Functional assessment in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty : a systematic review.

IF 4.8 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Steven Govinda Persaud, Theofilos Karasavvidis, Richard Jose Rivera, Karlos E Zepeda, Brian P Chalmers, Eytan M Debbi
{"title":"Functional assessment in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty : a systematic review.","authors":"Steven Govinda Persaud, Theofilos Karasavvidis, Richard Jose Rivera, Karlos E Zepeda, Brian P Chalmers, Eytan M Debbi","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.108B3.BJJ-2025-0009.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Traditional methods of measuring patient satisfaction and improvement after total knee arthroplasy (TKA) rely on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), which are subjective and prone to recall bias. As a result, there has been a considerable recent increase in the use of objective functional assessments to quantify improvement in patients undergoing TKA. However, the functional assessments used in the literature are many and diverse. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate and synthesize all the objective methods of functional assessment which are recorded pre- and postoperatively, and used to measure improvement in these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies in English of patients who underwent TKA, in which at least one objective assessment of pre- and postoperative function was reported, were identified from a literature search on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases from their inception to 1 September 2024 and included. Subgroup analyses included gait analysis, motion analysis, walking tests, wearables/sensors, and strength tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 314 studies using 21 unique categories of functional assessment were included. The three most common methods of assessment were the Timed Up and Go test, traditional gait analysis, and the use of a dynamometer to quantify quadriceps strength. There has been a considerable increase in the use of functional assessments for patients undergoing TKA in recent years, with a wide range of tools being used to collect spatiotemporal, kinetic, and kinematic data.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review highlights the diversity of the functional assessments which are used to evaluate a patient's mobility both before and after undergoing TKA. The findings may serve as a summary of the advantages, disadvantages, and details of each assessment. The further integration of advanced functional technologies, such as markerless motion capture, holds promise for enhancing the accuracy and convenience of the analysis of function in these patients, and others in varied settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"108-B 3","pages":"274-281"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.108B3.BJJ-2025-0009.R1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Traditional methods of measuring patient satisfaction and improvement after total knee arthroplasy (TKA) rely on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), which are subjective and prone to recall bias. As a result, there has been a considerable recent increase in the use of objective functional assessments to quantify improvement in patients undergoing TKA. However, the functional assessments used in the literature are many and diverse. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate and synthesize all the objective methods of functional assessment which are recorded pre- and postoperatively, and used to measure improvement in these patients.

Methods: The review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies in English of patients who underwent TKA, in which at least one objective assessment of pre- and postoperative function was reported, were identified from a literature search on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases from their inception to 1 September 2024 and included. Subgroup analyses included gait analysis, motion analysis, walking tests, wearables/sensors, and strength tests.

Results: A total of 314 studies using 21 unique categories of functional assessment were included. The three most common methods of assessment were the Timed Up and Go test, traditional gait analysis, and the use of a dynamometer to quantify quadriceps strength. There has been a considerable increase in the use of functional assessments for patients undergoing TKA in recent years, with a wide range of tools being used to collect spatiotemporal, kinetic, and kinematic data.

Conclusion: This systematic review highlights the diversity of the functional assessments which are used to evaluate a patient's mobility both before and after undergoing TKA. The findings may serve as a summary of the advantages, disadvantages, and details of each assessment. The further integration of advanced functional technologies, such as markerless motion capture, holds promise for enhancing the accuracy and convenience of the analysis of function in these patients, and others in varied settings.

全膝关节置换术患者的功能评估:一项系统综述。
目的:测量全膝关节置换术(TKA)后患者满意度和改善的传统方法依赖于患者报告的结果测量(PROMs),这是主观的,容易产生回忆偏倚。因此,最近有相当多的人使用客观功能评估来量化接受TKA的患者的改善。然而,文献中使用的功能评估是多种多样的。本系统综述的目的是调查和综合术前和术后记录的所有客观功能评估方法,并用于衡量这些患者的改善情况。方法:按照PRISMA指南进行综述。从PubMed、Embase和Cochrane Central数据库从建立到2024年9月1日的文献检索中确定并纳入了接受TKA患者的符合条件的英文研究,其中至少有一项客观的术前和术后功能评估报告。亚组分析包括步态分析、运动分析、步行测试、可穿戴设备/传感器和力量测试。结果:共纳入314项研究,使用21种独特的功能评估类别。三种最常见的评估方法是Timed Up and Go测试、传统的步态分析和使用测力计量化股四头肌力量。近年来,对TKA患者进行功能评估的使用有了相当大的增加,使用了广泛的工具来收集时空、动力学和运动学数据。结论:本系统综述强调了功能评估的多样性,用于评估患者在接受TKA前后的活动能力。这些发现可以作为优点、缺点和每个评估细节的总结。进一步整合先进的功能技术,如无标记运动捕捉,有望提高这些患者和其他不同环境下功能分析的准确性和便利性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Journal
Bone & Joint Journal ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.90%
发文量
318
期刊介绍: We welcome original articles from any part of the world. The papers are assessed by members of the Editorial Board and our international panel of expert reviewers, then either accepted for publication or rejected by the Editor. We receive over 2000 submissions each year and accept about 250 for publication, many after revisions recommended by the reviewers, editors or statistical advisers. A decision usually takes between six and eight weeks. Each paper is assessed by two reviewers with a special interest in the subject covered by the paper, and also by members of the editorial team. Controversial papers will be discussed at a full meeting of the Editorial Board. Publication is between four and six months after acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书