The future of Primary Health Care in Italy: needs, concerns and aspirations of physicians in training.

IF 0.7 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Martina Consoloni, Annette Corraro, Luigi Maria Bracchitta, Barbara D'Avanzo, Alessia Antonella Galbussera, Igor Monti, Angelo Barbato, Giorgio Sessa, Arianna Giusti, Alessandro Nobili
{"title":"The future of Primary Health Care in Italy: needs, concerns and aspirations of physicians in training.","authors":"Martina Consoloni, Annette Corraro, Luigi Maria Bracchitta, Barbara D'Avanzo, Alessia Antonella Galbussera, Igor Monti, Angelo Barbato, Giorgio Sessa, Arianna Giusti, Alessandro Nobili","doi":"10.1177/09514848261427146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The COVID-19 pandemic exposed longstanding weaknesses in Italy's primary care system. In response, the country launched a reform aligned with Primary Health Care (PHC) principles, including the creation of Community Health Houses (CHH). However, little is known about how future physicians perceive their training and preparedness for this evolving landscape. <b>Purpose and research design:</b> This paper draws on a 2024 national cross-sectional exploratory survey of trainees in General Practice (GP) and Primary Care and Community Medicine (PCCM). Descriptive analysis explores trainees' motivations for choosing the GP or PCCM pathway, their perceptions of training adequacy, and their career aspirations and concerns within the context of ongoing reform. <b>Results:</b> Both groups reported gaps in training. Many GP trainees called for curricular reform and improved contractual conditions, while PCCM trainees expressed frustration with regulatory barriers preventing them from practising as GPs. Perceptions of CHH diverged: GP trainees were often sceptical, whereas PCCM trainees viewed them as coherent with their training and professional orientation. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study offers the first national evidence on how future professionals position themselves within the Italian primary reform, shedding light on the conditions influencing their engagement with change. The findings point to the need for strategies aligning training, organisational models, and regulation frameworks to support the transition to a PHC-oriented system.</p>","PeriodicalId":45801,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Management Research","volume":" ","pages":"9514848261427146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Management Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09514848261427146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic exposed longstanding weaknesses in Italy's primary care system. In response, the country launched a reform aligned with Primary Health Care (PHC) principles, including the creation of Community Health Houses (CHH). However, little is known about how future physicians perceive their training and preparedness for this evolving landscape. Purpose and research design: This paper draws on a 2024 national cross-sectional exploratory survey of trainees in General Practice (GP) and Primary Care and Community Medicine (PCCM). Descriptive analysis explores trainees' motivations for choosing the GP or PCCM pathway, their perceptions of training adequacy, and their career aspirations and concerns within the context of ongoing reform. Results: Both groups reported gaps in training. Many GP trainees called for curricular reform and improved contractual conditions, while PCCM trainees expressed frustration with regulatory barriers preventing them from practising as GPs. Perceptions of CHH diverged: GP trainees were often sceptical, whereas PCCM trainees viewed them as coherent with their training and professional orientation. Conclusions: This study offers the first national evidence on how future professionals position themselves within the Italian primary reform, shedding light on the conditions influencing their engagement with change. The findings point to the need for strategies aligning training, organisational models, and regulation frameworks to support the transition to a PHC-oriented system.

意大利初级卫生保健的未来:培训医生的需求、关切和愿望。
背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行暴露了意大利初级保健系统的长期弱点。为此,该国启动了一项符合初级卫生保健原则的改革,包括建立社区卫生院。然而,对于未来的医生如何看待他们的培训和对这种不断变化的环境的准备,人们知之甚少。目的和研究设计:本文借鉴了2024年全国全科医生(GP)和初级保健和社区医学(PCCM)培训生的横断面探索性调查。描述性分析探讨了受训者选择GP或PCCM途径的动机,他们对培训充分性的看法,以及他们在正在进行的改革背景下的职业抱负和关注点。结果:两组都报告了训练的差距。许多全科医生学员呼吁进行课程改革和改善合同条件,而PCCM学员则对阻碍他们从事全科医生执业的监管障碍表示失望。对CHH的看法存在分歧:全科医生受训者通常持怀疑态度,而PCCM受训者认为CHH与他们的培训和专业方向是一致的。结论:本研究提供了第一个关于未来专业人士如何在意大利初级改革中定位自己的国家证据,揭示了影响他们参与变革的条件。研究结果指出,需要制定协调培训、组织模式和监管框架的战略,以支持向以初级保健为导向的系统过渡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Services Management Research
Health Services Management Research HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Health Services Management Research (HSMR) is an authoritative international peer-reviewed journal which publishes theoretically and empirically rigorous research on questions of enduring interest to health-care organizations and systems throughout the world. Examining the real issues confronting health services management, it provides an independent view and cutting edge evidence-based research to guide policy-making and management decision-making. HSMR aims to be a forum serving an international community of academics and researchers on the one hand and healthcare managers, executives, policymakers and clinicians and all health professionals on the other. HSMR wants to make a substantial contribution to both research and managerial practice, with particular emphasis placed on publishing studies which offer actionable findings and on promoting knowledge mobilisation toward theoretical advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书