Somatosensory functions of ambulatory individuals with stroke related obviously with mobility without upper limb contribution.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Sugalya Amatachaya, Phouthasone Thavone, Wilairat Namwong, Thiwabhorn Thaweewannakij, Arpassanan Wiyanad, Pipatana Amatachaya
{"title":"Somatosensory functions of ambulatory individuals with stroke related obviously with mobility without upper limb contribution.","authors":"Sugalya Amatachaya, Phouthasone Thavone, Wilairat Namwong, Thiwabhorn Thaweewannakij, Arpassanan Wiyanad, Pipatana Amatachaya","doi":"10.1177/10538127261428176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThere is limited evidence regarding the proportion of somatosensory deficits and their contribution to mobility, particularly in relation to independence and safety among ambulatory individuals with stroke from a developing country.ObjectivesTo report the proportion of somatosensory deficits, and investigate the relationship between sensorimotor deficits and mobility outcomes among individuals with stroke who walked with or without a walking device.MethodsEighty participants, with an average age of approximately 60 years both male and female, were cross-sectionally assessed for their sensorimotor functions, and mobility using the 10-meter walk test, timed up and go test (TUG), five times sit-to-stand test (FTSST), and 6-min walk test. The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (r<sub>s</sub>) was used to analyze the correlation between sensorimotor and mobility outcomes.ResultsNearly 60% of the participants experienced somatosensory deficits (5 absent and 42 impaired sensation). A large proportion of these individuals walked with a walking device (42.6%). Mobility outcomes indicated that these participants walked non-functionally with high risk of fall and low functional endurance. The motor scores were strongly correlated with the TUG data (r<sub>s</sub> = -0.719, p < 0.01), whereas the somatosensory scores were related predominantly to the FTSST data (r<sub>s</sub> = -0.520, p < 0.01).ConclusionsSomatosensory impairments are common among ambulatory individuals with stroke. These impairments were primarily associated with mobility performed without hands. Therefore, rehabilitation strategies should target somatosensory alongside motor functions to enhance independence and safety, especially when therapeutic goals involve mobility without upper limb contribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"10538127261428176"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127261428176","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundThere is limited evidence regarding the proportion of somatosensory deficits and their contribution to mobility, particularly in relation to independence and safety among ambulatory individuals with stroke from a developing country.ObjectivesTo report the proportion of somatosensory deficits, and investigate the relationship between sensorimotor deficits and mobility outcomes among individuals with stroke who walked with or without a walking device.MethodsEighty participants, with an average age of approximately 60 years both male and female, were cross-sectionally assessed for their sensorimotor functions, and mobility using the 10-meter walk test, timed up and go test (TUG), five times sit-to-stand test (FTSST), and 6-min walk test. The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (rs) was used to analyze the correlation between sensorimotor and mobility outcomes.ResultsNearly 60% of the participants experienced somatosensory deficits (5 absent and 42 impaired sensation). A large proportion of these individuals walked with a walking device (42.6%). Mobility outcomes indicated that these participants walked non-functionally with high risk of fall and low functional endurance. The motor scores were strongly correlated with the TUG data (rs = -0.719, p < 0.01), whereas the somatosensory scores were related predominantly to the FTSST data (rs = -0.520, p < 0.01).ConclusionsSomatosensory impairments are common among ambulatory individuals with stroke. These impairments were primarily associated with mobility performed without hands. Therefore, rehabilitation strategies should target somatosensory alongside motor functions to enhance independence and safety, especially when therapeutic goals involve mobility without upper limb contribution.

可活动的脑卒中患者的体感功能与活动能力有明显的相关性,但上肢没有贡献。
背景:关于躯体感觉缺陷的比例及其对活动能力的影响,特别是与发展中国家中风患者的独立性和安全性有关的证据有限。目的报告脑卒中患者体感觉缺陷的比例,并探讨感觉运动缺陷与活动能力结果之间的关系。方法对80名平均年龄约为60岁的男性和女性的感觉运动功能和活动能力进行横断评估,采用10米步行测试、计时行走测试(TUG)、5次坐立测试(FTSST)和6分钟步行测试。采用Spearman等级相关系数(rs)分析感觉运动与活动能力结果的相关性。结果近60%的受试者出现体感缺陷(5例缺失,42例感觉受损)。其中很大一部分人使用步行设备行走(42.6%)。活动能力结果表明,这些参与者无功能行走,跌倒风险高,功能耐力低。运动评分与TUG数据呈显著正相关(rs = -0.719, p s = -0.520, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty. In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书