Co-designing a research agenda for UK agroforestry using a multi-actor approach

IF 8.2 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Amelia S. C. Hood, Rosy E. Scholes, Erika Degani, Tom Staton, Alexa Varah, Kate Beauchamp, Alice Broome, Paul Burgess, Helen Chesshire, Edward P. Colbert, Emma Loder-Symonds, James Ramskir-Gardiner, Ann C. Rayner, Colin Tosh, Alice L. Mauchline, Rosemary Venn
{"title":"Co-designing a research agenda for UK agroforestry using a multi-actor approach","authors":"Amelia S. C. Hood,&nbsp;Rosy E. Scholes,&nbsp;Erika Degani,&nbsp;Tom Staton,&nbsp;Alexa Varah,&nbsp;Kate Beauchamp,&nbsp;Alice Broome,&nbsp;Paul Burgess,&nbsp;Helen Chesshire,&nbsp;Edward P. Colbert,&nbsp;Emma Loder-Symonds,&nbsp;James Ramskir-Gardiner,&nbsp;Ann C. Rayner,&nbsp;Colin Tosh,&nbsp;Alice L. Mauchline,&nbsp;Rosemary Venn","doi":"10.1007/s13593-026-01089-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There is growing recognition of agroforestry’s potential to help mitigate and provide resilience to the climate and biodiversity crises. Beyond its environmental benefits, agroforestry can also enhance production and profits, making it a sustainable farming solution that is scalable. Despite this, uptake within Europe is low, and many knowledge gaps remain that need to be addressed to promote adoption and optimize the management and implementation of agroforestry systems. We co-developed a research agenda for agroforestry using a multi-actor approach and a modified Delphi method in 2023. 156 UK-based stakeholders contributed to this process, including farmers, advisors, policy makers, NGOs, and researchers. An initial list of 238 research priorities (high-priority research questions) was submitted via a survey and a workshop. This was shortened during a second workshop with 48 participants. The final list included 40 research priorities across the themes “environment and production,” “human livelihoods, knowledge, and perceptions,” and “policy, financing, and markets.” There was high agreement about which priorities to include, with questions on policy incentives, knowledge-exchange, agroforestry design (e.g., tree/crop selection), biodiversity, ecosystem functioning, well-being, markets, and food security. We identified a need for landscape-scale and longer-term research. Our agenda is a rare example of a research-prioritization process that includes farmers and other agricultural stakeholders throughout the research process. The value of this approach can be seen in the inclusion of research priorities that are grounded in the real world and relevant to different actors. Our agenda goes beyond existing evidence syntheses in scope, and should be used alongside them to identify stakeholder-relevant gaps for future primary research and evidence synthesis. By guiding researchers and funding bodies to impactful areas of enquiry, it can promote evidence-based agroforestry practice and policy. Addressing this research agenda requires better support for long-term, transdisciplinary, multi-stakeholder research, and funded demonstration sites or living labs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7721,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","volume":"46 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13593-026-01089-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-026-01089-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is growing recognition of agroforestry’s potential to help mitigate and provide resilience to the climate and biodiversity crises. Beyond its environmental benefits, agroforestry can also enhance production and profits, making it a sustainable farming solution that is scalable. Despite this, uptake within Europe is low, and many knowledge gaps remain that need to be addressed to promote adoption and optimize the management and implementation of agroforestry systems. We co-developed a research agenda for agroforestry using a multi-actor approach and a modified Delphi method in 2023. 156 UK-based stakeholders contributed to this process, including farmers, advisors, policy makers, NGOs, and researchers. An initial list of 238 research priorities (high-priority research questions) was submitted via a survey and a workshop. This was shortened during a second workshop with 48 participants. The final list included 40 research priorities across the themes “environment and production,” “human livelihoods, knowledge, and perceptions,” and “policy, financing, and markets.” There was high agreement about which priorities to include, with questions on policy incentives, knowledge-exchange, agroforestry design (e.g., tree/crop selection), biodiversity, ecosystem functioning, well-being, markets, and food security. We identified a need for landscape-scale and longer-term research. Our agenda is a rare example of a research-prioritization process that includes farmers and other agricultural stakeholders throughout the research process. The value of this approach can be seen in the inclusion of research priorities that are grounded in the real world and relevant to different actors. Our agenda goes beyond existing evidence syntheses in scope, and should be used alongside them to identify stakeholder-relevant gaps for future primary research and evidence synthesis. By guiding researchers and funding bodies to impactful areas of enquiry, it can promote evidence-based agroforestry practice and policy. Addressing this research agenda requires better support for long-term, transdisciplinary, multi-stakeholder research, and funded demonstration sites or living labs.

使用多参与者方法共同设计英国农林业研究议程
人们越来越认识到农林业有助于缓解气候和生物多样性危机并提供抵御力的潜力。除了环境效益外,农林业还可以提高产量和利润,使其成为可扩展的可持续农业解决方案。尽管如此,欧洲内部的吸收程度很低,仍然存在许多知识空白,需要解决这些空白,以促进采用和优化农林业系统的管理和实施。我们在2023年使用多参与者方法和改进的德尔菲方法共同制定了农林业研究议程。156名来自英国的利益相关者参与了这一进程,包括农民、顾问、政策制定者、非政府组织和研究人员。通过调查和讲习班提交了238项研究优先事项(高优先研究问题)的初步清单。在第二次有48名参与者的研讨会期间,这一时间缩短了。最终的名单包括40个研究重点,主题包括“环境与生产”、“人类生计、知识和观念”以及“政策、融资和市场”。关于应包括哪些优先事项的问题,在政策激励、知识交流、农林业设计(例如树木/作物选择)、生物多样性、生态系统功能、福祉、市场和粮食安全等方面达成了高度一致。我们确定需要进行景观规模和长期研究。我们的议程是一个罕见的研究优先排序过程的例子,在整个研究过程中包括农民和其他农业利益相关者。这种方法的价值可以从纳入基于现实世界并与不同行为者相关的研究优先事项中看出。我们的议程超出了现有证据综合的范围,并应与它们一起使用,以确定与利益攸关方相关的差距,以便将来进行初步研究和证据综合。通过引导研究人员和资助机构进入有影响的研究领域,它可以促进以证据为基础的农林业实践和政策。解决这一研究议程需要更好地支持长期的、跨学科的、多方利益相关者的研究和资助的示范地点或生活实验室。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy for Sustainable Development
Agronomy for Sustainable Development 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.20%
发文量
108
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Agronomy for Sustainable Development (ASD) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal of international scope, dedicated to publishing original research articles, review articles, and meta-analyses aimed at improving sustainability in agricultural and food systems. The journal serves as a bridge between agronomy, cropping, and farming system research and various other disciplines including ecology, genetics, economics, and social sciences. ASD encourages studies in agroecology, participatory research, and interdisciplinary approaches, with a focus on systems thinking applied at different scales from field to global levels. Research articles published in ASD should present significant scientific advancements compared to existing knowledge, within an international context. Review articles should critically evaluate emerging topics, and opinion papers may also be submitted as reviews. Meta-analysis articles should provide clear contributions to resolving widely debated scientific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书