Pengchi Chen, Raju Ahluwalia, Cher B Chuo, Sarah E Johnson-Lynn
{"title":"Management of the acute diabetic foot : an update.","authors":"Pengchi Chen, Raju Ahluwalia, Cher B Chuo, Sarah E Johnson-Lynn","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.108B3.BJJ-2025-0063.R2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An acutely infected diabetic foot can be a very serious complication of diabetes, associated with high morbidity and risk of amputation, and a substantial healthcare burden. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, the British Orthopaedic Association, and the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot have provided guidelines to support the timely and effective management of these patients. This review provides an update on current management strategies for acute diabetic foot infections. Evolving practices and controversies are discussed, including innovations in the techniques of debridement and primary wound closure, the use of local antibiotic carriers, and challenges such as biofilms and multidrug resistance. Adjunctive physical forms of treatment such as negative pressure wound treatment, laser and photodynamic treatment, and larval debridement are also examined, as well as the expanding role of plastic surgeons in reconstructive strategies and the integration of skin substitutes and advanced dressings. In order to support clinical decision-making and improve outcomes, a suggested algorithm for managing new, deteriorating, or non-healing foot ulcers is presented, offering a roadmap for multidisciplinary team pathways. This approach aims to implement enhanced local strategies, reduce delays, and optimize care. The review provides insights for those who treat these patients by addressing the evolving practices and ongoing challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"108-B 3","pages":"322-330"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.108B3.BJJ-2025-0063.R2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
An acutely infected diabetic foot can be a very serious complication of diabetes, associated with high morbidity and risk of amputation, and a substantial healthcare burden. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, the British Orthopaedic Association, and the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot have provided guidelines to support the timely and effective management of these patients. This review provides an update on current management strategies for acute diabetic foot infections. Evolving practices and controversies are discussed, including innovations in the techniques of debridement and primary wound closure, the use of local antibiotic carriers, and challenges such as biofilms and multidrug resistance. Adjunctive physical forms of treatment such as negative pressure wound treatment, laser and photodynamic treatment, and larval debridement are also examined, as well as the expanding role of plastic surgeons in reconstructive strategies and the integration of skin substitutes and advanced dressings. In order to support clinical decision-making and improve outcomes, a suggested algorithm for managing new, deteriorating, or non-healing foot ulcers is presented, offering a roadmap for multidisciplinary team pathways. This approach aims to implement enhanced local strategies, reduce delays, and optimize care. The review provides insights for those who treat these patients by addressing the evolving practices and ongoing challenges.
期刊介绍:
We welcome original articles from any part of the world. The papers are assessed by members of the Editorial Board and our international panel of expert reviewers, then either accepted for publication or rejected by the Editor. We receive over 2000 submissions each year and accept about 250 for publication, many after revisions recommended by the reviewers, editors or statistical advisers. A decision usually takes between six and eight weeks. Each paper is assessed by two reviewers with a special interest in the subject covered by the paper, and also by members of the editorial team. Controversial papers will be discussed at a full meeting of the Editorial Board. Publication is between four and six months after acceptance.