SHIELD: System for Harmful Explicit-Content Identification and Evaluation Through LLM-Driven Approach

IF 4.2 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Dishant Kapoor;Karan Ahuja;Deepika Kumar;Paanav Puri;Srinivas Jangirala;Vedika Gupta;Anandadeep Mandal
{"title":"SHIELD: System for Harmful Explicit-Content Identification and Evaluation Through LLM-Driven Approach","authors":"Dishant Kapoor;Karan Ahuja;Deepika Kumar;Paanav Puri;Srinivas Jangirala;Vedika Gupta;Anandadeep Mandal","doi":"10.1109/ACCESS.2026.3667099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The surge in access to explicit content across various platforms has sparked major concerns, yet existing content filtering systems find it difficult to analyze different media formats leading to the spread of unchecked dissemination of harmful content. To tackle these shortcomings, the authors proposed SHIELD, which is an optimized end-to-end pipeline to detect & analyze explicit content, using a large-language-model (LLM) driven approach. SHIELD processes multi media inputs by segregating and preprocessing them, followed by converting all formats into text through advanced models, extracting meaningful textual context and subjecting the resulting data to two parallel evaluation mechanisms: an LLM-based classifier for contextual analysis, and a semantic vector-based scoring system for quantitative measurement. Explicitness classifications are output in a JSON format, which allows easy integration into real-world systems. When benchmarked against a manually curated ground truth dataset, the LLM-based system surpasses vector-based approach, with an accuracy of 93.32%, as against 67.81%. The pipeline shows robustness across all media types and file sizes, confirming its viability as a scalable, context-aware solution.","PeriodicalId":13079,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Access","volume":"14 ","pages":"29493-29522"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11406083","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Access","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11406083/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The surge in access to explicit content across various platforms has sparked major concerns, yet existing content filtering systems find it difficult to analyze different media formats leading to the spread of unchecked dissemination of harmful content. To tackle these shortcomings, the authors proposed SHIELD, which is an optimized end-to-end pipeline to detect & analyze explicit content, using a large-language-model (LLM) driven approach. SHIELD processes multi media inputs by segregating and preprocessing them, followed by converting all formats into text through advanced models, extracting meaningful textual context and subjecting the resulting data to two parallel evaluation mechanisms: an LLM-based classifier for contextual analysis, and a semantic vector-based scoring system for quantitative measurement. Explicitness classifications are output in a JSON format, which allows easy integration into real-world systems. When benchmarked against a manually curated ground truth dataset, the LLM-based system surpasses vector-based approach, with an accuracy of 93.32%, as against 67.81%. The pipeline shows robustness across all media types and file sizes, confirming its viability as a scalable, context-aware solution.
SHIELD:通过法学硕士驱动的方法进行有害明确内容识别和评估的系统
各种平台上对露露内容的访问激增引发了重大关注,然而现有的内容过滤系统发现很难分析不同的媒体格式,导致有害内容的不受控制的传播。为了解决这些缺点,作者提出了SHIELD,这是一个优化的端到端管道,用于检测和分析显式内容,使用大语言模型(LLM)驱动的方法。SHIELD对多媒体输入进行分离和预处理,然后通过高级模型将所有格式转换为文本,提取有意义的文本上下文,并将结果数据置于两种并行评估机制中:基于llm的上下文分析分类器和基于语义向量的定量测量评分系统。显式分类以JSON格式输出,这允许轻松集成到实际系统中。当与人工编制的地面真实数据集进行基准测试时,基于llm的系统优于基于向量的方法,准确率为93.32%,而基于向量的方法的准确率为67.81%。该管道在所有媒体类型和文件大小上都显示出健壮性,证实了它作为可扩展的、上下文感知的解决方案的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Access
IEEE Access COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMSENGIN-ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6673
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: IEEE Access® is a multidisciplinary, open access (OA), applications-oriented, all-electronic archival journal that continuously presents the results of original research or development across all of IEEE''s fields of interest. IEEE Access will publish articles that are of high interest to readers, original, technically correct, and clearly presented. Supported by author publication charges (APC), its hallmarks are a rapid peer review and publication process with open access to all readers. Unlike IEEE''s traditional Transactions or Journals, reviews are "binary", in that reviewers will either Accept or Reject an article in the form it is submitted in order to achieve rapid turnaround. Especially encouraged are submissions on: Multidisciplinary topics, or applications-oriented articles and negative results that do not fit within the scope of IEEE''s traditional journals. Practical articles discussing new experiments or measurement techniques, interesting solutions to engineering. Development of new or improved fabrication or manufacturing techniques. Reviews or survey articles of new or evolving fields oriented to assist others in understanding the new area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书