[Various models of itch induction and their relationship to pain sensitivity].

Q3 Medicine
生理学报 Pub Date : 2026-02-25
Xiao-Ran Ding, Xiu-Yi Han, Hong-Wei Sun, Ya-Zhuo Kong
{"title":"[Various models of itch induction and their relationship to pain sensitivity].","authors":"Xiao-Ran Ding, Xiu-Yi Han, Hong-Wei Sun, Ya-Zhuo Kong","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pruritus, a complex multidimensional sensation accompanying diverse dermatological and systemic disorders, affects a substantial global population. Nevertheless, the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying chronic pruritus remain incompletely understood. Standardized experimental paradigms for inducing pruritus are essential for establishing a foundational understanding of chronic pruritus. This study aimed to develop a standardized laboratory protocol for pruritus induction, investigate the relationships between sensitivities to different pruritus modalities, and explore the associations of pruritus sensitivities with pain sensitivity and other somatosensory sensitivities, thereby exploring the potential neural mechanisms. This work recruited 124 healthy participants and employed three validated pruritus induction paradigms: mechanical stimulation via calibrated feather brushing, chemical stimulation via epicutaneous application of 1% histamine dihydrochloride solution, and electrically evoked pruritus using high-frequency, low-intensity transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Concurrent Quantitative Somatosensory Testing assessed subjective itch intensity and its correlation with other somatosensory profiles. All three paradigms effectively evoked significant pruritic sensations. Critically, no statistically significant differences were observed in subjective intensity ratings across the induction methods. Correlational analysis revealed significant positive associations between intensities evoked by feather brushing and histamine application, and between feather brushing and electrical stimulation. However, no significant correlation was found between histamine-evoked and electrically evoked itch intensities. This dissociation suggests both shared and distinct neural substrates mediate processing of different pruritus modalities. Furthermore, the study identified complex interactions between pruritus and other somatosensory modalities. Feather-evoked mechanical itch intensity demonstrated a significant negative correlation with mechanical pain thresholds. Similarly, histamine-evoked chemical itch intensity showed a significant negative correlation with heat pain threshold as well as heat pain tolerance thresholds. This work establishes a rigorous methodological foundation for future mechanistic research into pruritus and facilitates the development of targeted therapeutic strategies. The established paradigm in this study can serve as a core tool for objectively assessing an individual's itch sensitivity, deepen the understanding of itch perception, and act as an objective indicator for evaluating the progression of chronic itch disorders and the efficacy of their treatment in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":7134,"journal":{"name":"生理学报","volume":"78 1","pages":"221-232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"生理学报","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pruritus, a complex multidimensional sensation accompanying diverse dermatological and systemic disorders, affects a substantial global population. Nevertheless, the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying chronic pruritus remain incompletely understood. Standardized experimental paradigms for inducing pruritus are essential for establishing a foundational understanding of chronic pruritus. This study aimed to develop a standardized laboratory protocol for pruritus induction, investigate the relationships between sensitivities to different pruritus modalities, and explore the associations of pruritus sensitivities with pain sensitivity and other somatosensory sensitivities, thereby exploring the potential neural mechanisms. This work recruited 124 healthy participants and employed three validated pruritus induction paradigms: mechanical stimulation via calibrated feather brushing, chemical stimulation via epicutaneous application of 1% histamine dihydrochloride solution, and electrically evoked pruritus using high-frequency, low-intensity transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Concurrent Quantitative Somatosensory Testing assessed subjective itch intensity and its correlation with other somatosensory profiles. All three paradigms effectively evoked significant pruritic sensations. Critically, no statistically significant differences were observed in subjective intensity ratings across the induction methods. Correlational analysis revealed significant positive associations between intensities evoked by feather brushing and histamine application, and between feather brushing and electrical stimulation. However, no significant correlation was found between histamine-evoked and electrically evoked itch intensities. This dissociation suggests both shared and distinct neural substrates mediate processing of different pruritus modalities. Furthermore, the study identified complex interactions between pruritus and other somatosensory modalities. Feather-evoked mechanical itch intensity demonstrated a significant negative correlation with mechanical pain thresholds. Similarly, histamine-evoked chemical itch intensity showed a significant negative correlation with heat pain threshold as well as heat pain tolerance thresholds. This work establishes a rigorous methodological foundation for future mechanistic research into pruritus and facilitates the development of targeted therapeutic strategies. The established paradigm in this study can serve as a core tool for objectively assessing an individual's itch sensitivity, deepen the understanding of itch perception, and act as an objective indicator for evaluating the progression of chronic itch disorders and the efficacy of their treatment in clinical practice.

[各种瘙痒诱导模型及其与疼痛敏感性的关系]。
瘙痒症是一种复杂的多维感觉,伴随着各种皮肤病和全身疾病,影响着全球大量人群。然而,慢性瘙痒的病理生理机制仍不完全清楚。诱发瘙痒的标准化实验范式对于建立对慢性瘙痒的基本认识至关重要。本研究旨在制定瘙痒诱导的标准化实验室方案,探讨不同瘙痒方式的敏感性之间的关系,并探讨瘙痒敏感性与疼痛敏感性和其他体感敏感性的关联,从而探索潜在的神经机制。本研究招募了124名健康参与者,采用了三种经过验证的瘙痒诱导模式:通过校准的羽毛刷进行机械刺激,通过表皮应用1%盐酸组胺溶液进行化学刺激,以及使用高频、低强度经皮神经电刺激进行电诱发瘙痒。同时定量体感测试评估了主观瘙痒强度及其与其他体感特征的相关性。这三种范式都有效地引起了显著的瘙痒感觉。重要的是,在不同的诱导方法中,主观强度评分没有统计学上的显著差异。相关分析显示,刷毛与组胺使用、刷毛与电刺激之间存在显著正相关。然而,组胺诱发和电诱发的瘙痒强度之间没有发现显著的相关性。这种分离表明共享的和不同的神经基质介导不同的瘙痒方式的处理。此外,该研究确定了瘙痒和其他体感模式之间复杂的相互作用。羽毛诱发的机械瘙痒强度与机械疼痛阈值呈显著负相关。同样,组胺诱发的化学瘙痒强度与热痛阈值和热痛耐受阈值呈显著负相关。这项工作为未来瘙痒的机制研究奠定了严谨的方法学基础,并促进了靶向治疗策略的发展。本研究建立的范式可以作为客观评估个体瘙痒敏感性的核心工具,加深对瘙痒感知的理解,并作为临床实践中评估慢性瘙痒疾病进展及其治疗效果的客观指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
生理学报
生理学报 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4820
期刊介绍: Acta Physiologica Sinica (APS) is sponsored by the Chinese Association for Physiological Sciences and Shanghai Institutes of Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), and is published bimonthly by the Science Press, China. APS publishes original research articles in the field of physiology as well as research contributions from other biomedical disciplines and proceedings of conferences and symposia of physiological sciences. Besides “Original Research Articles”, the journal also provides columns as “Brief Review”, “Rapid Communication”, “Experimental Technique”, and “Letter to the Editor”. Articles are published in either Chinese or English according to authors’ submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书