Views on outpatient paracentesis and GnRH antagonists for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a qualitative study of patients and healthcare professionals.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Elizabeth Lumley, Alicia O'Cathain, Katie Ridsdale, Sarah Drabble, David White, Clare Pye, Jessica Wright, Andrew Drakeley, Ying Cheong, Raj Mathur, Amy Barr, Mostafa Metwally
{"title":"Views on outpatient paracentesis and GnRH antagonists for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a qualitative study of patients and healthcare professionals.","authors":"Elizabeth Lumley, Alicia O'Cathain, Katie Ridsdale, Sarah Drabble, David White, Clare Pye, Jessica Wright, Andrew Drakeley, Ying Cheong, Raj Mathur, Amy Barr, Mostafa Metwally","doi":"10.3310/GJMM2923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome is a significant complication of fertility treatment, where the ovaries become enlarged if they are overstimulated, resulting in fluid leakage. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome can be classified as mild, moderate or severe. Symptoms vary dependent on severity but can include abdominal swelling, pain, nausea and vomiting, and shortness of breath. Treatment typically consists of monitoring initially, with active intervention if the condition progresses to a severe state, requiring hospitalisation. This study explored the acceptability and feasibility of outpatient paracentesis, and of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists, as early interventions for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals from fertility clinics (<i>n</i> = 8) and patients who had experienced ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (<i>n</i> = 10) across six United Kingdom fertility clinics. Interviews explored views on the proposed treatment protocols, and potential barriers and facilitators to randomised controlled trials evaluating these treatments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both healthcare professionals and patients were supportive of the proposed trials. Key findings included that healthcare professionals recommended clarity on patient eligibility, hospitalisation criteria and consent procedures. Patients expressed a desire to be given more detailed information about potential trials and had mixed opinions on self-monitoring. There were some concerns from both parties about treatment risks, particularly the paracentesis. Healthcare professionals noted a shift to more preventative practice due to the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Outpatient paracentesis and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists were perceived as promising interventions. Potential concerns and recommendations around both acceptability and feasibility were raised, which were used to refine the treatment protocols for the Shaping and Trialling Outpatient Protocols for Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome trial.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme as award number NIHR128137.</p>","PeriodicalId":12898,"journal":{"name":"Health technology assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12968949/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health technology assessment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/GJMM2923","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome is a significant complication of fertility treatment, where the ovaries become enlarged if they are overstimulated, resulting in fluid leakage. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome can be classified as mild, moderate or severe. Symptoms vary dependent on severity but can include abdominal swelling, pain, nausea and vomiting, and shortness of breath. Treatment typically consists of monitoring initially, with active intervention if the condition progresses to a severe state, requiring hospitalisation. This study explored the acceptability and feasibility of outpatient paracentesis, and of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists, as early interventions for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

Methods: We conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals from fertility clinics (n = 8) and patients who had experienced ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (n = 10) across six United Kingdom fertility clinics. Interviews explored views on the proposed treatment protocols, and potential barriers and facilitators to randomised controlled trials evaluating these treatments.

Results: Both healthcare professionals and patients were supportive of the proposed trials. Key findings included that healthcare professionals recommended clarity on patient eligibility, hospitalisation criteria and consent procedures. Patients expressed a desire to be given more detailed information about potential trials and had mixed opinions on self-monitoring. There were some concerns from both parties about treatment risks, particularly the paracentesis. Healthcare professionals noted a shift to more preventative practice due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Conclusions: Outpatient paracentesis and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists were perceived as promising interventions. Potential concerns and recommendations around both acceptability and feasibility were raised, which were used to refine the treatment protocols for the Shaping and Trialling Outpatient Protocols for Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome trial.

Funding: This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme as award number NIHR128137.

对卵巢过度刺激综合征的门诊穿刺和GnRH拮抗剂的看法:对患者和医护人员的定性研究。
背景:卵巢过度刺激综合征是生育治疗的重要并发症,卵巢受到过度刺激而变大,导致液体渗漏。卵巢过度刺激综合征可分为轻度、中度和重度。症状因严重程度而异,但可包括腹部肿胀、疼痛、恶心和呕吐以及呼吸短促。治疗通常包括最初的监测,如果病情发展到需要住院治疗的严重状态,则进行积极干预。本研究探讨门诊穿刺术和促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂作为卵巢过度刺激综合征早期干预措施的可接受性和可行性。方法:我们对来自英国6家生育诊所的医疗保健专业人员(n = 8)和经历过卵巢过度刺激综合征的患者(n = 10)进行了定性半结构化访谈。访谈探讨了对拟议治疗方案的看法,以及评估这些治疗的随机对照试验的潜在障碍和促进因素。结果:医疗保健专业人员和患者都支持拟议的试验。主要调查结果包括,保健专业人员建议明确患者资格、住院标准和同意程序。患者表示希望获得有关潜在试验的更详细信息,并对自我监测持不同意见。双方都担心治疗风险,尤其是穿刺术。医疗保健专业人士指出,由于COVID-19大流行,他们转向了更多的预防措施。结论:门诊穿刺术和促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂被认为是有希望的干预措施。提出了可接受性和可行性方面的潜在问题和建议,用于完善卵巢过度刺激综合征门诊治疗方案的制定和试验。资助:本文介绍了由国家卫生与保健研究所(NIHR)卫生技术评估计划资助的独立研究,奖励号为NIHR128137。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health technology assessment
Health technology assessment 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Technology Assessment (HTA) publishes research information on the effectiveness, costs and broader impact of health technologies for those who use, manage and provide care in the NHS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书