we questioned whether "indication creep" has occurred in our unit. We aimed to determine, based on local imaging criteria, whether Pan CT is being over-utilised within our trauma service.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all pan scans conducted in our unit in Pietermaritzburg, South Africa, during a 5-year period, January 2017 to December 2021. Data was analysed to determine injuries identified on Pan CT and how these findings influenced patient management.

Results: Of 301 pan scans, 269 (89.4%) prompted an intervention, including brain scans (47.2%), cervical spine scans (9.3%), chest scans (22.7%) and abdominal scans (20.8%). The remaining 32 pan scans (10.6%) did not influence management. Many of these "clinically negative" scans were clinically important, ruling out injury in patients in whom clinical assessment was regarded as unreliable: 5 patients (1.7%) were hypoxic and had to be sedated, intubated and ventilated; 8 (2.7%) had a Glasgow Coma Score < 15; and 4 (1.3%) had major distracting injuries. This left only 15 pan scans (4.98%) that were not regarded as clinically helpful.

Conclusion: In comparison with the results from a previous report from our unit, "indication creep" has not occurred. We continue to have fewer than 5% of patients who may be considered for imaging modalities other than Pan CT.

钝性多发外伤的泛CT检查——是否需要更多的选择性适应症?
背景:计算机断层扫描(CT)在评估钝性多发外伤患者中已变得普遍。Pan CT的适应症之前在我们单位进行了评估,并证明了明智的使用。由于CT越来越容易获得,我们质疑我们的单位是否发生了“指征蠕变”。我们的目的是根据当地的成像标准,确定Pan CT在我们的创伤服务中是否被过度使用。方法:我们对2017年1月至2021年12月5年期间在南非彼得马里茨堡我们的单位进行的所有泛扫描进行了回顾性审查。分析数据以确定Pan CT识别的损伤以及这些发现如何影响患者管理。结果:301次pan扫描中,269次(89.4%)提示干预,包括脑部扫描(47.2%)、颈椎扫描(9.3%)、胸部扫描(22.7%)和腹部扫描(20.8%)。其余32次扫描(10.6%)没有影响管理。许多这些“临床阴性”扫描在临床上具有重要意义,排除了临床评估不可靠的患者的损伤:5例(1.7%)患者缺氧,必须镇静、插管和通气;8例(2.7%)格拉斯哥昏迷评分< 15;4例(1.3%)有严重的分心性损伤。这就只剩下15个pan扫描(4.98%)被认为没有临床帮助。结论:与我们单位先前报告的结果相比,未发生“适应证蠕变”。我们仍然只有不到5%的患者可以考虑采用Pan CT以外的成像方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The South African Journal of Surgery (SAJS) is a quarterly, general surgical journal. It carries research articles and letters, editorials, clinical practice and other surgical articles and personal opinion, South African health-related news, obituaries and general correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书