Endoscopic Transpapillary Gallbladder Drainage Reduces the Frequency of Biliopancreatic Events in the Waiting Period for Surgery, Even in Patients without Comorbid Diseases.
Yavuz Emre Parlar, Bengi Öztürk, Onur Keskin, Taylan Kav, Erkan Parlak
{"title":"Endoscopic Transpapillary Gallbladder Drainage Reduces the Frequency of Biliopancreatic Events in the Waiting Period for Surgery, Even in Patients without Comorbid Diseases.","authors":"Yavuz Emre Parlar, Bengi Öztürk, Onur Keskin, Taylan Kav, Erkan Parlak","doi":"10.1159/000551128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In patients with acute cholecystitis and choledocholithiasis undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) followed by interval cholecystectomy (6 weeks-3 months), preoperative biliopancreatic events are reported in 18.3-41.8%. Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (ET-GBD) is indicated in this patient group if there are comorbidities preventing surgery. This study compared biliopancreatic events during the interval to cholecystectomy in patients who underwent ET-GBD despite being surgically fit versus those treated with ERCP alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study conducted between 2018 and 2023, 121 patients with cholecystitis secondary to choledocholithiasis underwent ERCP. Surgical candidates expected to undergo delayed cholecystectomy were divided into two groups: those who received ET-GBD (study group) and those who did not (control group, from the first half of the study period).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ET-GBD group had a mean age of 54.54 (56.7% female), while the non-ET-GBD group had a mean age of 63.18 (50% female). During the waiting period, biliopancreatic events occurred in 1/34 (2.9%) of ET-GBD patients versus 18/34 (52.9%) of controls (absolute risk reduction: 50.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 21.8-68.0; relative risk: 0.056, 95% CI: 0.0079-0.39; p < 0.001). Specifically, biliary colic (2.9% vs. 47.1%; p < 0.001), cholecystitis (0% vs. 17.6%; p = 0.009), and choledocholithiasis (0% vs. 26.4%; p = 0.001) were significantly less frequent in the ET-GBD group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ET-GBD was associated with significantly lower biliopancreatic complications during the interval to surgery in operable patients with acute cholecystitis and choledocholithiasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":11315,"journal":{"name":"Digestion","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000551128","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: In patients with acute cholecystitis and choledocholithiasis undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) followed by interval cholecystectomy (6 weeks-3 months), preoperative biliopancreatic events are reported in 18.3-41.8%. Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (ET-GBD) is indicated in this patient group if there are comorbidities preventing surgery. This study compared biliopancreatic events during the interval to cholecystectomy in patients who underwent ET-GBD despite being surgically fit versus those treated with ERCP alone.
Methods: In this retrospective study conducted between 2018 and 2023, 121 patients with cholecystitis secondary to choledocholithiasis underwent ERCP. Surgical candidates expected to undergo delayed cholecystectomy were divided into two groups: those who received ET-GBD (study group) and those who did not (control group, from the first half of the study period).
Results: The ET-GBD group had a mean age of 54.54 (56.7% female), while the non-ET-GBD group had a mean age of 63.18 (50% female). During the waiting period, biliopancreatic events occurred in 1/34 (2.9%) of ET-GBD patients versus 18/34 (52.9%) of controls (absolute risk reduction: 50.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 21.8-68.0; relative risk: 0.056, 95% CI: 0.0079-0.39; p < 0.001). Specifically, biliary colic (2.9% vs. 47.1%; p < 0.001), cholecystitis (0% vs. 17.6%; p = 0.009), and choledocholithiasis (0% vs. 26.4%; p = 0.001) were significantly less frequent in the ET-GBD group.
Conclusion: ET-GBD was associated with significantly lower biliopancreatic complications during the interval to surgery in operable patients with acute cholecystitis and choledocholithiasis.
背景和目的:急性胆囊炎和胆总管结石患者行内镜逆行胆管造影(ERCP)后行间歇胆囊切除术(6周-3个月),术前胆管事件发生率为18.3-41.8%。内镜下经乳头胆囊引流术(ET-GBD)适用于有合并症的患者。本研究比较了手术适应的ET-GBD患者与单独接受ERCP治疗的患者在胆囊切除术期间的胆胰事件。方法:在2018年至2023年进行的一项回顾性研究中,121例胆管结石继发性胆囊炎患者接受了ERCP。预期接受延迟胆囊切除术的手术候选人分为两组:接受ET-GBD治疗的患者(研究组)和未接受ET-GBD治疗的患者(对照组,研究前半期开始)。结果:ET-GBD组平均年龄为54.54岁(56.7%为女性),非ET-GBD组平均年龄为63.18岁(50%为女性)。在等待期间,1/34(2.9%)的ET-GBD患者发生胆胰事件,而对照组为18/34(52.9%)(绝对风险降低50.0%,95% CI 21.8-68.0;相对风险0.056,95% CI 0.0079-0.39; p < 0.001)。具体来说,胆绞痛(2.9% vs. 47.1%, p < 0.001)、胆囊炎(0% vs. 17.6%, p = 0.009)和胆总管结石(0% vs. 26.4%, p = 0.001)在ET-GBD组的发生率显著降低。结论:急性胆囊炎合并胆总管结石可手术患者行ET-GBD手术间隔期胆胰并发症明显降低。
期刊介绍:
''Digestion'' concentrates on clinical research reports: in addition to editorials and reviews, the journal features sections on Stomach/Esophagus, Bowel, Neuro-Gastroenterology, Liver/Bile, Pancreas, Metabolism/Nutrition and Gastrointestinal Oncology. Papers cover physiology in humans, metabolic studies and clinical work on the etiology, diagnosis, and therapy of human diseases. It is thus especially cut out for gastroenterologists employed in hospitals and outpatient units. Moreover, the journal''s coverage of studies on the metabolism and effects of therapeutic drugs carries considerable value for clinicians and investigators beyond the immediate field of gastroenterology.