Machine Learning in Assessing Intraoperative Blood Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Wenlin Zhou, Linglin Pan, Xinmei Pan, Yanwen Li, Lin Rao, Hong Li
{"title":"Machine Learning in Assessing Intraoperative Blood Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Wenlin Zhou,&nbsp;Linglin Pan,&nbsp;Xinmei Pan,&nbsp;Yanwen Li,&nbsp;Lin Rao,&nbsp;Hong Li","doi":"10.1111/inr.70159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the value of machine learning in assessing intraoperative blood loss by comparing associated outcomes with those of the gold standard.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Intraoperative bleeding is a leading cause of death in surgical patients and may be preventable through early and accurate assessment of blood loss. Machine learning models are used for measuring intraoperative hemorrhage with conventional assessment methods. However, outcome metrics vary across studies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A systematic review and meta-analysis. Data were retrieved from Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL, with searches conducted through August 18, 2025.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twelve studies were included. The pooled correlation coefficient between machine learning models and the gold standard for assessing intraoperative blood loss was high.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Machine learning models demonstrate high accuracy and reliability in assessing intraoperative blood loss. Heterogeneity was high, likely attributable to differences in publication year, country, study subjects, sample type, and modeling method.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Models should be promoted for clinical use to improve blood loss assessment accuracy and to potentially reduce perioperative risk.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications for Nursing</h3>\n \n <p>Novel machine learning models could enhance the accuracy and applicability of existing models, providing nursing staff with a more efficient tool for assessing blood loss. This will optimize the nursing decision-making process, reduce adverse events caused by underestimating or overestimating blood loss, and improve patient safety.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications for Nursing Policy</h3>\n \n <p>We provide a reference for exploring the application of artificial intelligence in other nursing fields, promoting interdisciplinary research and driving continuous innovation and progress in nursing.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54931,"journal":{"name":"International Nursing Review","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12949346/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Nursing Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inr.70159","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To evaluate the value of machine learning in assessing intraoperative blood loss by comparing associated outcomes with those of the gold standard.

Background

Intraoperative bleeding is a leading cause of death in surgical patients and may be preventable through early and accurate assessment of blood loss. Machine learning models are used for measuring intraoperative hemorrhage with conventional assessment methods. However, outcome metrics vary across studies.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis. Data were retrieved from Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL, with searches conducted through August 18, 2025.

Results

Twelve studies were included. The pooled correlation coefficient between machine learning models and the gold standard for assessing intraoperative blood loss was high.

Discussion

Machine learning models demonstrate high accuracy and reliability in assessing intraoperative blood loss. Heterogeneity was high, likely attributable to differences in publication year, country, study subjects, sample type, and modeling method.

Conclusion

Models should be promoted for clinical use to improve blood loss assessment accuracy and to potentially reduce perioperative risk.

Implications for Nursing

Novel machine learning models could enhance the accuracy and applicability of existing models, providing nursing staff with a more efficient tool for assessing blood loss. This will optimize the nursing decision-making process, reduce adverse events caused by underestimating or overestimating blood loss, and improve patient safety.

Implications for Nursing Policy

We provide a reference for exploring the application of artificial intelligence in other nursing fields, promoting interdisciplinary research and driving continuous innovation and progress in nursing.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

机器学习评估术中出血量:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:通过与金标准的相关结果进行比较,评价机器学习在评估术中出血量中的价值。背景:术中出血是外科患者死亡的主要原因,可以通过早期和准确的失血评估来预防。采用机器学习模型对术中出血进行常规评估。然而,不同研究的结果指标各不相同。方法:系统综述和荟萃分析。数据从Web of Science、PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library和CINAHL检索,检索时间截止到2025年8月18日。结果:纳入12项研究。机器学习模型与评估术中出血量的金标准之间的汇总相关系数很高。讨论:机器学习模型在评估术中出血量方面具有很高的准确性和可靠性。异质性较高,可能是由于出版年份、国家、研究对象、样本类型和建模方法的差异。结论:临床应推广模型,提高失血量评估的准确性,降低围手术期风险。对护理的影响:新的机器学习模型可以提高现有模型的准确性和适用性,为护理人员提供更有效的评估失血的工具。这将优化护理决策过程,减少因低估或高估失血量而引起的不良事件,提高患者安全。对护理政策的启示:为探索人工智能在其他护理领域的应用,促进跨学科研究,推动护理领域的不断创新与进步提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Nursing Review is a key resource for nurses world-wide. Articles are encouraged that reflect the ICN"s five key values: flexibility, inclusiveness, partnership, achievement and visionary leadership. Authors are encouraged to identify the relevance of local issues for the global community and to describe their work and to document their experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书