Rapid Determination of 36 Pesticide Residues in Tea Soup Using Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction Technology Based On Hydrophobic Fatty Acid Combined With Effervescent‐Assisted Extraction

IF 1.6 Q4 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Xiwen He, Zhiwen Li, Zhang Li, Juan Zhao, F. Yu, Wenbin Gan
{"title":"Rapid Determination of 36 Pesticide Residues in Tea Soup Using Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction Technology Based On Hydrophobic Fatty Acid Combined With Effervescent‐Assisted Extraction","authors":"Xiwen He, Zhiwen Li, Zhang Li, Juan Zhao, F. Yu, Wenbin Gan","doi":"10.1002/sscp.70037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Tea is one of the most popular beverages in the world. In tea plant ( Camellia sinensis ) cultivation, the application of pesticides and herbicides constitutes a common agricultural practice for integrated pest management and weed control. Researchers usually focus on the pesticide residues in tea itself and rarely study the pesticide residues in tea soup. This study presents a rapid quantitative analysis method for detecting 36 common pesticides in green tea soup. The method involves using effervescent‐assisted extraction combined with dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction. Pesticides in tea soup are extracted with nonanoic acid, and during the extraction process, sodium carbonate solution (Na 2 CO 3 solution) and sulfuric acid (H 2 SO 4 ) are added to produce carbon dioxide for auxiliary extraction. The solidified substances are then dissolved in methanol and analyzed using LC–MS/MS. This study revealed that the 36 target pesticides exhibited strong linear responses across a concentration range of 1–50 ng mL −1 , with correlation coefficients ( R 2 ) exceeding 0.99. The developed method demonstrated a limit of quantification (LOQ) of 0.1 µg L −1 , accompanied by recovery rates ranging from 76.3% to 101.4% and relative standard deviations (RSDs) below 6.7% across all validation parameters. This approach is cost‐effective, minimizes the use of organic reagents, and reduces environmental pollution. Overall, the combination of effervescent‐assisted extraction and dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction is efficient for detecting pesticides in tea soup, making it suitable for routine analysis of commonly used pesticides in green tea soup.","PeriodicalId":21639,"journal":{"name":"SEPARATION SCIENCE PLUS","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SEPARATION SCIENCE PLUS","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sscp.70037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Tea is one of the most popular beverages in the world. In tea plant ( Camellia sinensis ) cultivation, the application of pesticides and herbicides constitutes a common agricultural practice for integrated pest management and weed control. Researchers usually focus on the pesticide residues in tea itself and rarely study the pesticide residues in tea soup. This study presents a rapid quantitative analysis method for detecting 36 common pesticides in green tea soup. The method involves using effervescent‐assisted extraction combined with dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction. Pesticides in tea soup are extracted with nonanoic acid, and during the extraction process, sodium carbonate solution (Na 2 CO 3 solution) and sulfuric acid (H 2 SO 4 ) are added to produce carbon dioxide for auxiliary extraction. The solidified substances are then dissolved in methanol and analyzed using LC–MS/MS. This study revealed that the 36 target pesticides exhibited strong linear responses across a concentration range of 1–50 ng mL −1 , with correlation coefficients ( R 2 ) exceeding 0.99. The developed method demonstrated a limit of quantification (LOQ) of 0.1 µg L −1 , accompanied by recovery rates ranging from 76.3% to 101.4% and relative standard deviations (RSDs) below 6.7% across all validation parameters. This approach is cost‐effective, minimizes the use of organic reagents, and reduces environmental pollution. Overall, the combination of effervescent‐assisted extraction and dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction is efficient for detecting pesticides in tea soup, making it suitable for routine analysis of commonly used pesticides in green tea soup.
疏水脂肪酸-气泡辅助萃取分散液-液微萃取技术快速测定茶汤中36种农药残留
茶是世界上最受欢迎的饮料之一。在茶树(Camellia sinensis)种植中,农药和除草剂的应用是综合虫害管理和杂草控制的常见农业做法。研究人员通常关注茶叶本身的农药残留,而很少对茶汤中的农药残留进行研究。建立了一种快速定量检测绿茶中36种常见农药的方法。方法包括泡腾辅助萃取与分散液-液微萃取相结合。用壬酸提取茶汤中的农药,在提取过程中加入碳酸钠溶液(na2co3溶液)和硫酸(h2so4)产生二氧化碳辅助提取。然后将固化的物质溶解在甲醇中,使用LC-MS /MS进行分析。结果表明,在1 ~ 50 ng mL−1的浓度范围内,36种目标农药表现出较强的线性响应,相关系数(r2)均超过0.99。该方法的定量限(LOQ)为0.1µg L−1,回收率为76.3% ~ 101.4%,相对标准偏差(rsd)小于6.7%。这种方法具有成本效益,最大限度地减少了有机试剂的使用,并减少了环境污染。综上所述,泡腾辅助萃取和分散液液微萃取相结合的方法对茶汤中农药的检测是有效的,适用于绿茶中常用农药的常规分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SEPARATION SCIENCE PLUS
SEPARATION SCIENCE PLUS CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
111
文献相关原料
公司名称
产品信息
麦克林
n-heptadecane
麦克林
n-hexadecane
麦克林
1-dodecanol
麦克林
1-undecanol
麦克林
decanoic acid
麦克林
nonanoic acid
麦克林
octanoic acid
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书