A simulation study to assess the influence of population pharmacokinetic model selection on Bayesian forecasting of vancomycin exposure in preterm neonates.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Mehdi El Hassani, Mathieu Blouin, Van Dong Nguyen, Alexandre Duong, Amélie Marsot
{"title":"A simulation study to assess the influence of population pharmacokinetic model selection on Bayesian forecasting of vancomycin exposure in preterm neonates.","authors":"Mehdi El Hassani, Mathieu Blouin, Van Dong Nguyen, Alexandre Duong, Amélie Marsot","doi":"10.1080/17512433.2026.2639035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Discrepancies in vancomycin AUC24 estimates across population pharmacokinetic (popPK) models raise concerns about their impact on dosing recommendations and probability of target attainment (PTA) after multiple therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) occasions. This study assesses model selection's impact on model-based dosing and PTA following simulated TDM occasions and explores predictors of PTA.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Using a virtual neonatal population and 15 validated vancomycin popPK models, TDM events were simulated with initial dosing, followed by Bayesian-guided adjustments over three TDM occasions. The number of non-therapeutic patients was compared across models, and associations between model characteristics and simulated PTA were explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across models, geometric mean (gMean) AUC24 values varied: 496 mg·h/L (35.7% geometric coefficient of variation, gCV) for the first TDM, 570 mg·h/L (53.1% gCV) for the second, and 484 mg·h/L (62.2% gCV) for the third. Non-therapeutic patients ranged from 0 (Mulubwa et al.) to 530 (Allegaert et al.). Interindividual variability in clearance correlated with non-therapeutic patients (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.88), while residual variability showed no correlation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Model selection affects simulated vancomycin AUC24 values and PTA in neonates, influencing dosing decisions. These findings highlight model characteristics correlating with target attainment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12207,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"275-287"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17512433.2026.2639035","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Discrepancies in vancomycin AUC24 estimates across population pharmacokinetic (popPK) models raise concerns about their impact on dosing recommendations and probability of target attainment (PTA) after multiple therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) occasions. This study assesses model selection's impact on model-based dosing and PTA following simulated TDM occasions and explores predictors of PTA.

Research design and methods: Using a virtual neonatal population and 15 validated vancomycin popPK models, TDM events were simulated with initial dosing, followed by Bayesian-guided adjustments over three TDM occasions. The number of non-therapeutic patients was compared across models, and associations between model characteristics and simulated PTA were explored.

Results: Across models, geometric mean (gMean) AUC24 values varied: 496 mg·h/L (35.7% geometric coefficient of variation, gCV) for the first TDM, 570 mg·h/L (53.1% gCV) for the second, and 484 mg·h/L (62.2% gCV) for the third. Non-therapeutic patients ranged from 0 (Mulubwa et al.) to 530 (Allegaert et al.). Interindividual variability in clearance correlated with non-therapeutic patients (R2 = 0.88), while residual variability showed no correlation.

Conclusion: Model selection affects simulated vancomycin AUC24 values and PTA in neonates, influencing dosing decisions. These findings highlight model characteristics correlating with target attainment.

评估群体药代动力学模型选择对早产儿万古霉素暴露贝叶斯预测影响的模拟研究。
背景:人群药代动力学(popPK)模型中万古霉素AUC24估计值的差异引起了人们对其在多次治疗药物监测(TDM)后对剂量建议和目标实现概率(PTA)的影响的关注。本研究评估了模型选择对基于模型的剂量和PTA在模拟TDM场合的影响,并探讨了PTA的预测因子。研究设计和方法:使用虚拟新生儿群体和15个经过验证的万古霉素popk模型,通过初始剂量模拟TDM事件,然后在三次TDM事件中进行贝叶斯指导调整。对不同模型的非治疗患者数量进行比较,并探讨模型特征与模拟PTA之间的关系。结果:不同模型的AUC24几何平均(gMean)值不同:第一种TDM为496 mg·h/L(几何变异系数,gCV),第二种为570 mg·h/L(几何变异系数,gCV),第三种为484 mg·h/L(几何变异系数,gCV)。非治疗患者从0 (Mulubwa等人)到530 (alleaert等人)不等。清除率的个体间变异性与非治疗患者相关(R2 = 0.88),而剩余变异性无相关性。结论:模型选择影响新生儿万古霉素模拟AUC24值和PTA,影响给药决策。这些发现突出了与目标实现相关的模型特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology
Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Advances in drug development technologies are yielding innovative new therapies, from potentially lifesaving medicines to lifestyle products. In recent years, however, the cost of developing new drugs has soared, and concerns over drug resistance and pharmacoeconomics have come to the fore. Adverse reactions experienced at the clinical trial level serve as a constant reminder of the importance of rigorous safety and toxicity testing. Furthermore the advent of pharmacogenomics and ‘individualized’ approaches to therapy will demand a fresh approach to drug evaluation and healthcare delivery. Clinical Pharmacology provides an essential role in integrating the expertise of all of the specialists and players who are active in meeting such challenges in modern biomedical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书