Anterior Placentation as a Risk Factor for Hemorrhage at the Time of Primary Cesarean Delivery.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
American journal of perinatology Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-02 DOI:10.1055/a-2823-4753
Tess E K Cersonsky, Camila Cabrera, Elizabeth Cochrane, Henri M Rosenberg, Sara Edwards, Angela Bianco, Luciana A Vieira, Chelsea A Debolt
{"title":"Anterior Placentation as a Risk Factor for Hemorrhage at the Time of Primary Cesarean Delivery.","authors":"Tess E K Cersonsky, Camila Cabrera, Elizabeth Cochrane, Henri M Rosenberg, Sara Edwards, Angela Bianco, Luciana A Vieira, Chelsea A Debolt","doi":"10.1055/a-2823-4753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Anterior placentation is a risk factor for hemorrhage during cesarean delivery in patients with a resolved placenta previa or low-lying placenta. As anterior placentas are sometimes incised at the time of hysterotomy, it is possible that, even in the absence of low-lying placenta or placenta previa, anterior placentation may be associated with higher blood loss at the time of nonlaboring, primary cesarean delivery. Therefore, we sought to identify if there is an association between anterior placentation and peripartum hemorrhage (PPH) in parturients undergoing primary cesarean delivery.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study that included parturients from a tertiary care center who underwent primary cesarean delivery from 2016 to 2022. Patients with known risk factors for PPH (known placenta accreta spectrum, placenta previa, etc.) were excluded from primary analyses. Primary analyses assessed the association via logistic regression between PPH (defined as estimated blood loss [EBL] ≥ 1,000 mL) and anterior placentation. We then assessed if this risk was present in higher risk subgroups (patients using anticoagulation at the time of delivery and patients who underwent vaginal trial of labor prior to primary cesarean) and a lower risk subgroup (those undergoing nonlaboring primary cesarean).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary cohort consisted of 996 parturients. Of those, 501 had an anterior placenta. Odds ratio of EBL ≥ 1,000 according to anterior placentation was 1.12 (95% confidence interval: 0.80-1.56) in multivariate regression. Risk of PPH was not associated with anterior placentation in higher- and lower-risk subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anterior placentation alone is not associated with higher EBL in patients undergoing primary cesarean delivery, even in patients using anticoagulation or those requiring intrapartum cesarean.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· Anterior placenta and previa increase hemorrhage risk.. · Anterior placentation alone does not increase hemorrhage risk.. · The risk is not increased among those with additional risk factors.. · Placenta location may impact hemorrhage risk..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":"1746-1752"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2823-4753","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Anterior placentation is a risk factor for hemorrhage during cesarean delivery in patients with a resolved placenta previa or low-lying placenta. As anterior placentas are sometimes incised at the time of hysterotomy, it is possible that, even in the absence of low-lying placenta or placenta previa, anterior placentation may be associated with higher blood loss at the time of nonlaboring, primary cesarean delivery. Therefore, we sought to identify if there is an association between anterior placentation and peripartum hemorrhage (PPH) in parturients undergoing primary cesarean delivery.

Study design: This is a retrospective cohort study that included parturients from a tertiary care center who underwent primary cesarean delivery from 2016 to 2022. Patients with known risk factors for PPH (known placenta accreta spectrum, placenta previa, etc.) were excluded from primary analyses. Primary analyses assessed the association via logistic regression between PPH (defined as estimated blood loss [EBL] ≥ 1,000 mL) and anterior placentation. We then assessed if this risk was present in higher risk subgroups (patients using anticoagulation at the time of delivery and patients who underwent vaginal trial of labor prior to primary cesarean) and a lower risk subgroup (those undergoing nonlaboring primary cesarean).

Results: The primary cohort consisted of 996 parturients. Of those, 501 had an anterior placenta. Odds ratio of EBL ≥ 1,000 according to anterior placentation was 1.12 (95% confidence interval: 0.80-1.56) in multivariate regression. Risk of PPH was not associated with anterior placentation in higher- and lower-risk subgroups.

Conclusion: Anterior placentation alone is not associated with higher EBL in patients undergoing primary cesarean delivery, even in patients using anticoagulation or those requiring intrapartum cesarean.

Key points: · Anterior placenta and previa increase hemorrhage risk.. · Anterior placentation alone does not increase hemorrhage risk.. · The risk is not increased among those with additional risk factors.. · Placenta location may impact hemorrhage risk..

剖宫产早期出血的危险因素:前胎盘。
目的:前胎盘是剖宫产时前置胎盘溶解或低胎盘出血的危险因素。由于前胎盘有时在剖宫产时被切开,因此,即使在没有低胎盘或前置胎盘的情况下,前胎盘也可能与非产程、初次剖宫产时较高的出血量有关。因此,我们试图确定是否有前胎盘和围产期出血(PPH)之间的关联,在初次剖宫产分娩的产妇。研究设计:这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了2016年至2022年在三级保健中心接受初次剖宫产分娩的产妇。已知PPH危险因素(已知胎盘增生谱、前置胎盘等)的患者被排除在初步分析之外。初步分析通过逻辑回归评估PPH(定义为估计失血量bbb1000cc)与前胎盘之间的关联。然后,我们评估了这种风险是否存在于高风险亚组(分娩时使用抗凝剂的患者和初次剖宫产前接受阴道分娩试验的患者)和低风险亚组(接受非分娩性初次剖宫产的患者)中。结果:主要队列包括996名产妇。其中501人有前胎盘。在多因素回归中,前胎盘的EBL bbb1000的优势比(OR)为1.12 (95% CI 0.80 ~ 1.56)。在高风险和低风险亚组中,PPH的风险与前胎盘无关。结论:单纯前胎盘与初次剖宫产患者较高的EBL无关,即使在使用抗凝或需要产时剖宫产的患者中也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书