Improving Conversational Literature Retrieval Quality via Personalized Profile-Based Re-Ranking

IF 7.7 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ShuaiYu Zhang;Huihui Shao;Zhenping Xie
{"title":"Improving Conversational Literature Retrieval Quality via Personalized Profile-Based Re-Ranking","authors":"ShuaiYu Zhang;Huihui Shao;Zhenping Xie","doi":"10.1109/JBHI.2026.3669741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Academic literature retrieval is constrained by the paradox of “information overload” versus “evidence scarcity”, a tension that deepens when researchers iteratively refine their queries in multiturn conversational settings. To address this challenge, we propose Conversational Literature Personalized Reranking (CLPR), a personalized framework that unifies dense semantic retrieval with personalized user profiling. CLPR first performs a broad high-recall retrieval to collect candidate documents, then compresses conversational history into a concise textual profile that encodes sequential continuity, immediate focus, and longterm research background via a large language model. The generated profile serves as a pseudo-query for a neural crossencoder to produce the final ranking. Cross-domain testing on the public LitSearch (computer science) benchmark confirms its robust generalization, yielding an NDCG@10 of 0.4793. On MedCorpus, a new multi-turn biomedical conversational retrieval benchmark constructed for this study, CLPR attains state-of-the-art performance with P@1 = 0.9497 and NDCG@10 = 0.9271, surpassing the strongest baseline by substantial margins. Ablation shows longterm background cues contribute most, and maintaining a short, uptodate profile across turns outperforms a static one. CLPR therefore delivers accurate, personalized literature retrieval and can accelerate evidence synthesis across scientific domains.","PeriodicalId":13073,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics","volume":"30 10","pages":"8380-8391"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11419726/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Academic literature retrieval is constrained by the paradox of “information overload” versus “evidence scarcity”, a tension that deepens when researchers iteratively refine their queries in multiturn conversational settings. To address this challenge, we propose Conversational Literature Personalized Reranking (CLPR), a personalized framework that unifies dense semantic retrieval with personalized user profiling. CLPR first performs a broad high-recall retrieval to collect candidate documents, then compresses conversational history into a concise textual profile that encodes sequential continuity, immediate focus, and longterm research background via a large language model. The generated profile serves as a pseudo-query for a neural crossencoder to produce the final ranking. Cross-domain testing on the public LitSearch (computer science) benchmark confirms its robust generalization, yielding an NDCG@10 of 0.4793. On MedCorpus, a new multi-turn biomedical conversational retrieval benchmark constructed for this study, CLPR attains state-of-the-art performance with P@1 = 0.9497 and NDCG@10 = 0.9271, surpassing the strongest baseline by substantial margins. Ablation shows longterm background cues contribute most, and maintaining a short, uptodate profile across turns outperforms a static one. CLPR therefore delivers accurate, personalized literature retrieval and can accelerate evidence synthesis across scientific domains.
基于个性化档案的重排序提高会话文献检索质量。
学术文献检索受到“信息过载”与“证据稀缺”的矛盾制约,当研究人员在多回合对话设置中迭代地改进他们的查询时,这种矛盾会加深。为了解决这一挑战,我们提出了会话文献个性化重新排序(CLPR),这是一个将密集语义检索与个性化用户分析相结合的个性化框架。CLPR首先执行广泛的高召回检索来收集候选文档,然后将会话历史压缩为简洁的文本概要,该概要通过大型语言模型对顺序连续性、即时焦点和长期研究背景进行编码。生成的配置文件用作神经交叉编码器的伪查询,以生成最终排名。在公共LitSearch(计算机科学)基准上进行的跨域测试证实了其强大的泛化,得出NDCG@10为0.4793。在MedCorpus(为本研究构建的一个新的多回合生物医学会话检索基准)上,CLPR达到了最先进的性能,P@1 = 0.9497和NDCG@10 = 0.9271,大大超过了最强基线。消融显示长期的背景线索贡献最大,在回合中保持短的、最新的轮廓比静态的要好。因此,CLPR提供准确、个性化的文献检索,并可以加速跨科学领域的证据合成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
1151
期刊介绍: IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics publishes original papers presenting recent advances where information and communication technologies intersect with health, healthcare, life sciences, and biomedicine. Topics include acquisition, transmission, storage, retrieval, management, and analysis of biomedical and health information. The journal covers applications of information technologies in healthcare, patient monitoring, preventive care, early disease diagnosis, therapy discovery, and personalized treatment protocols. It explores electronic medical and health records, clinical information systems, decision support systems, medical and biological imaging informatics, wearable systems, body area/sensor networks, and more. Integration-related topics like interoperability, evidence-based medicine, and secure patient data are also addressed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书