ZIP code-level alcohol outlet density and nonfatal overdose among people who inject drugs in 22 US metropolitan statistical areas: a multilevel modeling analysis.
Snigdha R Peddireddy, Stephanie Beane, Courtney Yarbrough, Umedjon Ibragimov, Janet R Cummings, Danielle F Haley, Sabriya L Linton, Hannah L F Cooper
{"title":"ZIP code-level alcohol outlet density and nonfatal overdose among people who inject drugs in 22 US metropolitan statistical areas: a multilevel modeling analysis.","authors":"Snigdha R Peddireddy, Stephanie Beane, Courtney Yarbrough, Umedjon Ibragimov, Janet R Cummings, Danielle F Haley, Sabriya L Linton, Hannah L F Cooper","doi":"10.1186/s12954-026-01414-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND: Alcohol outlet density (AOD) is associated with drinking behaviors and related harms across several populations. As alcohol consumption compounds the depressive effects of opioids to increase overdose risk among people who inject drugs (PWID), this study investigated (1) whether off-premise AOD is associated with the risk of nonfatal overdose among a large sample of PWID, and (2) whether this relationship varies by individual race/ethnicity. METHODS: We linked individual-level 2018 National HIV Behavioral Surveillance (NHBS) data with ZIP code-level data on off-premise AOD in 2016 from the US Census Bureau’s ZIP Code Business Pattern survey. NHBS surveys PWID across 22 metropolitan statistical areas (i.e., urban cores and surrounding counties with ≥ 50,000 residents, defined by commuting patterns) using respondent-driven sampling. Hierarchical generalized linear models quantified the association between AOD and nonfatal overdose, overall and by PWID race/ethnicity. RESULTS: The sample comprised 9,764 PWID who used opioids, 45% of whom were non-Hispanic/Latine White, 38% non-Hispanic/Latine Black, and 18% Hispanic/Latine. Over a quarter (28%) experienced an overdose in the past year. The median outlet density was 4.0 outlets per square mile. The adjusted model did not show a significant relationship between AOD and odds of overdose (OR: 1.01, 95% CI 1.00–1.02), and the relationship remained null in the race/ethnicity interaction model. CONCLUSIONS: Regulating AOD alone may not effectively mitigate overdose risk among PWID. Future research should explore why overdoses among PWID are not sensitive to changes in AOD. Possible explanations to consider are whether (1) AOD is unassociated with alcohol consumption among PWID, or (2) PWID stagger the timing of their alcohol consumption so it does not coincide with opioid consumption.</p>","PeriodicalId":12922,"journal":{"name":"Harm Reduction Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13020277/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harm Reduction Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-026-01414-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Alcohol outlet density (AOD) is associated with drinking behaviors and related harms across several populations. As alcohol consumption compounds the depressive effects of opioids to increase overdose risk among people who inject drugs (PWID), this study investigated (1) whether off-premise AOD is associated with the risk of nonfatal overdose among a large sample of PWID, and (2) whether this relationship varies by individual race/ethnicity. METHODS: We linked individual-level 2018 National HIV Behavioral Surveillance (NHBS) data with ZIP code-level data on off-premise AOD in 2016 from the US Census Bureau’s ZIP Code Business Pattern survey. NHBS surveys PWID across 22 metropolitan statistical areas (i.e., urban cores and surrounding counties with ≥ 50,000 residents, defined by commuting patterns) using respondent-driven sampling. Hierarchical generalized linear models quantified the association between AOD and nonfatal overdose, overall and by PWID race/ethnicity. RESULTS: The sample comprised 9,764 PWID who used opioids, 45% of whom were non-Hispanic/Latine White, 38% non-Hispanic/Latine Black, and 18% Hispanic/Latine. Over a quarter (28%) experienced an overdose in the past year. The median outlet density was 4.0 outlets per square mile. The adjusted model did not show a significant relationship between AOD and odds of overdose (OR: 1.01, 95% CI 1.00–1.02), and the relationship remained null in the race/ethnicity interaction model. CONCLUSIONS: Regulating AOD alone may not effectively mitigate overdose risk among PWID. Future research should explore why overdoses among PWID are not sensitive to changes in AOD. Possible explanations to consider are whether (1) AOD is unassociated with alcohol consumption among PWID, or (2) PWID stagger the timing of their alcohol consumption so it does not coincide with opioid consumption.
背景:在几个人群中,酒精出口密度(AOD)与饮酒行为和相关危害有关。由于酒精消费会使阿片类药物的抑郁作用复杂化,从而增加注射毒品(PWID)的过量风险,因此本研究调查了(1)在大量PWID样本中,场外AOD是否与非致命性过量风险相关,以及(2)这种关系是否因种族/民族而异。方法:我们将2018年个人层面的国家艾滋病毒行为监测(NHBS)数据与2016年美国人口普查局邮政编码商业模式调查中邮政编码层面的非本地AOD数据联系起来。国家卫生统计局使用受访者驱动抽样调查了22个大都市统计区(即城市核心和周边县,按通勤模式定义的居民≥5万人)的PWID。分层广义线性模型量化了AOD与非致死性用药过量之间的关系,总体上和按PWID种族/民族划分。结果:样本包括9764名使用阿片类药物的PWID,其中45%为非西班牙裔/拉丁裔白人,38%为非西班牙裔/拉丁裔黑人,18%为西班牙裔/拉丁裔。超过四分之一(28%)的人在过去一年中服用过量。出口密度中位数为每平方英里4.0个。调整后的模型未显示AOD与过量用药几率之间存在显著关系(OR: 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.02),在种族/民族相互作用模型中,这种关系仍然为零。结论:单独调节AOD不能有效降低PWID患者的用药过量风险。未来的研究应该探讨为什么PWID的过量用药对AOD的变化不敏感。需要考虑的可能的解释是:(1)AOD与PWID中饮酒无关,或者(2)PWID混淆了饮酒的时间,因此与阿片类药物的摄入不一致。
期刊介绍:
Harm Reduction Journal is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal whose focus is on the prevalent patterns of psychoactive drug use, the public policies meant to control them, and the search for effective methods of reducing the adverse medical, public health, and social consequences associated with both drugs and drug policies. We define "harm reduction" as "policies and programs which aim to reduce the health, social, and economic costs of legal and illegal psychoactive drug use without necessarily reducing drug consumption". We are especially interested in studies of the evolving patterns of drug use around the world, their implications for the spread of HIV/AIDS and other blood-borne pathogens.