Divergence in Perceptions of Shared Decision Making in Pediatric Neuromuscular Scoliosis.

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
MDM Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2026-02-23 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23814683261422234
Jody L Lin, Angela Zhu, Marla L Clayman, Kimberly A Kaphingst, Kaleb G Eppich, Greg Stoddard, Lindsay Andras, Unni G Narayanan, Heather T Keenan, Tamara D Simon, Steven M Asch, Angela Fagerlin
{"title":"Divergence in Perceptions of Shared Decision Making in Pediatric Neuromuscular Scoliosis.","authors":"Jody L Lin, Angela Zhu, Marla L Clayman, Kimberly A Kaphingst, Kaleb G Eppich, Greg Stoddard, Lindsay Andras, Unni G Narayanan, Heather T Keenan, Tamara D Simon, Steven M Asch, Angela Fagerlin","doi":"10.1177/23814683261422234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background.</b> Shared decision making (SDM) is a promising but poorly understood approach toward improving care for children with medical complexity. The objective of this study is to assess the quality of SDM using self-reported and observer-based measures in pediatric orthopedic clinic visits for neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS) surgical treatment decisions. <b>Methods.</b> We recruited 18 children with NMS at ≥8 y old, a Cobb angle of ≥50°, and no prior spine surgery at a quaternary children's hospital; their caregivers; and spine surgeons (<i>n</i> = 3). We video-recorded visits and administered postencounter surveys to assess SDM quality via the DEEP-SDM coding scheme and SDM-Q-9 (parent) and SDM-Q-Doc (provider) validated survey measures (0 = <i>poor-quality</i> to 100 = <i>high-quality SDM</i>). DEEP-SDM consists of 11 binary variables measuring whether a behavior occurred. We used convergent mixed methods to triangulate DEEP-SDM with survey outcomes and calculated caregiver-provider interrater reliability via prevalence-adjusted and bias-adjusted kappa for survey outcomes. <b>Results.</b> Only 1 child-caregiver-provider triad met all DEEP-SDM criteria (Cohen's kappa = 0.78). All visits discussed treatment rationale, provider preferences, and caregiver understanding. Few visits assessed patient self-efficacy (4/18) and defined treatment options (8/18). Providers led most conversations except for those around caregiver preferences/values and caregiver understanding. Median (interquartile range) SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc scores were 75.6 (66.7-91.6) and 80 (72.6-81.7), respectively. However, interrater reliability was poor for many items, including clarifying a need for decision making and eliciting caregiver preferences for decision involvement, both with kappa = 0 (confidence interval 0-0.35). <b>Conclusions.</b> In NMS treatment decisions, providers could more actively elicit parent preferences/values and self-efficacy. The poor caregiver-provider interrater reliability of SDM measures suggests current levels of SDM may be insufficient.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Both observer- and self-rated measures overestimate and inadequately capture the quality of shared decision making for children with medical complexity.Better provider-driven elicitation of family preferences and values is needed.Assessment of decisional self-efficacy is often missed.</p>","PeriodicalId":36567,"journal":{"name":"MDM Policy and Practice","volume":"11 1","pages":"23814683261422234"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12929890/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MDM Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683261422234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Shared decision making (SDM) is a promising but poorly understood approach toward improving care for children with medical complexity. The objective of this study is to assess the quality of SDM using self-reported and observer-based measures in pediatric orthopedic clinic visits for neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS) surgical treatment decisions. Methods. We recruited 18 children with NMS at ≥8 y old, a Cobb angle of ≥50°, and no prior spine surgery at a quaternary children's hospital; their caregivers; and spine surgeons (n = 3). We video-recorded visits and administered postencounter surveys to assess SDM quality via the DEEP-SDM coding scheme and SDM-Q-9 (parent) and SDM-Q-Doc (provider) validated survey measures (0 = poor-quality to 100 = high-quality SDM). DEEP-SDM consists of 11 binary variables measuring whether a behavior occurred. We used convergent mixed methods to triangulate DEEP-SDM with survey outcomes and calculated caregiver-provider interrater reliability via prevalence-adjusted and bias-adjusted kappa for survey outcomes. Results. Only 1 child-caregiver-provider triad met all DEEP-SDM criteria (Cohen's kappa = 0.78). All visits discussed treatment rationale, provider preferences, and caregiver understanding. Few visits assessed patient self-efficacy (4/18) and defined treatment options (8/18). Providers led most conversations except for those around caregiver preferences/values and caregiver understanding. Median (interquartile range) SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc scores were 75.6 (66.7-91.6) and 80 (72.6-81.7), respectively. However, interrater reliability was poor for many items, including clarifying a need for decision making and eliciting caregiver preferences for decision involvement, both with kappa = 0 (confidence interval 0-0.35). Conclusions. In NMS treatment decisions, providers could more actively elicit parent preferences/values and self-efficacy. The poor caregiver-provider interrater reliability of SDM measures suggests current levels of SDM may be insufficient.

Highlights: Both observer- and self-rated measures overestimate and inadequately capture the quality of shared decision making for children with medical complexity.Better provider-driven elicitation of family preferences and values is needed.Assessment of decisional self-efficacy is often missed.

小儿神经肌肉性脊柱侧凸共同决策的认知差异。
背景。共同决策(SDM)是一种很有前途但却鲜为人知的改善医疗复杂性儿童护理的方法。本研究的目的是评估SDM的质量,采用自我报告和基于观察员的措施,在小儿骨科门诊就诊的神经肌肉性脊柱侧凸(NMS)手术治疗决策。方法。我们招募了18名年龄≥8岁、Cobb角≥50°、在第四儿童医院无脊柱手术史的NMS患儿;他们的照顾者;脊柱外科医生(n = 3)。通过DEEP-SDM编码方案和SDM- q -9(家长)和SDM- q - doc(提供者)验证的调查措施(0 =低质量SDM至100 =高质量SDM),我们对访问进行了视频记录,并进行了事后调查,以评估SDM质量。DEEP-SDM由11个衡量行为是否发生的二进制变量组成。我们使用收敛混合方法对DEEP-SDM与调查结果进行三角测量,并通过调查结果的患病率调整和偏差调整kappa计算护理者-提供者间的信度。结果。只有1个儿童照顾者-提供者三合一符合所有DEEP-SDM标准(Cohen’s kappa = 0.78)。所有的访问都讨论了治疗的基本原理、提供者的偏好和照顾者的理解。很少有访问评估患者的自我效能(4/18)和确定治疗方案(8/18)。除了关于照顾者的偏好/价值观和照顾者的理解之外,大多数谈话都是由提供者主导的。SDM-Q-9和SDM-Q-Doc评分中位数(四分位间距)分别为75.6(66.7-91.6)和80(72.6-81.7)。然而,在许多项目上,解释者的信度很差,包括澄清决策的需要和引起照顾者对决策参与的偏好,两者的kappa = 0(置信区间0-0.35)。结论。在NMS治疗决策中,提供者可以更积极地引出家长的偏好/价值观和自我效能感。护理者-提供者之间的SDM措施的可靠性较差,表明目前的SDM水平可能是不够的。重点:观察者和自评措施都高估和不充分地捕捉到患有医疗复杂性的儿童共同决策的质量。需要更好地以提供者为导向,了解家庭偏好和价值观。决策自我效能的评估常常被忽略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MDM Policy and Practice
MDM Policy and Practice Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书