{"title":"Beyond the laboratory: how COVID-19 reshaped specimen collection, testing workflows, and diagnostic algorithms.","authors":"Alexander Domnich, Elena Pariani","doi":"10.1080/14737159.2026.2638743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic forced a radical expansion of essential public health laboratory services that went beyond basic testing. This perspective highlights key shifts in laboratory function, specifically toward decentralized testing, self-sampling, less invasive specimen types, point-of-care devices, and novel surveillance strategies.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The surge in testing demand favored decentralized solutions, including rapid lateral flow tests, due to their flexibility, speed, and affordability. However, several challenges arose from the variable diagnostic accuracy of rapid self-tests and alternative specimen types when compared to reference laboratory-based molecular assays using nasopharyngeal swabs. For instance, the use of self-collected saliva, which is often preferred by patients, was hindered by a lack of internationally standardized processing protocols. A post-pandemic rebound in the circulation of respiratory pathogens other than SARS-CoV-2 was likely driven by both immunity debt and increased testing, including of less severe cases, commonly performed through more costly multiplex respiratory panels.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Moving forward, while over-the-counter self-tests for common respiratory viruses are now common, stricter regulatory oversight and improved data connectivity are essential. Local decision-makers must weigh the trade-offs between broad testing access and clinical performance, and implement robust diagnostic stewardship programs for acute respiratory infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":12113,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","volume":" ","pages":"127-139"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737159.2026.2638743","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic forced a radical expansion of essential public health laboratory services that went beyond basic testing. This perspective highlights key shifts in laboratory function, specifically toward decentralized testing, self-sampling, less invasive specimen types, point-of-care devices, and novel surveillance strategies.
Areas covered: The surge in testing demand favored decentralized solutions, including rapid lateral flow tests, due to their flexibility, speed, and affordability. However, several challenges arose from the variable diagnostic accuracy of rapid self-tests and alternative specimen types when compared to reference laboratory-based molecular assays using nasopharyngeal swabs. For instance, the use of self-collected saliva, which is often preferred by patients, was hindered by a lack of internationally standardized processing protocols. A post-pandemic rebound in the circulation of respiratory pathogens other than SARS-CoV-2 was likely driven by both immunity debt and increased testing, including of less severe cases, commonly performed through more costly multiplex respiratory panels.
Expert opinion: Moving forward, while over-the-counter self-tests for common respiratory viruses are now common, stricter regulatory oversight and improved data connectivity are essential. Local decision-makers must weigh the trade-offs between broad testing access and clinical performance, and implement robust diagnostic stewardship programs for acute respiratory infections.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics (ISSN 1473-7159) publishes expert reviews of the latest advancements in the field of molecular diagnostics including the detection and monitoring of the molecular causes of disease that are being translated into groundbreaking diagnostic and prognostic technologies to be used in the clinical diagnostic setting.
Each issue of Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics contains leading reviews on current and emerging topics relating to molecular diagnostics, subject to a rigorous peer review process; editorials discussing contentious issues in the field; diagnostic profiles featuring independent, expert evaluations of diagnostic tests; meeting reports of recent molecular diagnostics conferences and key paper evaluations featuring assessments of significant, recently published articles from specialists in molecular diagnostic therapy.
Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics provides the forum for reporting the critical advances being made in this ever-expanding field, as well as the major challenges ahead in their clinical implementation. The journal delivers this information in concise, at-a-glance article formats: invaluable to a time-constrained community.