Bariatric Surgery With or Without Concomitant Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Morbidly Obese Patients With Gallbladder Stone Disease: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.

IF 3.9 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Journal of Obesity Pub Date : 2026-02-26 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1155/jobe/6054585
Mohamed Atteya Heikal, Ahmed Mohamed Reda Negm, Hosam Mohamed Elghadban, Mahmoud A Aziz
{"title":"Bariatric Surgery With or Without Concomitant Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Morbidly Obese Patients With Gallbladder Stone Disease: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.","authors":"Mohamed Atteya Heikal, Ahmed Mohamed Reda Negm, Hosam Mohamed Elghadban, Mahmoud A Aziz","doi":"10.1155/jobe/6054585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Imagine a surgeon's critical decision: Should the gallbladder be removed now, along with the planned bariatric surgery, or risk the complication and necessity of a second surgery later? This clinical dilemma is central to treating morbidly obese patients, who face a high prevalence of gallstone disease exacerbated by rapid postoperative weight loss. The best approach to managing existing gallstones in bariatric candidates remains debated, with debate focusing on whether combining laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with bariatric surgery is both safe and advantageous. In this pilot study, we provide randomized evidence to guide this decision.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective randomized controlled pilot study, 58 morbidly obese patients with ultrasound-confirmed gallstones were randomly assigned to two groups: Group I (<i>n</i> = 30) received bariatric surgery and LC; Group II (<i>n</i> = 28) had bariatric surgery only, with LC delayed for symptoms. The primary outcomes were clearly defined as operative time, intraoperative complications, and postoperative morbidity, providing a focused measure of safety and efficacy. Secondary outcomes included hospital stay, pain, and follow-up gallstone symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline demographics and comorbidities were similar across groups. Operative time was longer in Group I (98.93 ± 11.58 min) than in Group II (75.18 ± 11.26 min, <i>p</i> < 0.001). An extra port was used in 20% of Group I patients, compared with none in Group II (<i>p</i> = 0.012). No significant differences were observed in bleeding, bile leakage, postoperative complications, or hospital stay. Group I reported higher pain scores (<i>p</i> < 0.001). During follow-up, 79.3% of Group II developed symptomatic gallstones, requiring later cholecystectomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Concomitant LC during bariatric surgery in morbidly obese patients with pre-existing gallstones is demonstrated to be safe and feasible, with acceptable increases in operative time and postoperative pain. The high rate (79.3%) of symptomatic gallstone development in patients who did not undergo concomitant cholecystectomy supports adopting routine concomitant LC to prevent future morbidity, thereby influencing clinical decision-making and standard practice. <b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04567890.</p>","PeriodicalId":16628,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obesity","volume":"2026 ","pages":"6054585"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12945468/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/jobe/6054585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Imagine a surgeon's critical decision: Should the gallbladder be removed now, along with the planned bariatric surgery, or risk the complication and necessity of a second surgery later? This clinical dilemma is central to treating morbidly obese patients, who face a high prevalence of gallstone disease exacerbated by rapid postoperative weight loss. The best approach to managing existing gallstones in bariatric candidates remains debated, with debate focusing on whether combining laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with bariatric surgery is both safe and advantageous. In this pilot study, we provide randomized evidence to guide this decision.

Methods: In this prospective randomized controlled pilot study, 58 morbidly obese patients with ultrasound-confirmed gallstones were randomly assigned to two groups: Group I (n = 30) received bariatric surgery and LC; Group II (n = 28) had bariatric surgery only, with LC delayed for symptoms. The primary outcomes were clearly defined as operative time, intraoperative complications, and postoperative morbidity, providing a focused measure of safety and efficacy. Secondary outcomes included hospital stay, pain, and follow-up gallstone symptoms.

Results: Baseline demographics and comorbidities were similar across groups. Operative time was longer in Group I (98.93 ± 11.58 min) than in Group II (75.18 ± 11.26 min, p < 0.001). An extra port was used in 20% of Group I patients, compared with none in Group II (p = 0.012). No significant differences were observed in bleeding, bile leakage, postoperative complications, or hospital stay. Group I reported higher pain scores (p < 0.001). During follow-up, 79.3% of Group II developed symptomatic gallstones, requiring later cholecystectomy.

Conclusion: Concomitant LC during bariatric surgery in morbidly obese patients with pre-existing gallstones is demonstrated to be safe and feasible, with acceptable increases in operative time and postoperative pain. The high rate (79.3%) of symptomatic gallstone development in patients who did not undergo concomitant cholecystectomy supports adopting routine concomitant LC to prevent future morbidity, thereby influencing clinical decision-making and standard practice. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04567890.

伴有胆囊结石的病态肥胖患者伴或不伴腹腔镜胆囊切除术的减肥手术:一项前瞻性随机对照先导研究
想象一下一个外科医生的关键决定:是现在切除胆囊,同时进行计划中的减肥手术,还是冒着并发症和以后必须进行的第二次手术的风险?这种临床困境是治疗病态肥胖患者的核心,这些患者面临着高患病率的胆结石疾病,术后体重迅速减轻。治疗肥胖患者现有胆结石的最佳方法仍存在争议,争论的焦点是腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)与减肥手术是否安全且有利。在这项初步研究中,我们提供了随机证据来指导这一决定。方法:在这项前瞻性随机对照先导研究中,58例超声证实胆结石的病态肥胖患者被随机分为两组:第一组(n = 30)接受减肥手术和LC;II组(n = 28)仅进行减肥手术,LC因症状延迟。主要结局明确定义为手术时间、术中并发症和术后发病率,提供了一个集中的安全性和有效性指标。次要结局包括住院时间、疼痛和随访的胆结石症状。结果:基线人口统计学和合并症在各组间相似。手术时间I组(98.93±11.58 min)明显长于II组(75.18±11.26 min, p < 0.001)。20%的I组患者使用了额外的端口,而II组没有(p = 0.012)。在出血、胆漏、术后并发症或住院时间方面没有观察到显著差异。第一组疼痛评分较高(p < 0.001)。在随访期间,79.3%的II组患者出现症状性胆结石,需要随后进行胆囊切除术。结论:在病态肥胖合并胆结石患者的减肥手术中合并LC被证明是安全可行的,手术时间和术后疼痛增加是可以接受的。未行胆囊切除术的患者出现症状性胆结石的高发生率(79.3%)支持采用常规胆囊切除术预防未来发病率,从而影响临床决策和标准实践。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04567890。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Obesity
Journal of Obesity ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Obesity is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a multidisciplinary forum for basic and clinical research as well as applied studies in the areas of adipocyte biology & physiology, lipid metabolism, metabolic syndrome, diabetes, paediatric obesity, genetics, behavioural epidemiology, nutrition & eating disorders, exercise & human physiology, weight control and health risks associated with obesity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书