Oral gabapentin versus metoclopramide for prevention of intrathecal opioid-induced pruritus.

Q3 Medicine
Douaa Galal Mohammad Mohammad Ibrahim, Marina Edwar Aziz Abd El-Shahid, Manal Mohammad Kamal Shams, Heba Mahmoud Abd El-Rahman Ali
{"title":"Oral gabapentin versus metoclopramide for prevention of intrathecal opioid-induced pruritus.","authors":"Douaa Galal Mohammad Mohammad Ibrahim, Marina Edwar Aziz Abd El-Shahid, Manal Mohammad Kamal Shams, Heba Mahmoud Abd El-Rahman Ali","doi":"10.5055/jom.0928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spinal opioids are frequently coadministered with local anesthetics for analgesia, allowing the use of a lower dose of each agent, thus minimizing side effects. Most opioid-induced side effects, such as nausea, vomiting, and respiratory depression, are usually encountered with systemic use, while pruritus is more common with intrathecal or epidural administration.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the action of gabapentin versus metoclopramide in prevention of intrathecal opioid-induced pruritus.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>After ethical committee approval and informed patient' consent, this prospective randomized comparative clinical trial was conducted at Ain Shams University Hospitals on 62 adult patients undergoing elective operations under spinal anesthesia. The subjects were randomly divided into two groups: Group G (received 300 mg of oral gabapentin) and group M (received 10 mg of oral metoclopramide) 2 hours before spinal anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall incidence of pruritus in both groups was 31.5 percent (48.8 percent in group G and 45.2 percent in group M). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. As for the severity, both drugs showed low visual analog scale scores from the first hour after intrathecal fentanyl administration. Gabapentin showed more potency in decreasing the severity of pruritus as only two patients in group G needed rescue treatment compared to five patients in group M (but the difference was of no statistical significance).The overall incidence of nausea was 17.7 percent (22.58 percent in group G and 12.9 percent in group M), while the incidence of vomiting was 11.29 percent (16.13 percent in group G and 6.45 percent in group M). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Gabapentin is as effective as metoclopramide in prevention of intrathecal opioid-induced pruritus. Moreover, gabapentin proved to be slightly more effective in reducing the severity of pruritus than metoclopramide.</p>","PeriodicalId":16601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of opioid management","volume":"22 1","pages":"69-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of opioid management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5055/jom.0928","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Spinal opioids are frequently coadministered with local anesthetics for analgesia, allowing the use of a lower dose of each agent, thus minimizing side effects. Most opioid-induced side effects, such as nausea, vomiting, and respiratory depression, are usually encountered with systemic use, while pruritus is more common with intrathecal or epidural administration.

Objectives: To compare the action of gabapentin versus metoclopramide in prevention of intrathecal opioid-induced pruritus.

Study design: After ethical committee approval and informed patient' consent, this prospective randomized comparative clinical trial was conducted at Ain Shams University Hospitals on 62 adult patients undergoing elective operations under spinal anesthesia. The subjects were randomly divided into two groups: Group G (received 300 mg of oral gabapentin) and group M (received 10 mg of oral metoclopramide) 2 hours before spinal anesthesia.

Results: The overall incidence of pruritus in both groups was 31.5 percent (48.8 percent in group G and 45.2 percent in group M). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. As for the severity, both drugs showed low visual analog scale scores from the first hour after intrathecal fentanyl administration. Gabapentin showed more potency in decreasing the severity of pruritus as only two patients in group G needed rescue treatment compared to five patients in group M (but the difference was of no statistical significance).The overall incidence of nausea was 17.7 percent (22.58 percent in group G and 12.9 percent in group M), while the incidence of vomiting was 11.29 percent (16.13 percent in group G and 6.45 percent in group M). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups.

Conclusion: Gabapentin is as effective as metoclopramide in prevention of intrathecal opioid-induced pruritus. Moreover, gabapentin proved to be slightly more effective in reducing the severity of pruritus than metoclopramide.

口服加巴喷丁与甲氧氯普胺预防鞘内阿片类药物引起的瘙痒。
背景:脊柱阿片类药物通常与局麻药共同使用以进行镇痛,允许使用较低剂量的每种药物,从而最大限度地减少副作用。大多数阿片类药物引起的副作用,如恶心、呕吐和呼吸抑制,通常在全身使用时遇到,而瘙痒更常见于鞘内或硬膜外给药。目的:比较加巴喷丁与甲氧氯普胺在预防鞘内阿片类药物引起的瘙痒中的作用。研究设计:经伦理委员会批准和患者知情同意后,这项前瞻性随机对照临床试验在艾因沙姆斯大学医院进行,研究对象为62名在脊髓麻醉下接受择期手术的成年患者。将受试者随机分为两组:G组(口服加巴喷丁300 mg)和M组(口服甲氧氯普胺10 mg),脊髓麻醉前2小时。结果:两组患者瘙痒总发生率均为31.5% (G组48.8%,M组45.2%)。两组间差异无统计学意义。就严重程度而言,两种药物在鞘内给药后1小时内的视觉模拟评分均较低。加巴喷丁在减轻瘙痒严重程度方面表现出更强的效力,G组只有2例患者需要抢救治疗,而M组有5例患者需要抢救治疗(但差异无统计学意义)。恶心总发生率为17.7% (G组22.58%,M组12.9%),呕吐总发生率为11.29% (G组16.13%,M组6.45%)。两组间差异无统计学意义。结论:加巴喷丁与甲氧氯普胺预防鞘内阿片类药物性瘙痒的效果相同。此外,加巴喷丁在减轻瘙痒严重程度方面比甲氧氯普胺更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of opioid management
Journal of opioid management Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Opioid Management deals with all aspects of opioids. From basic science, pre-clinical, clinical, abuse, compliance and addiction medicine, the journal provides and unbiased forum for researchers and clinicians to explore and manage the complexities of opioid prescription.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书