Prognostic Value of Hemoglobin, Albumin, Lymphocyte, and Platelet Score in Predicting Mortality in Patients With Aortic Dissection: A Retrospective Single-Center Study Based on ROC Curve Analysis.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Emergency Medicine International Pub Date : 2026-02-24 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1155/emmi/6996031
Canan Şahin, Yahya Şahin
{"title":"Prognostic Value of Hemoglobin, Albumin, Lymphocyte, and Platelet Score in Predicting Mortality in Patients With Aortic Dissection: A Retrospective Single-Center Study Based on ROC Curve Analysis.","authors":"Canan Şahin, Yahya Şahin","doi":"10.1155/emmi/6996031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aortic dissection (AD) is a life-threatening cardiovascular emergency associated with high mortality. Early risk stratification through reliable biomarkers is critical for guiding clinical decisions. The hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet (HALP) score is a novel composite index reflecting inflammation, nutritional status, and hematologic balance. Although it has shown prognostic relevance in several disease states, its utility in predicting mortality in AD remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of the HALP score and other hematologic markers in patients with AD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 51 patients diagnosed with AD between January 2020 and December 2024 using contrast-enhanced thoracoabdominal computed tomography. Patients were grouped as survivors or nonsurvivors. Hematologic parameters (hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell, platelet count, and mean platelet volume) and inflammatory indices (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR], platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio [PLR], systemic immune-inflammation index [SII], and HALP score) were recorded. The Shapiro-Wilk test assessed normality; Student's <i>t</i>-test or the Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test was applied accordingly. ROC analysis was performed to evaluate the predictive power of each parameter. Statistical significance was defined as <i>p</i> < 0.05. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall mortality was 33.3%. Nonsurvivors were older and had significantly lower levels of hemoglobin, hematocrit, RBC, and platelet count (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The HALP score was lower in the exitus group, though not statistically significant in direct comparison (<i>p</i> = 0.549). ROC analysis revealed that the HALP score had an AUC of 0.715 (95% CI: 0.572-0.857, <i>p</i> = 0.003), with 55.9% sensitivity and 82.4% specificity at a cutoff of 4.05. Classical parameters such as RBC (AUC = 0.824), Hgb (AUC = 0.802), and Htc (AUC = 0.811) demonstrated stronger predictive capacity. The in-hospital mortality rate was 33.3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The HALP score demonstrated high specificity and moderate sensitivity in predicting mortality in AD, suggesting its potential as a complementary biomarker. Its ease of use and accessibility make it suitable for emergency clinical settings. Prospective multicenter studies are needed to confirm its prognostic validity and routine application in AD management.</p>","PeriodicalId":11528,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine International","volume":"2026 ","pages":"6996031"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12930098/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/emmi/6996031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Aortic dissection (AD) is a life-threatening cardiovascular emergency associated with high mortality. Early risk stratification through reliable biomarkers is critical for guiding clinical decisions. The hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet (HALP) score is a novel composite index reflecting inflammation, nutritional status, and hematologic balance. Although it has shown prognostic relevance in several disease states, its utility in predicting mortality in AD remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of the HALP score and other hematologic markers in patients with AD.

Methods: This retrospective study included 51 patients diagnosed with AD between January 2020 and December 2024 using contrast-enhanced thoracoabdominal computed tomography. Patients were grouped as survivors or nonsurvivors. Hematologic parameters (hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell, platelet count, and mean platelet volume) and inflammatory indices (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR], platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio [PLR], systemic immune-inflammation index [SII], and HALP score) were recorded. The Shapiro-Wilk test assessed normality; Student's t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test was applied accordingly. ROC analysis was performed to evaluate the predictive power of each parameter. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.

Results: Overall mortality was 33.3%. Nonsurvivors were older and had significantly lower levels of hemoglobin, hematocrit, RBC, and platelet count (p < 0.001). The HALP score was lower in the exitus group, though not statistically significant in direct comparison (p = 0.549). ROC analysis revealed that the HALP score had an AUC of 0.715 (95% CI: 0.572-0.857, p = 0.003), with 55.9% sensitivity and 82.4% specificity at a cutoff of 4.05. Classical parameters such as RBC (AUC = 0.824), Hgb (AUC = 0.802), and Htc (AUC = 0.811) demonstrated stronger predictive capacity. The in-hospital mortality rate was 33.3%.

Conclusions: The HALP score demonstrated high specificity and moderate sensitivity in predicting mortality in AD, suggesting its potential as a complementary biomarker. Its ease of use and accessibility make it suitable for emergency clinical settings. Prospective multicenter studies are needed to confirm its prognostic validity and routine application in AD management.

血红蛋白、白蛋白、淋巴细胞和血小板评分预测主动脉夹层患者死亡率的预后价值:基于ROC曲线分析的回顾性单中心研究。
背景:主动脉夹层(Aortic夹层,AD)是一种危及生命的心血管急症,死亡率高。通过可靠的生物标志物进行早期风险分层对于指导临床决策至关重要。血红蛋白、白蛋白、淋巴细胞和血小板(HALP)评分是一种反映炎症、营养状况和血液平衡的新型复合指标。尽管它已显示出与几种疾病状态的预后相关,但其在预测AD死亡率方面的效用仍不清楚。本研究旨在探讨HALP评分和其他血液学指标在AD患者中的预后价值。方法:本回顾性研究纳入了51例在2020年1月至2024年12月期间使用增强胸腹计算机断层扫描诊断为AD的患者。患者分为幸存者和非幸存者。记录血液学参数(血红蛋白、血细胞比容、红细胞、血小板计数、平均血小板体积)和炎症指标(中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值[NLR]、血小板与淋巴细胞比值[PLR]、全身免疫炎症指数[SII]、HALP评分)。夏皮罗-威尔克检验评估正态性;采用学生t检验或Mann-Whitney U检验。采用ROC分析评估各参数的预测能力。p < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。主要终点是住院死亡率。结果:总死亡率为33.3%。非幸存者年龄较大,血红蛋白、红细胞压积、红细胞和血小板计数水平明显较低(p < 0.001)。出口组的HALP评分较低,但直接比较无统计学意义(p = 0.549)。ROC分析显示,HALP评分的AUC为0.715 (95% CI: 0.572-0.857, p = 0.003),敏感性为55.9%,特异性为82.4%,截止值为4.05。经典参数RBC (AUC = 0.824)、Hgb (AUC = 0.802)、Htc (AUC = 0.811)的预测能力较强。住院死亡率为33.3%。结论:HALP评分在预测阿尔茨海默病死亡率方面具有高特异性和中等敏感性,提示其作为一种补充性生物标志物的潜力。它的易用性和可访问性使其适合于紧急临床设置。需要前瞻性的多中心研究来证实其预后有效性和在AD治疗中的常规应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine International
Emergency Medicine International EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
187
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Emergency Medicine International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for doctors, nurses, paramedics and ambulance staff. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to prehospital care, disaster preparedness and response, acute medical and paediatric emergencies, critical care, sports medicine, wound care, and toxicology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书