Staff experiences of percutaneous tracheostomy in intensive care: challenges, complications and potential solutions

IF 0.8 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
M. Moran, A. Goryanyy, A. Haron, C. Jay, A. Weightman, B. McGrath, C. Shelton
{"title":"Staff experiences of percutaneous tracheostomy in intensive care: challenges, complications and potential solutions","authors":"M. Moran,&nbsp;A. Goryanyy,&nbsp;A. Haron,&nbsp;C. Jay,&nbsp;A. Weightman,&nbsp;B. McGrath,&nbsp;C. Shelton","doi":"10.1002/anr3.70039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Tracheostomies are performed in 10–13% of UK intensive care admissions. While the percutaneous technique is well established, accurate needle insertion can be difficult in patients with obesity or neck swelling. These challenges increase the risk of bleeding, airway loss and injury to neck structures. In anatomically complex cases, patients are referred for surgical tracheostomy, causing delays and additional healthcare costs. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted with 32 staff across three intensive care units. Participants included consultants, resident doctors, nurses, advanced practitioners and auxiliary staff. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Six themes were identified. Tracheostomy was seen as a skilled, high-risk procedure best learned through supervised practice. Teamwork, equipment and the environment were considered vital to safety. Staff reported varied approaches to planning and performing the procedure, alongside strategies to prevent and manage complications. Participants reflected on how a guidance device might improve accuracy, drawing on experiences of the benefits and challenges of introducing new technologies into complex clinical settings. This study provides insights into tracheostomy practices, safety strategies and the potential role of guidance devices. Our study also presents a comprehensive end-user co-development model for future medical device design.</p>","PeriodicalId":72186,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia reports","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12930101/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://associationofanaesthetists-publications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anr3.70039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tracheostomies are performed in 10–13% of UK intensive care admissions. While the percutaneous technique is well established, accurate needle insertion can be difficult in patients with obesity or neck swelling. These challenges increase the risk of bleeding, airway loss and injury to neck structures. In anatomically complex cases, patients are referred for surgical tracheostomy, causing delays and additional healthcare costs. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted with 32 staff across three intensive care units. Participants included consultants, resident doctors, nurses, advanced practitioners and auxiliary staff. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Six themes were identified. Tracheostomy was seen as a skilled, high-risk procedure best learned through supervised practice. Teamwork, equipment and the environment were considered vital to safety. Staff reported varied approaches to planning and performing the procedure, alongside strategies to prevent and manage complications. Participants reflected on how a guidance device might improve accuracy, drawing on experiences of the benefits and challenges of introducing new technologies into complex clinical settings. This study provides insights into tracheostomy practices, safety strategies and the potential role of guidance devices. Our study also presents a comprehensive end-user co-development model for future medical device design.

Abstract Image

重症监护室经皮气管切开术的经验:挑战、并发症和可能的解决办法。
气管切开术在英国重症监护住院患者中占10-13%。虽然经皮穿刺技术已经很成熟,但对于肥胖或颈部肿胀的患者,准确的针头插入可能很困难。这些挑战增加了出血、气道丧失和颈部结构损伤的风险。在解剖复杂的情况下,患者被转介进行气管切开术,造成延误和额外的医疗费用。对三个重症监护室的32名工作人员进行了半结构化访谈和焦点小组。参加者包括会诊医生、住院医生、护士、高级执业医师及辅助人员。访谈记录,转录和分析使用归纳主题分析。确定了六个主题。气管切开术被认为是一个熟练的,高风险的程序,最好通过监督实践学习。团队合作、设备和环境被认为对安全至关重要。工作人员报告了规划和执行手术的各种方法,以及预防和管理并发症的策略。与会者借鉴了在复杂的临床环境中引入新技术的好处和挑战的经验,思考了引导装置如何提高准确性。这项研究为气管切开术的实践、安全策略和引导装置的潜在作用提供了见解。我们的研究也提出了一个全面的终端用户共同开发模型,用于未来的医疗器械设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书