Safeguarding Social Determinants of Health Data at a Managed Health Plan.

Advances in health information science and practice Pub Date : 2026-02-12 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.63116/TLCI7167
Aurae Beidler, Kevin Rogers
{"title":"Safeguarding Social Determinants of Health Data at a Managed Health Plan.","authors":"Aurae Beidler, Kevin Rogers","doi":"10.63116/TLCI7167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Increased adoption of social determinants of health (SDOH) screening protocols by federal and state agencies to address health equity initiatives has led to an increase in the collection of new types of data by health care workers (HCWs). Although there is general consensus on the need for SDOH screening, issues such as a lack of standardization, patient distrust, and concerns over data security continue. Past studies have identified gaps in the methods of SDOH data collection, how the SDOH data is handled, training provided on collecting and safeguarding this type of information, and how to educate patients about how their information may be used. The authors designed this study to explore the perspectives and experiences of HCWs who access and use SDOH data to deliver care coordination for managed health plan members.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors used a mixed-methods methodology, quasi-experimental pre-post study to explore experiences and perspectives regarding data safeguards for SDOH data collected and accessed by HCWs at a managed health plan. Potential participants were selected from 2 divisions that provide care coordination and health-related service needs. The 18-item online survey contained both closed- and open-ended questions, with most using a Likert scale for responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey response rate was 14.1% (50). The authors found that 78.0% of the respondents were actively accessing and using SDOH data in their role. Of the 39 respondents who actively accessed and used SDOH data in their role, 23 (59.0%) respondents had been trained on how best to collect and use SDOH data, 6 (15.4%) respondents were unsure of receiving training, and 10 (25.6%) respondents had not received training. A majority (33 of 44; 75.0%) of the respondents understood that their department was collecting data directly from individual members regarding their SDOH/health-related social needs. When asked \"How certain are you that SDOH data is protected health information (PHI)?,\" there was an increase in mean and a decrease in standard deviation values when comparing the pre- and post-study answers to the same question. This indicates a shift toward higher numbers and less variability in results. The results showed that privacy and security training increased the level of confidence that HCWs have in safeguarding SDOH data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to the results of this study, HCW participants better understood how SDOH data is protected health information upon receiving training. The results also demonstrated that HCWs are eager and open to more training on safeguarding SDOH data. The findings of this study could be used to assess the current use of SDOH data, develop guidelines for best practices, and identify specific areas of training to ensure the privacy and security of SDOH data.</p>","PeriodicalId":521055,"journal":{"name":"Advances in health information science and practice","volume":"2 1","pages":"eTLCI7167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12933430/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in health information science and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.63116/TLCI7167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Increased adoption of social determinants of health (SDOH) screening protocols by federal and state agencies to address health equity initiatives has led to an increase in the collection of new types of data by health care workers (HCWs). Although there is general consensus on the need for SDOH screening, issues such as a lack of standardization, patient distrust, and concerns over data security continue. Past studies have identified gaps in the methods of SDOH data collection, how the SDOH data is handled, training provided on collecting and safeguarding this type of information, and how to educate patients about how their information may be used. The authors designed this study to explore the perspectives and experiences of HCWs who access and use SDOH data to deliver care coordination for managed health plan members.

Methods: The authors used a mixed-methods methodology, quasi-experimental pre-post study to explore experiences and perspectives regarding data safeguards for SDOH data collected and accessed by HCWs at a managed health plan. Potential participants were selected from 2 divisions that provide care coordination and health-related service needs. The 18-item online survey contained both closed- and open-ended questions, with most using a Likert scale for responses.

Results: The survey response rate was 14.1% (50). The authors found that 78.0% of the respondents were actively accessing and using SDOH data in their role. Of the 39 respondents who actively accessed and used SDOH data in their role, 23 (59.0%) respondents had been trained on how best to collect and use SDOH data, 6 (15.4%) respondents were unsure of receiving training, and 10 (25.6%) respondents had not received training. A majority (33 of 44; 75.0%) of the respondents understood that their department was collecting data directly from individual members regarding their SDOH/health-related social needs. When asked "How certain are you that SDOH data is protected health information (PHI)?," there was an increase in mean and a decrease in standard deviation values when comparing the pre- and post-study answers to the same question. This indicates a shift toward higher numbers and less variability in results. The results showed that privacy and security training increased the level of confidence that HCWs have in safeguarding SDOH data.

Conclusions: According to the results of this study, HCW participants better understood how SDOH data is protected health information upon receiving training. The results also demonstrated that HCWs are eager and open to more training on safeguarding SDOH data. The findings of this study could be used to assess the current use of SDOH data, develop guidelines for best practices, and identify specific areas of training to ensure the privacy and security of SDOH data.

在管理健康计划中保护健康数据的社会决定因素。
背景:联邦和州机构越来越多地采用健康社会决定因素(SDOH)筛查方案来解决卫生公平倡议,这导致卫生保健工作者(HCWs)收集新型数据的数量增加。尽管对SDOH筛查的必要性已达成普遍共识,但诸如缺乏标准化、患者不信任和对数据安全的担忧等问题仍在继续。过去的研究已经发现了SDOH数据收集方法、如何处理SDOH数据、提供关于收集和保护此类信息的培训以及如何教育患者如何使用他们的信息等方面的差距。作者设计这项研究是为了探索访问和使用SDOH数据为管理健康计划成员提供护理协调的卫生保健工作者的观点和经验。方法:作者采用混合方法,准实验前后研究,探讨管理健康计划中卫生保健工作者收集和访问的SDOH数据的数据保护经验和观点。从提供护理协调和健康相关服务需求的2个部门中选择潜在的参与者。这项在线调查共有18个问题,包括封闭式和开放式问题,大多数问题使用李克特量表进行回答。结果:调查回复率为14.1%(50例)。作者发现78.0%的受访者在其职位上积极访问和使用SDOH数据。在39名积极访问和使用SDOH数据的受访者中,23名(59.0%)受访者接受过如何最好地收集和使用SDOH数据的培训,6名(15.4%)受访者不确定是否接受过培训,10名(25.6%)受访者未接受过培训。大多数答复者(44人中有33人;75.0%)了解,他们的部门正在直接从个别成员那里收集有关其SDOH/与健康有关的社会需求的数据。当被问及“您有多确定SDOH数据是受保护的健康信息(PHI)?”,在比较研究前和研究后对同一问题的回答时,平均值增加,标准差值减少。这表明了向更高的数字和更少的结果变化的转变。结果表明,隐私和安全培训提高了医护人员保护SDOH数据的信心水平。结论:根据本研究的结果,HCW参与者在接受培训后更好地理解了SDOH数据是如何保护健康信息的。结果还表明,卫生保健工作者渴望并愿意接受更多关于保护SDOH数据的培训。本研究的结果可用于评估SDOH数据的当前使用情况,制定最佳实践指南,并确定特定的培训领域,以确保SDOH数据的隐私和安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书