On flexible covariate adjustment under covariate-constrained randomization.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Clinical Trials Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-03 DOI:10.1177/17407745261423479
Bingkai Wang, Fan Li
{"title":"On flexible covariate adjustment under covariate-constrained randomization.","authors":"Bingkai Wang, Fan Li","doi":"10.1177/17407745261423479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Covariate-constrained randomization is an effective treatment allocation procedure for controlling imbalance across multiple baseline covariates in randomized trials. Motivated by the GroupPMPlus cluster randomized trial, we introduce the asymptotic theory for a broad class of estimators, known as M-estimators, under covariate-constrained randomization. Here, M-estimators refer to estimators obtained by optimizing an objective function, such as a log-likelihood function, and include commonly used methods such as analysis of covariance and linear mixed models. We show that M-estimators remain consistent in this setting but can exhibit non-Gaussian asymptotic distributions depending on the specification. Using examples of common M-estimators, we delineate conditions under which covariate-constrained randomization can be safely ignored in statistical analysis. Our results extend to stratified covariate-constrained randomization and semiparametric efficient estimators based on data-adaptive machine learning methods. We illustrate these theoretical findings using the GroupPMPlus study to evaluate the causal effect of a psychological treatment on mental health outcomes following a disaster.</p>","PeriodicalId":10685,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"282-288"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12965748/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17407745261423479","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Covariate-constrained randomization is an effective treatment allocation procedure for controlling imbalance across multiple baseline covariates in randomized trials. Motivated by the GroupPMPlus cluster randomized trial, we introduce the asymptotic theory for a broad class of estimators, known as M-estimators, under covariate-constrained randomization. Here, M-estimators refer to estimators obtained by optimizing an objective function, such as a log-likelihood function, and include commonly used methods such as analysis of covariance and linear mixed models. We show that M-estimators remain consistent in this setting but can exhibit non-Gaussian asymptotic distributions depending on the specification. Using examples of common M-estimators, we delineate conditions under which covariate-constrained randomization can be safely ignored in statistical analysis. Our results extend to stratified covariate-constrained randomization and semiparametric efficient estimators based on data-adaptive machine learning methods. We illustrate these theoretical findings using the GroupPMPlus study to evaluate the causal effect of a psychological treatment on mental health outcomes following a disaster.

协变量约束随机化下的柔性协变量调整。
协变量约束随机化是一种有效的治疗分配方法,用于控制随机试验中多个基线协变量之间的不平衡。在GroupPMPlus聚类随机试验的启发下,我们引入了协变量约束随机化下广义估计量(m -估计量)的渐近理论。这里的m估计量是指通过优化目标函数(如对数似然函数)得到的估计量,包括协方差分析、线性混合模型等常用方法。我们证明m估计量在这种情况下保持一致,但可以根据规格表现出非高斯渐近分布。利用常见的m估计量的例子,我们描述了在统计分析中可以安全地忽略协变量约束随机化的条件。我们的研究结果扩展到分层协变量约束随机化和基于数据自适应机器学习方法的半参数有效估计。我们使用GroupPMPlus研究来说明这些理论发现,以评估灾难后心理治疗对心理健康结果的因果影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Trials
Clinical Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Trials is dedicated to advancing knowledge on the design and conduct of clinical trials related research methodologies. Covering the design, conduct, analysis, synthesis and evaluation of key methodologies, the journal remains on the cusp of the latest topics, including ethics, regulation and policy impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书