Ernesto Anarte-Lazo, Ana Bravo-Vazquez, Carlos Bernal-Utrera, Daniel Torres-Lagares, Cleofas Rodriguez-Blanco, Deborah Falla
{"title":"Rehabilitation interventions for the management of treatment-induced trismus in people with head and neck cancer: A scoping review.","authors":"Ernesto Anarte-Lazo, Ana Bravo-Vazquez, Carlos Bernal-Utrera, Daniel Torres-Lagares, Cleofas Rodriguez-Blanco, Deborah Falla","doi":"10.1177/02692155261426637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTrismus is a common and debilitating complication following head and neck cancer treatment, with significant consequences for quality of life, nutrition and oral function. Although several rehabilitation strategies have been proposed, their design and effectiveness remain poorly systematized. This review aimed to summarize evidence from randomized controlled trials on rehabilitation interventions for treatment-induced trismus in HNC.Data sourcesA scoping review was performed using PubMed, PEDro, Web of Science, Scopus and EMBASE, covering publications up to May 2025.Review methodsWe included randomized controlled trials in English or Spanish evaluating any rehabilitation intervention in adults with trismus following HNC treatment. One author conducted the search, and two authors independently screened articles for inclusion.ResultsFrom 2215 records identified, 25 randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Twelve investigated preventions during or shortly after cancer treatment, while 13 addressed established trismus. Most interventions were based on exercise therapy, delivered in hospitals, private clinics or at home. Only a minority incorporated manual therapy or physical agents. Devices such as TheraBite or JawTrainer were evaluated in several studies. While most trials reported improvements in maximal mouth opening, few assessed condition-specific patient-reported outcomes. Rehabilitation interventions were predominantly implemented by physiotherapists.ConclusionExercise therapy, often combined with devices, is the most frequently studied approach for treatment-induced trismus. Evidence for manual therapy and physical modalities remains limited. Considerable heterogeneity across studies hinders comparison and replication, underlining the need for standardized protocols and outcomes in future trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1160-1176"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155261426637","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ObjectiveTrismus is a common and debilitating complication following head and neck cancer treatment, with significant consequences for quality of life, nutrition and oral function. Although several rehabilitation strategies have been proposed, their design and effectiveness remain poorly systematized. This review aimed to summarize evidence from randomized controlled trials on rehabilitation interventions for treatment-induced trismus in HNC.Data sourcesA scoping review was performed using PubMed, PEDro, Web of Science, Scopus and EMBASE, covering publications up to May 2025.Review methodsWe included randomized controlled trials in English or Spanish evaluating any rehabilitation intervention in adults with trismus following HNC treatment. One author conducted the search, and two authors independently screened articles for inclusion.ResultsFrom 2215 records identified, 25 randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Twelve investigated preventions during or shortly after cancer treatment, while 13 addressed established trismus. Most interventions were based on exercise therapy, delivered in hospitals, private clinics or at home. Only a minority incorporated manual therapy or physical agents. Devices such as TheraBite or JawTrainer were evaluated in several studies. While most trials reported improvements in maximal mouth opening, few assessed condition-specific patient-reported outcomes. Rehabilitation interventions were predominantly implemented by physiotherapists.ConclusionExercise therapy, often combined with devices, is the most frequently studied approach for treatment-induced trismus. Evidence for manual therapy and physical modalities remains limited. Considerable heterogeneity across studies hinders comparison and replication, underlining the need for standardized protocols and outcomes in future trials.
目的:牙关是头颈癌治疗后常见的并发症,严重影响患者的生活质量、营养和口腔功能。虽然提出了几种康复策略,但其设计和有效性仍然缺乏系统化。本综述旨在总结来自HNC治疗性牙关的康复干预的随机对照试验的证据。数据来源使用PubMed、PEDro、Web of Science、Scopus和EMBASE进行范围审查,涵盖截至2025年5月的出版物。回顾方法:我们纳入了英语或西班牙语的随机对照试验,以评估HNC治疗后成人牙关患者的康复干预。一名作者进行了搜索,两名作者独立筛选文章。结果在2215份文献中,25项随机对照试验符合纳入标准。12项研究调查了癌症治疗期间或治疗后不久的预防措施,13项研究针对已形成的牙关。大多数干预措施都是基于运动疗法,在医院、私人诊所或家中进行。只有少数人采用手工疗法或物理疗法。诸如TheraBite或JawTrainer等设备在几项研究中进行了评估。虽然大多数试验报告了最大开口的改善,但很少评估特定条件的患者报告的结果。康复干预主要由物理治疗师实施。结论运动疗法常与器械相结合,是治疗性牙关最常用的方法。手工疗法和物理疗法的证据仍然有限。研究间相当大的异质性阻碍了比较和复制,强调了在未来的试验中需要标准化的方案和结果。
期刊介绍:
Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)