Tui Na therapy for pain and function in chronic low back pain: a systematic review.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Li Huayu, Yao Jiamin, Shi Xudong, Zhang Mengchao, Yang Shunqin
{"title":"Tui Na therapy for pain and function in chronic low back pain: a systematic review.","authors":"Li Huayu, Yao Jiamin, Shi Xudong, Zhang Mengchao, Yang Shunqin","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2025-005896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9136,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":"1289-1298"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2025-005896","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
推纳治疗慢性腰痛的疼痛和功能:系统综述。
背景:慢性腰痛(CLBP)仍然是一种普遍和衰弱的疾病,具有显著的社会和经济影响。由于药物治疗的局限性,人们越来越关注非药物治疗方法,如推拿治疗。本系统综述旨在评价推纳治疗在减轻CLBP疼痛和改善功能方面的有效性。方法:全面检索PubMed、Cochrane Library、EMBASE、Medline、Scopus、Web of Science和谷歌Scholar从成立到2025年4月30日的文献,确定随机对照试验和准实验研究,评估对慢性特异性或非特异性下腰痛(持续时间≥12周)成人(≥18岁)的推纳或Chuna干预。如果研究报告了疼痛强度和功能状态的结果,则纳入研究。使用Cochrane RoB 2.0工具评估偏倚风险,使用分级推荐评估、发展和评价(GRADE)框架评估证据质量。结果:纳入5项研究,涉及618名受试者。与对照组或常规护理相比,推纳(或Chuna)治疗显著降低了疼痛强度(平均视觉模拟量表/数值评定量表降低:2.5-3.1分)并改善了功能结果(平均Oswestry残疾指数降低:10-15分)。特异性和非特异性CLBP亚组的改善是一致的。无严重不良事件报告;轻微的副作用是罕见的和自限性的。结论:推拿加推拿治疗对成人CLBP患者疼痛和功能的改善有一定的疗效。鉴于其良好的安全性和一致的临床益处,这些疗法可以作为综合疼痛管理策略的有价值的组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: Published quarterly in print and continuously online, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care aims to connect many disciplines and specialties throughout the world by providing high quality, clinically relevant research, reviews, comment, information and news of international importance. We hold an inclusive view of supportive and palliative care research and we are able to call on expertise to critique the whole range of methodologies within the subject, including those working in transitional research, clinical trials, epidemiology, behavioural sciences, ethics and health service research. Articles with relevance to clinical practice and clinical service development will be considered for publication. In an international context, many different categories of clinician and healthcare workers do clinical work associated with palliative medicine, specialist or generalist palliative care, supportive care, psychosocial-oncology and end of life care. We wish to engage many specialties, not only those traditionally associated with supportive and palliative care. We hope to extend the readership to doctors, nurses, other healthcare workers and researchers in medical and surgical specialties, including but not limited to cardiology, gastroenterology, geriatrics, neurology, oncology, paediatrics, primary care, psychiatry, psychology, renal medicine, respiratory medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书