Homo heidelbergensis and The Origins of The Middle Stone Age: The Kabwe (Broken Hill) Lithic Assemblage

IF 1.1 3区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
David L. G. Miedzianogora, Ceri Shipton, Matt Pope
{"title":"Homo heidelbergensis and The Origins of The Middle Stone Age: The Kabwe (Broken Hill) Lithic Assemblage","authors":"David L. G. Miedzianogora,&nbsp;Ceri Shipton,&nbsp;Matt Pope","doi":"10.1007/s10437-025-09642-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Middle Stone Age (MSA) saw the emergence of novel behaviours in the archaeological record and is generally associated with our own species, <i>Homo sapiens</i>. Yet, most archaeological assemblages contain no fossil remains, with those rare assemblages with a fossil association giving a less than clear-cut picture. Here, we describe the lithic assemblage from Kabwe, Zambia, a cave site that was originally discovered in the early twentieth century and is most famous for the Kabwe cranium, an exceptionally well-preserved Middle Pleistocene <i>Homo</i> fossil. The nature of the assemblage’s excavation means that it is not well-provenanced. To address this issue, we draw on archival data related to the original excavations and discoveries during the 1920s and use the remains of original matrix still adhering to several of the lithic artefacts to separate out the assemblage stratigraphically. This indicates no significant difference in technological strategies across the assemblage. Whilst there is an Early Stone Age component to the assemblage in the form of spheroids, it is generally consistent with MSA technological strategies, including notably Levallois-like and laminar modes of production evident from cores and debitage. We thus interpret the Kabwe assemblage as a transitional ESA/MSA industry. Due to the possible association with <i>Homo heidelbergensis </i>sensu lato fossils in the form of both the Kabwe cranium and postcranial remains, this hints that the early MSA could have included other members of our clade rather than just <i>Homo sapiens</i>, complicating current models of MSA origins.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46493,"journal":{"name":"African Archaeological Review","volume":"42 4","pages":"659 - 682"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10437-025-09642-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Archaeological Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10437-025-09642-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Middle Stone Age (MSA) saw the emergence of novel behaviours in the archaeological record and is generally associated with our own species, Homo sapiens. Yet, most archaeological assemblages contain no fossil remains, with those rare assemblages with a fossil association giving a less than clear-cut picture. Here, we describe the lithic assemblage from Kabwe, Zambia, a cave site that was originally discovered in the early twentieth century and is most famous for the Kabwe cranium, an exceptionally well-preserved Middle Pleistocene Homo fossil. The nature of the assemblage’s excavation means that it is not well-provenanced. To address this issue, we draw on archival data related to the original excavations and discoveries during the 1920s and use the remains of original matrix still adhering to several of the lithic artefacts to separate out the assemblage stratigraphically. This indicates no significant difference in technological strategies across the assemblage. Whilst there is an Early Stone Age component to the assemblage in the form of spheroids, it is generally consistent with MSA technological strategies, including notably Levallois-like and laminar modes of production evident from cores and debitage. We thus interpret the Kabwe assemblage as a transitional ESA/MSA industry. Due to the possible association with Homo heidelbergensis sensu lato fossils in the form of both the Kabwe cranium and postcranial remains, this hints that the early MSA could have included other members of our clade rather than just Homo sapiens, complicating current models of MSA origins.

海德堡人与中石器时代的起源:Kabwe(破碎山)石器组合
中石器时代(MSA)在考古记录中出现了新的行为,通常与我们自己的物种——智人有关。然而,大多数考古组合都没有化石遗迹,那些罕见的组合与化石的联系给了一个不太清晰的画面。在这里,我们描述了来自赞比亚Kabwe的石器组合,这个洞穴遗址最初是在20世纪初发现的,最著名的是Kabwe头盖骨,一个保存非常完好的中更新世人类化石。该组合的挖掘性质意味着它没有得到很好的证明。为了解决这一问题,我们利用与20世纪20年代原始发掘和发现相关的档案数据,并利用仍然附着在几个石器人工制品上的原始基质的残留物,从地层上分离出组合。这表明在整个组合中技术策略没有显著差异。虽然该组合以球状体的形式存在早期石器时代的成分,但它总体上与MSA的技术策略一致,包括明显的勒瓦卢瓦式和层流生产模式,从岩心和碎屑中可以看出。因此,我们将Kabwe组合解释为过渡的ESA/MSA行业。由于卡布韦头盖骨和后头盖骨的形式可能与海德堡人的感觉化石有关,这暗示早期的MSA可能包括我们进化支的其他成员,而不仅仅是智人,这使目前的MSA起源模型复杂化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: African Archaeological Review publishes original research articles, review essays, reports, book/media reviews, and forums/commentaries on African archaeology, highlighting the contributions of the African continent to critical global issues in the past and present. Relevant topics include the emergence of modern humans and earliest manifestations of human culture; subsistence, agricultural, and technological innovations; and social complexity, as well as topical issues on heritage. The journal features timely continental and subcontinental studies covering cultural and historical processes; interregional interactions; biocultural evolution; cultural dynamics and ecology; the role of cultural materials in politics, ideology, and religion; different dimensions of economic life; the application of historical, textual, ethnoarchaeological, and archaeometric data in archaeological interpretation; and the intersections of cultural heritage, information technology, and community/public archaeology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书