Exercise therapy for kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis with a focus on exercise type.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-25 DOI:10.1007/s10157-026-02836-7
Noriyuki Kounoue, Shintaro Ochiai, Masahiko Yazawa, Tadashi Sofue, Naohiko Fujii, Masakazu Saitoh, Ichiei Narita, Kunihiro Yamagata, Junichi Hoshino, Hideyo Oguchi
{"title":"Exercise therapy for kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis with a focus on exercise type.","authors":"Noriyuki Kounoue, Shintaro Ochiai, Masahiko Yazawa, Tadashi Sofue, Naohiko Fujii, Masakazu Saitoh, Ichiei Narita, Kunihiro Yamagata, Junichi Hoshino, Hideyo Oguchi","doi":"10.1007/s10157-026-02836-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exercise therapy is important for exercise tolerance, for the prevention of frailty or sarcopenia, and to improve quality of life (QOL). Previous studies, including systematic reviews, have shown the efficacy of exercise therapy for kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), but the optimal types of exercise remain unclear. Therefore, we aimed to synthesize the published evidence and compare the efficacy of types of exercise.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched for randomized controlled trials of the efficacy of exercise therapy in KTRs on PubMed and Ichushi, then performed a meta-analysis. Exercise was categorized as aerobic training (AT), resistance training (RT), or AT + RT. The risk of bias was assessed using ROB2 and the certainty of the evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five studies were included in the study and 18 in the meta-analysis. Exercise was associated with significant improvements in QOL (SF-36 physical functioning score), cardiorespiratory function (VO<sub>2</sub>peak), physical function (performance in the 6-min walk test (6MWT) and sit/stand test (STS)), and a metabolic index (triglyceride concentration). Kidney function tended to be superior in the exercise group, but the difference was not significant. Other indices of glucose and lipid metabolism and the incidence of hospitalization did not differ between the Exercise and Control groups. AT + RT significantly improved VO<sub>2</sub>peak, 6MWT performance, and the triglyceride concentration, whereas AT alone did not improve VO<sub>2</sub>peak and RT alone did not improve 6MWT performance or the triglyceride concentration. The certainty of the evidence was generally \"low\" or \"very low\".</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exercise therapy improved the QOL, cardiorespiratory function, physical function, and triglyceride concentration of KTRs. The AT + RT combination may be the most effective exercise therapy for such patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10349,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"792-809"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-026-02836-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Exercise therapy is important for exercise tolerance, for the prevention of frailty or sarcopenia, and to improve quality of life (QOL). Previous studies, including systematic reviews, have shown the efficacy of exercise therapy for kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), but the optimal types of exercise remain unclear. Therefore, we aimed to synthesize the published evidence and compare the efficacy of types of exercise.

Methods: We systematically searched for randomized controlled trials of the efficacy of exercise therapy in KTRs on PubMed and Ichushi, then performed a meta-analysis. Exercise was categorized as aerobic training (AT), resistance training (RT), or AT + RT. The risk of bias was assessed using ROB2 and the certainty of the evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach.

Results: Twenty-five studies were included in the study and 18 in the meta-analysis. Exercise was associated with significant improvements in QOL (SF-36 physical functioning score), cardiorespiratory function (VO2peak), physical function (performance in the 6-min walk test (6MWT) and sit/stand test (STS)), and a metabolic index (triglyceride concentration). Kidney function tended to be superior in the exercise group, but the difference was not significant. Other indices of glucose and lipid metabolism and the incidence of hospitalization did not differ between the Exercise and Control groups. AT + RT significantly improved VO2peak, 6MWT performance, and the triglyceride concentration, whereas AT alone did not improve VO2peak and RT alone did not improve 6MWT performance or the triglyceride concentration. The certainty of the evidence was generally "low" or "very low".

Conclusion: Exercise therapy improved the QOL, cardiorespiratory function, physical function, and triglyceride concentration of KTRs. The AT + RT combination may be the most effective exercise therapy for such patients.

肾移植受者的运动治疗:一项以运动类型为重点的系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:运动疗法对于运动耐量、预防虚弱或肌肉减少症以及提高生活质量(QOL)非常重要。以前的研究,包括系统综述,已经显示了运动疗法对肾移植受者(KTRs)的疗效,但最佳的运动类型仍不清楚。因此,我们旨在综合已发表的证据并比较不同类型运动的功效。方法:我们系统地检索PubMed和Ichushi上关于运动疗法对KTRs疗效的随机对照试验,然后进行meta分析。运动分为有氧训练(AT)、阻力训练(RT)或AT + RT。使用ROB2评估偏倚风险,使用GRADE方法评估证据的确定性。结果:本研究纳入25项研究,meta分析纳入18项研究。运动与生活质量(SF-36身体功能评分)、心肺功能(vo2峰值)、身体功能(6分钟步行测试(6MWT)和坐/站测试(STS)的表现)和代谢指数(甘油三酯浓度)的显著改善相关。运动组的肾功能有较好的趋势,但差异不显著。其他指标的糖脂代谢和住院率在运动组和对照组之间没有差异。AT + RT显著提高了VO2peak、6MWT性能和甘油三酯浓度,而单独AT和RT没有改善VO2peak和6MWT性能或甘油三酯浓度。证据的确定性一般为“低”或“非常低”。结论:运动治疗可改善ktr患者的生活质量、心肺功能、身体功能和甘油三酯浓度。AT + RT联合可能是这类患者最有效的运动疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
135
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Nephrology is a peer-reviewed monthly journal, officially published by the Japanese Society of Nephrology (JSN) to provide an international forum for the discussion of research and issues relating to the study of nephrology. Out of respect for the founders of the JSN, the title of this journal uses the term “nephrology,” a word created and brought into use with the establishment of the JSN (Japanese Journal of Nephrology, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1960). The journal publishes articles on all aspects of nephrology, including basic, experimental, and clinical research, so as to share the latest research findings and ideas not only with members of the JSN, but with all researchers who wish to contribute to a better understanding of recent advances in nephrology. The journal is unique in that it introduces to an international readership original reports from Japan and also the clinical standards discussed and agreed by JSN.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书