Microductectomy under local anaesthetic for pathological nipple discharge. Is it time to change practice?

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
A Khamajeet, F Malherbe
{"title":"Microductectomy under local anaesthetic for pathological nipple discharge. Is it time to change practice?","authors":"A Khamajeet, F Malherbe","doi":"10.36303/SAJS.02501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pathological nipple discharge (PND) is a common clinical concern that requires careful evaluation to rule out malignancy. Microductectomy is the gold-standard surgical intervention for both diagnosis and symptom relief. In most centres, it is usually performed under general anaesthesia. This study aims to assess the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of performing microductectomy under local anaesthesia without sedation, a technique adapted during the COVID-19 pandemic to address resource constraints.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted on all patients who underwent microductectomy under local anaesthesia at Groote Schuur Hospital between January 2021 and December 2022. Data were collected on demographics, imaging used, imaging findings, biopsy results, and histological diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 23 patients were included, with a median age of 55 years (interquartile range, IQR, 45-60 years). All patients presented with spontaneous nipple discharge (ND), with 75% reporting bloody ND. Dual imaging (mammography and ultrasound) was performed in 78.2% of cases, while 39.1% of patients underwent preoperative biopsy. Histology revealed intraductal papilloma in 65.2%, ductal hyperplasia in 39.1%, and ductal ectasia in 21.7% of cases. One patient (4.3%) was diagnosed with papillary ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). No invasive malignancy was detected, and no complications were reported postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Microductectomy conducted under local anaesthesia without sedation appears to be a safe, effective, and feasible method for managing PND. It benefits resource-limited settings by decreasing reliance on general anaesthesia while preserving diagnostic and therapeutic efficacy. Further prospective studies with larger sample sizes incorporating patient satisfaction, procedure duration, diagnostic yield, recurrence rates, and completeness of excision are advised to evaluate long-term outcomes and patient experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":51161,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Surgery","volume":"63 4","pages":"207-211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36303/SAJS.02501","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pathological nipple discharge (PND) is a common clinical concern that requires careful evaluation to rule out malignancy. Microductectomy is the gold-standard surgical intervention for both diagnosis and symptom relief. In most centres, it is usually performed under general anaesthesia. This study aims to assess the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of performing microductectomy under local anaesthesia without sedation, a technique adapted during the COVID-19 pandemic to address resource constraints.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on all patients who underwent microductectomy under local anaesthesia at Groote Schuur Hospital between January 2021 and December 2022. Data were collected on demographics, imaging used, imaging findings, biopsy results, and histological diagnoses.

Results: A total of 23 patients were included, with a median age of 55 years (interquartile range, IQR, 45-60 years). All patients presented with spontaneous nipple discharge (ND), with 75% reporting bloody ND. Dual imaging (mammography and ultrasound) was performed in 78.2% of cases, while 39.1% of patients underwent preoperative biopsy. Histology revealed intraductal papilloma in 65.2%, ductal hyperplasia in 39.1%, and ductal ectasia in 21.7% of cases. One patient (4.3%) was diagnosed with papillary ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). No invasive malignancy was detected, and no complications were reported postoperatively.

Conclusion: Microductectomy conducted under local anaesthesia without sedation appears to be a safe, effective, and feasible method for managing PND. It benefits resource-limited settings by decreasing reliance on general anaesthesia while preserving diagnostic and therapeutic efficacy. Further prospective studies with larger sample sizes incorporating patient satisfaction, procedure duration, diagnostic yield, recurrence rates, and completeness of excision are advised to evaluate long-term outcomes and patient experiences.

局部麻醉下微导管切除术治疗病理性乳头溢液。是时候改变做法了吗?
背景:病理性乳头溢液(PND)是一种常见的临床问题,需要仔细评估以排除恶性肿瘤。微导管切除术是诊断和缓解症状的金标准手术干预。在大多数中心,它通常在全身麻醉下进行。本研究旨在评估在局部麻醉下进行微导管切除术的可行性、有效性和安全性,这是一种在COVID-19大流行期间为解决资源限制而采用的技术。方法:回顾性分析2021年1月至2022年12月在Groote Schuur医院行局部麻醉微导管切除术的所有患者。收集了人口统计学、影像学使用、影像学发现、活检结果和组织学诊断方面的数据。结果:共纳入23例患者,中位年龄55岁(四分位数范围,IQR, 45-60岁)。所有患者均表现为自发性乳头溢液(ND),其中75%报告有血性ND。78.2%的病例进行了双重成像(乳房x线摄影和超声),而39.1%的患者进行了术前活检。组织学表现为导管内乳头状瘤占65.2%,导管增生占39.1%,导管扩张占21.7%。1例(4.3%)被诊断为乳头状导管原位癌(DCIS)。术后未发现侵袭性恶性肿瘤,无并发症报告。结论:局部麻醉下无镇静行微导管切除术是治疗PND安全、有效、可行的方法。它通过减少对全身麻醉的依赖,同时保持诊断和治疗效果,使资源有限的环境受益。建议进一步采用更大样本量的前瞻性研究,包括患者满意度、手术时间、诊断率、复发率和切除完整性,以评估长期结果和患者体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The South African Journal of Surgery (SAJS) is a quarterly, general surgical journal. It carries research articles and letters, editorials, clinical practice and other surgical articles and personal opinion, South African health-related news, obituaries and general correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书