Routine Estimation of the Prospect of Individual Forecasts and Their Efficiency

IF 0.9 4区 地球科学 Q4 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
V. A. Saltykov, D. V. Chebrov
{"title":"Routine Estimation of the Prospect of Individual Forecasts and Their Efficiency","authors":"V. A. Saltykov,&nbsp;D. V. Chebrov","doi":"10.1134/S0742046325700472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>One of the main tasks facing the Kamchatka Branch of the Russian Expert Council on Earthquake Prediction and Seismic Risk Assessment (KB REC) is to evaluate submitted forecasts of large earthquakes. The experience at the KB REC showed that forecasts predicting the future evolution of a seismicity situation submitted by researchers very frequently contain merely some individual elements necessary for prediction, which is clearly insufficient. Examination of such forecasts is difficult, and occasionally outright impossible, which complicates the use of such data in the analysis of seismicity situations and the development of a comprehensive forecast evaluation. While the evaluation of the success of a forecast causes no difficulty to a first approximation, a preliminary (at the time the forecast is submitted) evaluation of the quality of a forecast in any form is frequently difficult. This especially concerns novel or recently developed prediction procedures, that is, procedures without a “history” at the KB REC. It is such forecasts which constitute the object of this study. The tasks we set ourselves to resolve are (1) developing a procedure applicable to the evaluation of a forecast at the time it is submitted, including the estimation of the probability of random occurrence, (2) estimation of the success of a forecast when any statistics based on the use of this particular prediction procedure is absent. This paper presents the approaches used at the KB REC for routine evaluation of the success of a forecast and/or precursors. All parameters used to evaluate prediction procedures and their practical application are formalized and possess clear physical meaning.</p>","PeriodicalId":56112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Volcanology and Seismology","volume":"19 1","pages":"S152 - S160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Volcanology and Seismology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0742046325700472","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the main tasks facing the Kamchatka Branch of the Russian Expert Council on Earthquake Prediction and Seismic Risk Assessment (KB REC) is to evaluate submitted forecasts of large earthquakes. The experience at the KB REC showed that forecasts predicting the future evolution of a seismicity situation submitted by researchers very frequently contain merely some individual elements necessary for prediction, which is clearly insufficient. Examination of such forecasts is difficult, and occasionally outright impossible, which complicates the use of such data in the analysis of seismicity situations and the development of a comprehensive forecast evaluation. While the evaluation of the success of a forecast causes no difficulty to a first approximation, a preliminary (at the time the forecast is submitted) evaluation of the quality of a forecast in any form is frequently difficult. This especially concerns novel or recently developed prediction procedures, that is, procedures without a “history” at the KB REC. It is such forecasts which constitute the object of this study. The tasks we set ourselves to resolve are (1) developing a procedure applicable to the evaluation of a forecast at the time it is submitted, including the estimation of the probability of random occurrence, (2) estimation of the success of a forecast when any statistics based on the use of this particular prediction procedure is absent. This paper presents the approaches used at the KB REC for routine evaluation of the success of a forecast and/or precursors. All parameters used to evaluate prediction procedures and their practical application are formalized and possess clear physical meaning.

Abstract Image

个别预报前景的常规估计及其效率
俄罗斯地震预测和地震风险评估专家委员会堪察加分部面临的主要任务之一是评估提交的大地震预报。KB REC的经验表明,研究人员提交的预测地震活动情况未来演变的预报常常只包含一些预测所必需的个别元素,这显然是不够的。对这类预报的审查是困难的,有时甚至是完全不可能的,这使得在分析地震活动情况和制定综合预报评估时使用这类数据变得复杂。虽然对预报成功与否的评估对初步估计没有困难,但对任何形式的预报质量进行初步(在提交预报时)评估通常是困难的。这尤其涉及到新的或最近开发的预测程序,即在KB REC没有“历史”的程序。正是这些预测构成了本研究的对象。我们为自己设定的任务是:(1)开发一种程序,适用于在提交预测时对其进行评估,包括对随机发生概率的估计;(2)在没有基于该特定预测程序使用的任何统计数据时,对预测的成功进行估计。本文介绍了KB REC用于常规评估预报和/或前兆成功的方法。所有用于评价预测程序及其实际应用的参数都是形式化的,具有明确的物理意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Volcanology and Seismology
Journal of Volcanology and Seismology 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
27
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Volcanology and Seismology publishes theoretical and experimental studies, communications, and reports on volcanic, seismic, geodynamic, and magmatic processes occurring in the areas of island arcs and other active regions of the Earth. In particular, the journal looks at present-day land and submarine volcanic activity; Neogene–Quaternary volcanism; mechanisms of plutonic activity; the geochemistry of volcanic and postvolcanic processes; geothermal systems in volcanic regions; and seismological monitoring. In addition, the journal surveys earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, and techniques for predicting them.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书