Cost Effectiveness of Osimertinib with Chemotherapy Compared to Osimertinib Monotherapy and First-Generation EGFR-TKIs in Advanced NSCLC in the USA.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Clinical Drug Investigation Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-26 DOI:10.1007/s40261-026-01535-1
Mohammad Alnuman, Kangho Suh
{"title":"Cost Effectiveness of Osimertinib with Chemotherapy Compared to Osimertinib Monotherapy and First-Generation EGFR-TKIs in Advanced NSCLC in the USA.","authors":"Mohammad Alnuman, Kangho Suh","doi":"10.1007/s40261-026-01535-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>In clinical trials, osimertinib combined with chemotherapy has demonstrated improved efficacy in patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer. However, the projected long-term outcomes and the associated cost effectiveness compared to osimertinib monotherapy and first-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors remain uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A lifetime partitioned survival model was developed from the US healthcare sector perspective using clinical trial data from pivotal trials FLAURA and FLAURA2. Model inputs included drug costs, administration costs, and health utilities sourced from the published literature. Dynamic drug pricing and a 3% discount rate were incorporated. Outcomes included life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), total costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Combination therapy yielded 2.96 QALYs at a cost of $692,796. The resultant incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $265,601/QALY versus osimertinib monotherapy and $467,747/QALY versus first-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Findings were consistent across sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While clinically effective, based on commonly accepted cost-effectiveness thresholds in the USA, our study suggests that osimertinib plus chemotherapy was not cost effective compared to osimertinib alone or first-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors.</p>","PeriodicalId":10402,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Drug Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"541-549"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Drug Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-026-01535-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: In clinical trials, osimertinib combined with chemotherapy has demonstrated improved efficacy in patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer. However, the projected long-term outcomes and the associated cost effectiveness compared to osimertinib monotherapy and first-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors remain uncertain.

Methods: A lifetime partitioned survival model was developed from the US healthcare sector perspective using clinical trial data from pivotal trials FLAURA and FLAURA2. Model inputs included drug costs, administration costs, and health utilities sourced from the published literature. Dynamic drug pricing and a 3% discount rate were incorporated. Outcomes included life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), total costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.

Results: Combination therapy yielded 2.96 QALYs at a cost of $692,796. The resultant incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $265,601/QALY versus osimertinib monotherapy and $467,747/QALY versus first-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Findings were consistent across sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions: While clinically effective, based on commonly accepted cost-effectiveness thresholds in the USA, our study suggests that osimertinib plus chemotherapy was not cost effective compared to osimertinib alone or first-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

在美国晚期NSCLC中,与奥西替尼单药和第一代EGFR-TKIs相比,奥西替尼联合化疗的成本效益
背景与目的:在临床试验中,奥西替尼联合化疗对晚期表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变的非小细胞肺癌患者的疗效有所提高。然而,与奥西替尼单药治疗和第一代egfr -酪氨酸激酶抑制剂相比,预计的长期结果和相关的成本效益仍然不确定。方法:利用关键试验FLAURA和FLAURA2的临床试验数据,从美国医疗保健部门的角度建立终身分区生存模型。模型输入包括来自已发表文献的药品成本、管理成本和卫生设施。纳入了药品动态定价和3%的折扣率。结果包括生命年、质量调整生命年(QALYs)、总成本和增量成本-效果比。进行了单向和概率敏感性分析。结果:联合治疗获得2.96个qaly,成本为692,796美元。由此产生的增量成本-效果比为:与奥西替尼单药相比,QALY为265,601美元/QALY,与第一代egfr -酪氨酸激酶抑制剂相比,QALY为467,747美元/QALY。敏感性分析的结果是一致的。结论:虽然临床有效,但根据美国普遍接受的成本效益阈值,我们的研究表明,与单独使用奥西替尼或第一代egfr -酪氨酸激酶抑制剂相比,奥西替尼加化疗并不具有成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
108
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Drug Investigation provides rapid publication of original research covering all phases of clinical drug development and therapeutic use of drugs. The Journal includes: -Clinical trials, outcomes research, clinical pharmacoeconomic studies and pharmacoepidemiology studies with a strong link to optimum prescribing practice for a drug or group of drugs. -Clinical pharmacodynamic and clinical pharmacokinetic studies with a strong link to clinical practice. -Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies in healthy volunteers in which significant implications for clinical prescribing are discussed. -Studies focusing on the application of drug delivery technology in healthcare. -Short communications and case study reports that meet the above criteria will also be considered. Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in Clinical Drug Investigation may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge, but non in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书