Pain neuroscience education intervention for patients who experience chronic musculoskeletal pain with concurrent opioid dependence: A pilot study.

Q3 Medicine
Nicole D Windsor, Barbara S Smith
{"title":"Pain neuroscience education intervention for patients who experience chronic musculoskeletal pain with concurrent opioid dependence: A pilot study.","authors":"Nicole D Windsor, Barbara S Smith","doi":"10.5055/jom.0974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objectives were to examine changes in kinesiophobia, pain self-efficacy, and knowledge of the neurophysiology of pain. We hypothesized that implementing an adapted-pain neuroscience education (a-PNE) curriculum, as a single intervention, for patients who experience chronic musculoskeletal pain and concurrent opioid dependence, would demonstrate positive change in kinesiophobia and self-efficacy regarding pain management, which may translate to improvements in functional ability.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study used a pretest-post-test, quasi-experimental design.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A formal opioid management program (OMP) within a clinic associated with the University of Kentucky.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients actively participating in the OMP.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Pain neuroscience education.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-11, the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ), and the Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire (NPQ) were utilized during this study. Subjects completed each questionnaire at three time points: preintervention, post-intervention, and 90 days post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant interactions between groups and the three time points were found. The a-PNE group significantly improved their knowledge between pre- and post-intervention on the NPQ and PSEQ according to paired-samples t-tests. The a-PNE group scored significantly higher at post-intervention and 90-day post-intervention than the general health education control group on the NPQ according to independent-samples t-tests.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An a-PNE curriculum may be beneficial in assisting patients to understand the neurophysiology behind their pain experience. Furthermore, positive changes were noted in pain self-efficacy. The results also indicate that an a-PNE curriculum intervention was acceptable in terms of approach and understandability for the participating patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of opioid management","volume":"22 1","pages":"111-121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of opioid management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5055/jom.0974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objectives were to examine changes in kinesiophobia, pain self-efficacy, and knowledge of the neurophysiology of pain. We hypothesized that implementing an adapted-pain neuroscience education (a-PNE) curriculum, as a single intervention, for patients who experience chronic musculoskeletal pain and concurrent opioid dependence, would demonstrate positive change in kinesiophobia and self-efficacy regarding pain management, which may translate to improvements in functional ability.

Design: This study used a pretest-post-test, quasi-experimental design.

Setting: A formal opioid management program (OMP) within a clinic associated with the University of Kentucky.

Participants: Patients actively participating in the OMP.

Interventions: Pain neuroscience education.

Main outcome measures: The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-11, the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ), and the Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire (NPQ) were utilized during this study. Subjects completed each questionnaire at three time points: preintervention, post-intervention, and 90 days post-intervention.

Results: No significant interactions between groups and the three time points were found. The a-PNE group significantly improved their knowledge between pre- and post-intervention on the NPQ and PSEQ according to paired-samples t-tests. The a-PNE group scored significantly higher at post-intervention and 90-day post-intervention than the general health education control group on the NPQ according to independent-samples t-tests.

Conclusion: An a-PNE curriculum may be beneficial in assisting patients to understand the neurophysiology behind their pain experience. Furthermore, positive changes were noted in pain self-efficacy. The results also indicate that an a-PNE curriculum intervention was acceptable in terms of approach and understandability for the participating patients.

慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛并发阿片类药物依赖患者的疼痛神经科学教育干预:一项初步研究。
目的:目的是检查运动恐惧症、疼痛自我效能和疼痛神经生理学知识的变化。我们假设实施适应性疼痛神经科学教育(a- pne)课程,作为对慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛和并发阿片类药物依赖的患者的单一干预,将在疼痛管理方面显示出运动恐惧症和自我效能的积极变化,这可能转化为功能能力的改善。设计:本研究采用前测后测、准实验设计。背景:肯塔基大学附属诊所内的正式阿片类药物管理项目(OMP)。参与者:积极参与OMP的患者。干预措施:疼痛神经科学教育。主要观察指标:采用坦帕运动恐惧症-11量表、疼痛自我效能问卷(PSEQ)和疼痛神经生理学问卷(NPQ)。受试者在干预前、干预后和干预后90天三个时间点完成问卷。结果:3个时间点组间无明显交互作用。配对样本t检验显示,a-PNE组在干预前和干预后对NPQ和PSEQ的认知显著提高。独立样本t检验显示,a-PNE组在干预后和干预后90天的NPQ得分显著高于普通健康教育对照组。结论:a-PNE课程可能有助于帮助患者了解其疼痛经历背后的神经生理学。此外,疼痛自我效能感也出现了积极的变化。结果还表明,就方法和可理解性而言,a-PNE课程干预对参与患者是可接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of opioid management
Journal of opioid management Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Opioid Management deals with all aspects of opioids. From basic science, pre-clinical, clinical, abuse, compliance and addiction medicine, the journal provides and unbiased forum for researchers and clinicians to explore and manage the complexities of opioid prescription.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书