Outcomes after treatment with proton pump inhibitors in patients with ineffective esophageal motility: a systematic review.

Q3 Medicine
Fatima Sakr, Maryam Soheilipour, Fatemeh Maghool, Elham Tabesh, Serhat Bor, Peyman Adibi
{"title":"Outcomes after treatment with proton pump inhibitors in patients with ineffective esophageal motility: a systematic review.","authors":"Fatima Sakr, Maryam Soheilipour, Fatemeh Maghool, Elham Tabesh, Serhat Bor, Peyman Adibi","doi":"10.22037/ghfbb.v18i4.3191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in improving manometric parameters in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) diagnosed with Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>IEM represents the most common esophageal motility disorder among patients with GERD. To date, no treatment has conclusively demonstrated efficacy in restoring esophageal motor function in these individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. We conducted comprehensive searches of electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Scopus, until January 2024 to identify relevant randomized and non-randomized controlled trials. Criteria for study inclusion were based on the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 9 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising eight non-randomized controlled trials (non-RCTs) and one randomized controlled trial (RCT). Out of 305 recruited patients with a diagnosis of GERD, 185 patients matched the diagnosis of IEM with manometric studies before and after a PPI treatment. PPIs used in the studies included omeprazole, pantoprazole, lansoprazole, and rabeprazole. The duration of treatment ranged from four to twenty-four weeks. Except for one study, there was no statistically significant improvement in manometric parameters following PPI treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evidence from included studies indicates that although PPIs are effective in healing esophagitis, they do not consistently improve esophageal motility, irrespective of the PPI type, dosage, or treatment duration.</p>","PeriodicalId":12636,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology and Hepatology From Bed to Bench","volume":"18 4","pages":"380-389"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12920681/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology and Hepatology From Bed to Bench","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/ghfbb.v18i4.3191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in improving manometric parameters in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) diagnosed with Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM).

Background: IEM represents the most common esophageal motility disorder among patients with GERD. To date, no treatment has conclusively demonstrated efficacy in restoring esophageal motor function in these individuals.

Methods: This systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. We conducted comprehensive searches of electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Scopus, until January 2024 to identify relevant randomized and non-randomized controlled trials. Criteria for study inclusion were based on the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome framework.

Results: A total of 9 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising eight non-randomized controlled trials (non-RCTs) and one randomized controlled trial (RCT). Out of 305 recruited patients with a diagnosis of GERD, 185 patients matched the diagnosis of IEM with manometric studies before and after a PPI treatment. PPIs used in the studies included omeprazole, pantoprazole, lansoprazole, and rabeprazole. The duration of treatment ranged from four to twenty-four weeks. Except for one study, there was no statistically significant improvement in manometric parameters following PPI treatment.

Conclusion: Evidence from included studies indicates that although PPIs are effective in healing esophagitis, they do not consistently improve esophageal motility, irrespective of the PPI type, dosage, or treatment duration.

质子泵抑制剂治疗食道动力不良患者的疗效:一项系统综述。
目的:本系统综述评价质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)改善食管动力不良(IEM)胃食管反流病(GERD)患者血压参数的有效性。背景:IEM是胃食管反流患者中最常见的食管运动障碍。到目前为止,还没有一种治疗方法能确切地证明在这些个体中恢复食管运动功能的有效性。方法:根据PRISMA指南进行系统评价。到2024年1月,我们对PubMed、Embase和Scopus等电子数据库进行了全面检索,以确定相关的随机和非随机对照试验。纳入研究的标准基于人群、干预、比较和结果框架。结果:共有9项研究符合纳入标准,包括8项非随机对照试验(non-RCT)和1项随机对照试验(RCT)。在305名被诊断为胃食管反流的患者中,185名患者在接受PPI治疗前后的血压测量结果与IEM诊断相匹配。研究中使用的质子泵抑制剂包括奥美拉唑、泮托拉唑、兰索拉唑和雷贝拉唑。治疗时间从4周到24周不等。除一项研究外,PPI治疗后血压参数无统计学显著改善。结论:纳入研究的证据表明,尽管PPI对治疗食管炎有效,但与PPI类型、剂量或治疗时间无关,它们并不能持续改善食管运动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书