{"title":"Neurodevelopmental Care Utilization among Preterm Infants in the Military Health Care System.","authors":"Amanda Banaag, Zachary Weber, Caitlin Drumm, Genesis James, Tracey Koehlmoos, Rasheda Vereen","doi":"10.1055/a-2817-3566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate variation in neurodevelopmental care utilization in the Military Health System (MHS) for preterm infants.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of infants born preterm within the MHS from 2017 to 2021. Preterm birth was categorized as extreme preterm, very preterm, moderate preterm, late preterm, or unknown. Patient demographics were extracted. The primary outcome was the use of neurodevelopmental care within 2 years of birth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with late preterm births, total use of specialty care was significantly higher (<i>p</i> < 0.05) in moderate, very, and extreme preterm births. Black infants had fewer total visits than White infants (-1.54, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Disparities by region of birth were noted, with lower utilization in the Pacific and West South-Central census divisions (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are differences in neurodevelopmental care utilization among preterm infants in the MHS, driven by gestational age, race, and geography. These findings support the need for a standardized policy on neurodevelopmental follow-up.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· Neurodevelopmental utilization varies by sociodemographic factors.. · Despite universal access to care, neurodevelopmental care utilization varies in the military health care system.. · Standardized neurodevelopmental follow-up is needed to ensure equitable access to care..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":"1739-1745"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2817-3566","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to evaluate variation in neurodevelopmental care utilization in the Military Health System (MHS) for preterm infants.
Study design: Retrospective cohort study of infants born preterm within the MHS from 2017 to 2021. Preterm birth was categorized as extreme preterm, very preterm, moderate preterm, late preterm, or unknown. Patient demographics were extracted. The primary outcome was the use of neurodevelopmental care within 2 years of birth.
Results: Compared with late preterm births, total use of specialty care was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in moderate, very, and extreme preterm births. Black infants had fewer total visits than White infants (-1.54, p < 0.05). Disparities by region of birth were noted, with lower utilization in the Pacific and West South-Central census divisions (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: There are differences in neurodevelopmental care utilization among preterm infants in the MHS, driven by gestational age, race, and geography. These findings support the need for a standardized policy on neurodevelopmental follow-up.
Key points: · Neurodevelopmental utilization varies by sociodemographic factors.. · Despite universal access to care, neurodevelopmental care utilization varies in the military health care system.. · Standardized neurodevelopmental follow-up is needed to ensure equitable access to care..
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields.
The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field.
All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication.
The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.