Genetically Informed Research Designs in Perinatal Pharmacoepidemiology: A Methodological Overview.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Drug Safety Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-02 DOI:10.1007/s40264-026-01647-9
Alexis C Carson, Mahmoud Zidan, Emilie Willoch Olstad, Kristina Gervin, Tessel E Galesloot, Iris Scholte, Eivind Ystrøm, Hedvig Nordeng, Marleen M H J van Gelder
{"title":"Genetically Informed Research Designs in Perinatal Pharmacoepidemiology: A Methodological Overview.","authors":"Alexis C Carson, Mahmoud Zidan, Emilie Willoch Olstad, Kristina Gervin, Tessel E Galesloot, Iris Scholte, Eivind Ystrøm, Hedvig Nordeng, Marleen M H J van Gelder","doi":"10.1007/s40264-026-01647-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the widespread use of medications during pregnancy, ethical and methodological barriers to clinical trials make observational studies necessary for evaluating medication safety in this population. Observational studies are prone to biases that often limit their validity due to the lack of randomization; integrating genetic information through discordant sibling designs, polygenic scores, and Mendelian randomization can address several confounding issues. However, application of these three approaches in perinatal pharmacoepidemiology has been limited. Complementing traditional designs with these genetically informed research designs can tackle common biases and strengthen causal inference. This paper focuses on applying genetically informed research designs to child outcomes in perinatal pharmacoepidemiology by reviewing various methods, discussing their strengths and limitations, and examining their application to date, as well as considerations for implementing them in future research. Such considerations include the availability of genetic data, the complexity of integrating genetic data with existing epidemiological data, and selection of appropriate genetic instruments for analyses. Incorporating causal inference in perinatal pharmacoepidemiology can ultimately contribute to enhancing safe medication use during pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11382,"journal":{"name":"Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"761-773"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13263198/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-026-01647-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the widespread use of medications during pregnancy, ethical and methodological barriers to clinical trials make observational studies necessary for evaluating medication safety in this population. Observational studies are prone to biases that often limit their validity due to the lack of randomization; integrating genetic information through discordant sibling designs, polygenic scores, and Mendelian randomization can address several confounding issues. However, application of these three approaches in perinatal pharmacoepidemiology has been limited. Complementing traditional designs with these genetically informed research designs can tackle common biases and strengthen causal inference. This paper focuses on applying genetically informed research designs to child outcomes in perinatal pharmacoepidemiology by reviewing various methods, discussing their strengths and limitations, and examining their application to date, as well as considerations for implementing them in future research. Such considerations include the availability of genetic data, the complexity of integrating genetic data with existing epidemiological data, and selection of appropriate genetic instruments for analyses. Incorporating causal inference in perinatal pharmacoepidemiology can ultimately contribute to enhancing safe medication use during pregnancy.

围产期药物流行病学的遗传信息研究设计:方法学综述。
尽管在怀孕期间广泛使用药物,但临床试验的伦理和方法学障碍使观察性研究成为评估这一人群药物安全性的必要条件。观察性研究容易出现偏倚,由于缺乏随机化,往往会限制其有效性;通过不一致的兄弟姐妹设计、多基因评分和孟德尔随机化来整合遗传信息可以解决几个混淆问题。然而,这三种方法在围产期药物流行病学中的应用有限。用这些遗传信息研究设计来补充传统设计可以解决常见的偏见并加强因果推理。本文通过回顾各种方法,讨论它们的优势和局限性,并检查它们迄今为止的应用情况,以及在未来研究中实施它们的考虑,重点介绍将遗传知情研究设计应用于围产期药物流行病学的儿童结局。这些考虑包括遗传数据的可获得性、将遗传数据与现有流行病学数据相结合的复杂性以及选择适当的遗传工具进行分析。在围产期药物流行病学中纳入因果推理最终有助于加强妊娠期间的安全用药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug Safety
Drug Safety 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
112
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Drug Safety is the official journal of the International Society of Pharmacovigilance. The journal includes: Overviews of contentious or emerging issues. Comprehensive narrative reviews that provide an authoritative source of information on epidemiology, clinical features, prevention and management of adverse effects of individual drugs and drug classes. In-depth benefit-risk assessment of adverse effect and efficacy data for a drug in a defined therapeutic area. Systematic reviews (with or without meta-analyses) that collate empirical evidence to answer a specific research question, using explicit, systematic methods as outlined by the PRISMA statement. Original research articles reporting the results of well-designed studies in disciplines such as pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacovigilance, pharmacology and toxicology, and pharmacogenomics. Editorials and commentaries on topical issues. Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in Drug Safety Drugs may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书