Improving Diagnosis: Evaluation of Diagnostic Experiences Classified as Problems, Mistakes, or Both by Patients and Care Partners From a Nationally Representative Survey.

IF 1.9 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Medical Care Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-26 DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000002302
Kelly T Gleason, Kathryn M McDonald, Rachel Grob, Christina T Yuan, Isha Dhingra, Emily Warne, Mark Schlesinger
{"title":"Improving Diagnosis: Evaluation of Diagnostic Experiences Classified as Problems, Mistakes, or Both by Patients and Care Partners From a Nationally Representative Survey.","authors":"Kelly T Gleason, Kathryn M McDonald, Rachel Grob, Christina T Yuan, Isha Dhingra, Emily Warne, Mark Schlesinger","doi":"10.1097/MLR.0000000000002302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding patients' experiences with diagnosis is crucial for improving care. Clarifying how best to ask about these experiences is an essential step in doing so.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To elicit and then categorize diagnostic problems and mistakes in a national, population-based survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Drawing from a nationally representative panel, respondents were asked whether they had experienced (directly or as a care partner) a diagnostic problem or mistake in the last 4 years. They then classified the experience as a mistake, a problem only, or a combination of both. Respondents who experienced multiple problems and mistakes reported on their most memorable experience. We compared responses among those reporting a problem, a mistake, or a combination of both.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A third [1216/3684 (33.0%)] of screened households reported diagnostic problems or mistakes involving themselves [697/3684 (18.9%)] or someone close to them [519/3684 (14.1%)]. A plurality [448/3684 (12.2%)] categorized these as a mistake, 382 (10.4%) as a problem, and 371 (10.1%) as both. Experiences reported as problems versus mistakes were equally likely to be associated with harmful consequences and concrete clinician responses. The distribution of problems and mistakes across the 3 categories did not significantly differ when reported by patients versus care partners, though there were checkered differences in the reported impact.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Whether labeled as problems or mistakes, diagnostic experiences reported by patients and care partners are accompanied by substantial emotional, physical, and financial impacts. Responding to this full range of patient experiences is important for guiding improvements in diagnostic quality within learning health systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":18364,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care","volume":" ","pages":"335-343"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13014693/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002302","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Understanding patients' experiences with diagnosis is crucial for improving care. Clarifying how best to ask about these experiences is an essential step in doing so.

Objective: To elicit and then categorize diagnostic problems and mistakes in a national, population-based survey.

Methods: Drawing from a nationally representative panel, respondents were asked whether they had experienced (directly or as a care partner) a diagnostic problem or mistake in the last 4 years. They then classified the experience as a mistake, a problem only, or a combination of both. Respondents who experienced multiple problems and mistakes reported on their most memorable experience. We compared responses among those reporting a problem, a mistake, or a combination of both.

Results: A third [1216/3684 (33.0%)] of screened households reported diagnostic problems or mistakes involving themselves [697/3684 (18.9%)] or someone close to them [519/3684 (14.1%)]. A plurality [448/3684 (12.2%)] categorized these as a mistake, 382 (10.4%) as a problem, and 371 (10.1%) as both. Experiences reported as problems versus mistakes were equally likely to be associated with harmful consequences and concrete clinician responses. The distribution of problems and mistakes across the 3 categories did not significantly differ when reported by patients versus care partners, though there were checkered differences in the reported impact.

Conclusions: Whether labeled as problems or mistakes, diagnostic experiences reported by patients and care partners are accompanied by substantial emotional, physical, and financial impacts. Responding to this full range of patient experiences is important for guiding improvements in diagnostic quality within learning health systems.

改进诊断:评估诊断经验分类为问题,错误,或由患者和护理伙伴从全国代表性调查。
背景:了解患者的诊断经验对改善护理至关重要。明确如何最好地询问这些经历是这样做的必要步骤。目的:引出并分类全国人口调查中的诊断问题和错误。方法:从全国代表性小组中抽取,受访者被问及他们是否在过去4年里(直接或作为护理伙伴)经历过诊断问题或错误。然后,他们将这种经历归类为错误、问题或两者兼而有之。经历过多次问题和错误的受访者报告了他们最难忘的经历。我们比较了那些报告问题、错误或两者兼而有之的人的反应。结果:三分之一[1216/3684(33.0%)]的筛查家庭报告诊断问题或错误涉及自己[697/3684(18.9%)]或与其亲近的人[519/3684(14.1%)]。多数人[448/3684(12.2%)]认为这是一个错误,382(10.4%)认为是一个问题,371(10.1%)认为两者都是。作为问题和错误报告的经验同样可能与有害后果和具体的临床医生反应有关。当患者和护理伙伴报告时,问题和错误的分布在3个类别中没有显着差异,尽管报告的影响存在差异。结论:无论是被标记为问题还是错误,患者和护理伙伴报告的诊断经历都伴随着实质性的情感、身体和经济影响。应对这一全方位的患者经验对于指导改进学习型卫生系统的诊断质量非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Care
Medical Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
228
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rated as one of the top ten journals in healthcare administration, Medical Care is devoted to all aspects of the administration and delivery of healthcare. This scholarly journal publishes original, peer-reviewed papers documenting the most current developments in the rapidly changing field of healthcare. This timely journal reports on the findings of original investigations into issues related to the research, planning, organization, financing, provision, and evaluation of health services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书