Hidden Bias: Social Service Professionals' Attitudes toward Physical Disability.

IF 2.5 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL WORK
Social work Pub Date : 2026-04-01 DOI:10.1093/sw/swag006
Aleksa Owen, Carli Friedman
{"title":"Hidden Bias: Social Service Professionals' Attitudes toward Physical Disability.","authors":"Aleksa Owen, Carli Friedman","doi":"10.1093/sw/swag006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Implicit social cognition, also known as implicit bias, may impact social work practice. Because social workers commonly work with people with disabilities, it is important to understand more about social service professionals' attitudes about physical disability. By using descriptive and inferential statistical tests to quantitatively analyze secondary 2023 data from social service professionals, including social workers and counselors (n = 5,167), this study found that 70.3 percent of respondents reported having no explicit preference for people with or without physical disabilities, 23.7 percent reported preferring people without physical disabilities explicitly, and 6.0 percent reported preferring people with physical disabilities explicitly. For implicit attitudes, most participants had implicit preference for people without physical disabilities (77.8 percent), 13.7 percent had no implicit preference for people with or without physical disabilities, and 8.5 percent implicitly preferred people with physical disabilities. There was a statistically significant relationship between explicit and implicit attitudes, with most people having discordant explicit and implicit attitudes, often with low levels of explicit bias and high levels of implicit bias. This study also found age, gender, disability, having friends/family with disabilities, education, and political orientation correlated with explicit and implicit disability attitudes. The article ends with a discussion of educational interventions to reduce disability-related implicit bias.</p>","PeriodicalId":21875,"journal":{"name":"Social work","volume":" ","pages":"129-138"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social work","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swag006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Implicit social cognition, also known as implicit bias, may impact social work practice. Because social workers commonly work with people with disabilities, it is important to understand more about social service professionals' attitudes about physical disability. By using descriptive and inferential statistical tests to quantitatively analyze secondary 2023 data from social service professionals, including social workers and counselors (n = 5,167), this study found that 70.3 percent of respondents reported having no explicit preference for people with or without physical disabilities, 23.7 percent reported preferring people without physical disabilities explicitly, and 6.0 percent reported preferring people with physical disabilities explicitly. For implicit attitudes, most participants had implicit preference for people without physical disabilities (77.8 percent), 13.7 percent had no implicit preference for people with or without physical disabilities, and 8.5 percent implicitly preferred people with physical disabilities. There was a statistically significant relationship between explicit and implicit attitudes, with most people having discordant explicit and implicit attitudes, often with low levels of explicit bias and high levels of implicit bias. This study also found age, gender, disability, having friends/family with disabilities, education, and political orientation correlated with explicit and implicit disability attitudes. The article ends with a discussion of educational interventions to reduce disability-related implicit bias.

隐性偏见:社会服务专业人员对身体残疾的态度。
内隐社会认知,又称内隐偏见,可能会影响社会工作实践。因为社会工作者通常与残疾人一起工作,所以更多地了解社会服务专业人员对身体残疾的态度是很重要的。通过使用描述性和推断性统计检验对来自社会服务专业人员(包括社会工作者和咨询师)(n = 5167)的2023年二级数据进行定量分析,本研究发现,70.3%的受访者表示对有或没有身体残疾的人没有明确的偏好,23.7%的受访者表示明确偏爱没有身体残疾的人,6.0%的受访者明确偏爱身体残疾的人。在内隐态度上,77.8%的被试对无肢体残疾的人有内隐偏好,13.7%的被试对有或无肢体残疾的人没有内隐偏好,8.5%的被试对有肢体残疾的人有内隐偏好。外显态度和内隐态度之间存在显著的统计关系,大多数人的外显态度和内隐态度不一致,通常表现为低水平的外显偏见和高水平的内隐偏见。这项研究还发现,年龄、性别、残疾、是否有残疾的朋友/家人、教育程度和政治倾向与显性和隐性残疾态度相关。文章最后讨论了教育干预以减少残疾相关的内隐偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social work
Social work SOCIAL WORK-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书