Transcolonic Endoscopic Appendectomy: A Single-Step "Two-In-One" Approach for Recurrent Appendicitis With Appendiceal Orifice Lesions.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Journal of Digestive Diseases Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-27 DOI:10.1111/1751-2980.70040
Hao Wu, Zhu Kai Chen, Ai Ping Xu, Yuan Chu, Li Zhang, Jing Jing Lian, Tao Chen, Mei Dong Xu
{"title":"Transcolonic Endoscopic Appendectomy: A Single-Step \"Two-In-One\" Approach for Recurrent Appendicitis With Appendiceal Orifice Lesions.","authors":"Hao Wu, Zhu Kai Chen, Ai Ping Xu, Yuan Chu, Li Zhang, Jing Jing Lian, Tao Chen, Mei Dong Xu","doi":"10.1111/1751-2980.70040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Appendiceal orifice lesions are occasionally detected during colonoscopy in patients with recurrent appendicitis. Conventional surgery with partial cecal resection may cause unnecessary trauma. Transcolonic endoscopic appendectomy (TEA) has been proposed as a minimally invasive alternative. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of transcolonic endoscopic appendectomy and to compare through-the-scope twin clips (TTS-TC) combined with metal clips versus metal clips alone for defect closure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty patients with recurrent appendicitis and no prior abdominal surgery who underwent transcolonic endoscopic appendectomy between December 2020 and December 2024 were included. Clinical and pathological variables, procedural parameters, and follow-up outcomes were analyzed. TTS-TC plus metal clips and metal clips alone for defect closure were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All procedures were technically and clinically successful. Postoperative time to resume diet and length of hospital stay were 4.05 and 6.40 days, respectively. TTS-TC combined with metal clips reduced suture time (18 min [interquartile range {IQR} 15.5-20 min] vs. 25 min [IQR 20-30 min]), procedure time (85 min [IQR 72.5-92 min] vs. 115 min [IQR 110-124 min]), and number of clips used (7 [IQR 6.5-8] vs. 8 [IQR 7-9]) compared with metal clips alone. No adverse events were reported. Colonoscopy performed at 3 months post-procedure showed no residual lesions or recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TEA is a feasible, safe, and effective approach for recurrent appendicitis with orifice lesions. It provides a minimally invasive dual-benefit strategy and can be facilitated by a novel closure method to streamline the procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":15564,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Digestive Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"31-39"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13097961/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Digestive Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-2980.70040","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Appendiceal orifice lesions are occasionally detected during colonoscopy in patients with recurrent appendicitis. Conventional surgery with partial cecal resection may cause unnecessary trauma. Transcolonic endoscopic appendectomy (TEA) has been proposed as a minimally invasive alternative. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of transcolonic endoscopic appendectomy and to compare through-the-scope twin clips (TTS-TC) combined with metal clips versus metal clips alone for defect closure.

Methods: Twenty patients with recurrent appendicitis and no prior abdominal surgery who underwent transcolonic endoscopic appendectomy between December 2020 and December 2024 were included. Clinical and pathological variables, procedural parameters, and follow-up outcomes were analyzed. TTS-TC plus metal clips and metal clips alone for defect closure were compared.

Results: All procedures were technically and clinically successful. Postoperative time to resume diet and length of hospital stay were 4.05 and 6.40 days, respectively. TTS-TC combined with metal clips reduced suture time (18 min [interquartile range {IQR} 15.5-20 min] vs. 25 min [IQR 20-30 min]), procedure time (85 min [IQR 72.5-92 min] vs. 115 min [IQR 110-124 min]), and number of clips used (7 [IQR 6.5-8] vs. 8 [IQR 7-9]) compared with metal clips alone. No adverse events were reported. Colonoscopy performed at 3 months post-procedure showed no residual lesions or recurrence.

Conclusions: TEA is a feasible, safe, and effective approach for recurrent appendicitis with orifice lesions. It provides a minimally invasive dual-benefit strategy and can be facilitated by a novel closure method to streamline the procedure.

经结肠内镜阑尾切除术:一步“二合一”方法治疗复发性阑尾炎伴阑尾孔病变。
目的:阑尾复发性阑尾炎患者结肠镜检查时偶尔会发现阑尾口病变。盲肠部分切除的常规手术可能造成不必要的创伤。经结肠内镜阑尾切除术(TEA)被认为是一种微创的替代方法。我们的目的是评估经结肠内镜阑尾切除术的可行性、安全性和有效性,并比较经镜双夹(TTS-TC)联合金属夹与单独金属夹在闭合缺陷方面的效果。方法:选取2020年12月至2024年12月期间行经结肠内镜阑尾切除术的复发性阑尾炎患者20例,既往无腹部手术史。分析临床和病理变量、手术参数和随访结果。比较TTS-TC联合金属夹和单独金属夹修补缺陷的效果。结果:所有手术均取得技术和临床成功。术后恢复饮食时间为4.05天,住院时间为6.40天。TTS-TC联合金属夹与单独使用金属夹相比,缩短了缝合时间(18分钟[四分位数范围{IQR} 15.5-20分钟]比25分钟[IQR 20-30分钟])、手术时间(85分钟[IQR 72.5-92分钟]比115分钟[IQR 110-124分钟])和使用夹子的数量(7个[IQR 6.5-8]比8个[IQR 7-9])。无不良事件报告。术后3个月结肠镜检查未发现残留病变或复发。结论:TEA是治疗复发性阑尾炎伴孔口病变的一种可行、安全、有效的方法。它提供了一种微创的双重效益策略,并且可以通过一种新颖的闭合方法来简化手术过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Digestive Diseases
Journal of Digestive Diseases 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
81
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Digestive Diseases is the official English-language journal of the Chinese Society of Gastroenterology. The journal is published twelve times per year and includes peer-reviewed original papers, review articles and commentaries concerned with research relating to the esophagus, stomach, small intestine, colon, liver, biliary tract and pancreas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书