Explainable AI for mortality prediction: a comparative study using the MIMIC-III dataset.

IF 6.2 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Niusha Shafiabady, Dave Akume, Mohammadreza Haghighat, Fareed Ud Din, Kabir Sattarshetty, Asif Karim, Jianlong Zhou, Ethar Alsharaydeh
{"title":"Explainable AI for mortality prediction: a comparative study using the MIMIC-III dataset.","authors":"Niusha Shafiabady, Dave Akume, Mohammadreza Haghighat, Fareed Ud Din, Kabir Sattarshetty, Asif Karim, Jianlong Zhou, Ethar Alsharaydeh","doi":"10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Predicting mortality is vital for tailoring treatments, improving care and reducing costs. Machine learning (ML) has shown strong potential, often outperforming traditional severity-of-illness scoring systems in intensive care units (ICUs). However, the black-box nature of ML limits adoption. This study evaluates the accuracy of several ML algorithms on the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) dataset and applies explainable artificial intelligence to identify variables influencing ICU mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort of 600 MIMIC-III patient records was analysed. ML algorithms tested included support vector machine (SVM), K-nearest neighbour (KNN), decision trees (DT), gradient boosting (GB), random forests (RF), Naive Bayes (NB), logistic regression (LR) and extra trees (ET). Models were assessed with threefold cross-validation using F1 Score, sensitivity, specificity, confusion matrix and accuracy. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was applied to explain key factors influencing predictions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the eight algorithms evaluated, ET and GB achieved the highest accuracy (98.33% and 98.23%, respectively) with F1-scores above 96%. SVM also performed strongly (97.50% accuracy, F1=94.34%). RF and DT yielded accuracies of 95.00% and 94.17%, respectively. NB reached 96.67% accuracy with 100% recall, while KNN and LR showed lower discriminative performance (76.67% and 75.83% accuracy, respectively).SHAP, LIME and Shapley values consistently identified hypertension, tumours and endocrine and digestive disease as the leading predictors of mortality.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings highlight ML's potential to optimise ICU decision-making and support clinicians. However, reliance on retrospective data remains a limitation, and clinical validation is required.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ML algorithms are highly effective for mortality prediction, and explainability is key for trust and adoption. When combined, accuracy and interpretability enable ML to safely support informed ICU decisions and improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9050,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12959059/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Predicting mortality is vital for tailoring treatments, improving care and reducing costs. Machine learning (ML) has shown strong potential, often outperforming traditional severity-of-illness scoring systems in intensive care units (ICUs). However, the black-box nature of ML limits adoption. This study evaluates the accuracy of several ML algorithms on the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) dataset and applies explainable artificial intelligence to identify variables influencing ICU mortality.

Methods: A retrospective cohort of 600 MIMIC-III patient records was analysed. ML algorithms tested included support vector machine (SVM), K-nearest neighbour (KNN), decision trees (DT), gradient boosting (GB), random forests (RF), Naive Bayes (NB), logistic regression (LR) and extra trees (ET). Models were assessed with threefold cross-validation using F1 Score, sensitivity, specificity, confusion matrix and accuracy. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was applied to explain key factors influencing predictions.

Results: Among the eight algorithms evaluated, ET and GB achieved the highest accuracy (98.33% and 98.23%, respectively) with F1-scores above 96%. SVM also performed strongly (97.50% accuracy, F1=94.34%). RF and DT yielded accuracies of 95.00% and 94.17%, respectively. NB reached 96.67% accuracy with 100% recall, while KNN and LR showed lower discriminative performance (76.67% and 75.83% accuracy, respectively).SHAP, LIME and Shapley values consistently identified hypertension, tumours and endocrine and digestive disease as the leading predictors of mortality.

Discussion: Findings highlight ML's potential to optimise ICU decision-making and support clinicians. However, reliance on retrospective data remains a limitation, and clinical validation is required.

Conclusion: ML algorithms are highly effective for mortality prediction, and explainability is key for trust and adoption. When combined, accuracy and interpretability enable ML to safely support informed ICU decisions and improve patient outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

可解释的人工智能死亡率预测:使用MIMIC-III数据集的比较研究。
目的:预测死亡率对调整治疗、改善护理和降低费用至关重要。机器学习(ML)已经显示出强大的潜力,通常在重症监护病房(icu)中优于传统的疾病严重程度评分系统。然而,机器学习的黑箱特性限制了它的采用。本研究评估了重症监护医学信息市场III (MIMIC-III)数据集上几种ML算法的准确性,并应用可解释的人工智能来识别影响ICU死亡率的变量。方法:对600例MIMIC-III患者进行回顾性队列分析。测试的机器学习算法包括支持向量机(SVM)、k近邻(KNN)、决策树(DT)、梯度增强(GB)、随机森林(RF)、朴素贝叶斯(NB)、逻辑回归(LR)和额外树(ET)。采用F1评分、敏感性、特异性、混淆矩阵和准确性对模型进行三重交叉验证。采用SHapley加性解释(SHAP)解释影响预测的关键因素。结果:在评估的8种算法中,ET和GB的准确率最高(分别为98.33%和98.23%),f1得分均在96%以上。SVM表现也很好(准确率97.50%,F1=94.34%)。RF和DT的准确度分别为95.00%和94.17%。NB的准确率达到96.67%,召回率为100%,而KNN和LR的区分准确率较低,分别为76.67%和75.83%。SHAP、LIME和Shapley值一致认为高血压、肿瘤、内分泌和消化系统疾病是死亡率的主要预测因素。讨论:研究结果强调ML在优化ICU决策和支持临床医生方面的潜力。然而,对回顾性数据的依赖仍然有局限性,需要临床验证。结论:ML算法对死亡率预测是非常有效的,可解释性是信任和采用的关键。当结合使用时,准确性和可解释性使ML能够安全地支持ICU的明智决策并改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
40
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书