Beyond the laboratory: how COVID-19 reshaped specimen collection, testing workflows, and diagnostic algorithms.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Alexander Domnich, Elena Pariani
{"title":"Beyond the laboratory: how COVID-19 reshaped specimen collection, testing workflows, and diagnostic algorithms.","authors":"Alexander Domnich, Elena Pariani","doi":"10.1080/14737159.2026.2638743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic forced a radical expansion of essential public health laboratory services that went beyond basic testing. This perspective highlights key shifts in laboratory function, specifically toward decentralized testing, self-sampling, less invasive specimen types, point-of-care devices, and novel surveillance strategies.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The surge in testing demand favored decentralized solutions, including rapid lateral flow tests, due to their flexibility, speed, and affordability. However, several challenges arose from the variable diagnostic accuracy of rapid self-tests and alternative specimen types when compared to reference laboratory-based molecular assays using nasopharyngeal swabs. For instance, the use of self-collected saliva, which is often preferred by patients, was hindered by a lack of internationally standardized processing protocols. A post-pandemic rebound in the circulation of respiratory pathogens other than SARS-CoV-2 was likely driven by both immunity debt and increased testing, including of less severe cases, commonly performed through more costly multiplex respiratory panels.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Moving forward, while over-the-counter self-tests for common respiratory viruses are now common, stricter regulatory oversight and improved data connectivity are essential. Local decision-makers must weigh the trade-offs between broad testing access and clinical performance, and implement robust diagnostic stewardship programs for acute respiratory infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":12113,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","volume":" ","pages":"127-139"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737159.2026.2638743","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic forced a radical expansion of essential public health laboratory services that went beyond basic testing. This perspective highlights key shifts in laboratory function, specifically toward decentralized testing, self-sampling, less invasive specimen types, point-of-care devices, and novel surveillance strategies.

Areas covered: The surge in testing demand favored decentralized solutions, including rapid lateral flow tests, due to their flexibility, speed, and affordability. However, several challenges arose from the variable diagnostic accuracy of rapid self-tests and alternative specimen types when compared to reference laboratory-based molecular assays using nasopharyngeal swabs. For instance, the use of self-collected saliva, which is often preferred by patients, was hindered by a lack of internationally standardized processing protocols. A post-pandemic rebound in the circulation of respiratory pathogens other than SARS-CoV-2 was likely driven by both immunity debt and increased testing, including of less severe cases, commonly performed through more costly multiplex respiratory panels.

Expert opinion: Moving forward, while over-the-counter self-tests for common respiratory viruses are now common, stricter regulatory oversight and improved data connectivity are essential. Local decision-makers must weigh the trade-offs between broad testing access and clinical performance, and implement robust diagnostic stewardship programs for acute respiratory infections.

超越实验室:COVID-19如何重塑标本采集、测试工作流程和诊断算法。
SARS-CoV-2大流行迫使基本公共卫生实验室服务大幅扩大,超出了基本检测范围。这一观点强调了实验室功能的关键转变,特别是向分散检测、自我采样、侵入性较小的标本类型、即时护理设备和新型监测策略转变。涵盖的领域:测试需求的激增有利于分散的解决方案,包括快速横向流测试,因为它们的灵活性、速度和可负担性。然而,与使用鼻咽拭子的参考实验室分子分析相比,快速自我检测和替代标本类型的诊断准确性存在差异,这带来了一些挑战。例如,患者通常更喜欢使用自己收集的唾液,但由于缺乏国际标准化的处理方案而受到阻碍。除SARS-CoV-2以外的呼吸道病原体在大流行后的循环反弹可能是由免疫债务和增加检测(包括不太严重的病例)驱动的,这些检测通常通过更昂贵的多重呼吸面板进行。专家意见:展望未来,虽然针对常见呼吸道病毒的非处方自我检测现在很常见,但更严格的监管和改进的数据连接至关重要。地方决策者必须权衡广泛的检测获取和临床表现之间的权衡,并实施强有力的急性呼吸道感染诊断管理计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics (ISSN 1473-7159) publishes expert reviews of the latest advancements in the field of molecular diagnostics including the detection and monitoring of the molecular causes of disease that are being translated into groundbreaking diagnostic and prognostic technologies to be used in the clinical diagnostic setting. Each issue of Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics contains leading reviews on current and emerging topics relating to molecular diagnostics, subject to a rigorous peer review process; editorials discussing contentious issues in the field; diagnostic profiles featuring independent, expert evaluations of diagnostic tests; meeting reports of recent molecular diagnostics conferences and key paper evaluations featuring assessments of significant, recently published articles from specialists in molecular diagnostic therapy. Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics provides the forum for reporting the critical advances being made in this ever-expanding field, as well as the major challenges ahead in their clinical implementation. The journal delivers this information in concise, at-a-glance article formats: invaluable to a time-constrained community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书