Philippe Van de Perre, Nicolas Meda, Souleymane Tassembedo, Jean Pierre Moles, Chipepo Kankasa, Anais Mennecier, Mwiya Mwiya, Nicolas Nagot, Thorkild Tylleskär
{"title":"Oral Lamivudine for Extended HIV Postnatal Prophylaxis.","authors":"Philippe Van de Perre, Nicolas Meda, Souleymane Tassembedo, Jean Pierre Moles, Chipepo Kankasa, Anais Mennecier, Mwiya Mwiya, Nicolas Nagot, Thorkild Tylleskär","doi":"10.1007/s40272-026-00745-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite considerable progress in preventing mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), eliminating paediatric HIV has not been achieved. Extended postnatal prophylaxis (ePNP), defined as prophylaxis administered to an HIV-exposed child after PMTCT perinatal prophylaxis ends, has been evaluated and is now proposed as an improved approach towards elimination. This approach should be urgently incorporated into international PMTCT recommendations. The antiretroviral drugs most commonly studied as ePNP, either alone or in combination, are lamivudine, nevirapine, lopinavir/ritonavir and zidovudine. In this study, we examined the efficacy, safety, pharmacology, genetic barrier to resistance and practicality of various ePNP regimens. Regimens combining multiple antiretroviral drugs are no more effective than single-drug regimens in terms of protective efficacy but they are associated with increased toxicity. On the basis of these criteria, we recommend lamivudine as the preferred ePNP drug or nevirapine as an alternative. Guided by maternal HIV viral load, ePNP may be particularly indicated, as it could ensure that the prophylaxis provides the greatest benefit/risk to children at highest risk. Long-acting injectable antiretroviral drugs and broadly neutralising antibodies (bNAbs) have yet to be fully evaluated in neonates, infants and children; however, they may offer new alternatives in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":19955,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"229-238"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13121178/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40272-026-00745-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Despite considerable progress in preventing mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), eliminating paediatric HIV has not been achieved. Extended postnatal prophylaxis (ePNP), defined as prophylaxis administered to an HIV-exposed child after PMTCT perinatal prophylaxis ends, has been evaluated and is now proposed as an improved approach towards elimination. This approach should be urgently incorporated into international PMTCT recommendations. The antiretroviral drugs most commonly studied as ePNP, either alone or in combination, are lamivudine, nevirapine, lopinavir/ritonavir and zidovudine. In this study, we examined the efficacy, safety, pharmacology, genetic barrier to resistance and practicality of various ePNP regimens. Regimens combining multiple antiretroviral drugs are no more effective than single-drug regimens in terms of protective efficacy but they are associated with increased toxicity. On the basis of these criteria, we recommend lamivudine as the preferred ePNP drug or nevirapine as an alternative. Guided by maternal HIV viral load, ePNP may be particularly indicated, as it could ensure that the prophylaxis provides the greatest benefit/risk to children at highest risk. Long-acting injectable antiretroviral drugs and broadly neutralising antibodies (bNAbs) have yet to be fully evaluated in neonates, infants and children; however, they may offer new alternatives in the future.
期刊介绍:
Pediatric Drugs promotes the optimization and advancement of all aspects of pharmacotherapy for healthcare professionals interested in pediatric drug therapy (including vaccines). The program of review and original research articles provides healthcare decision makers with clinically applicable knowledge on issues relevant to drug therapy in all areas of neonatology and the care of children and adolescents. The Journal includes:
-overviews of contentious or emerging issues.
-comprehensive narrative reviews of topics relating to the effective and safe management of drug therapy through all stages of pediatric development.
-practical reviews covering optimum drug management of specific clinical situations.
-systematic reviews that collate empirical evidence to answer a specific research question, using explicit, systematic methods as outlined by the PRISMA statement.
-Adis Drug Reviews of the properties and place in therapy of both newer and established drugs in the pediatric population.
-original research articles reporting the results of well-designed studies with a strong link to clinical practice, such as clinical pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies, clinical trials, meta-analyses, outcomes research, and pharmacoeconomic and pharmacoepidemiological studies.
Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in Pediatric Drugs may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.