Evaluation of pesticide reduction strategies in cropping systems. A review

IF 8.2 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Han Zhang, David Makowski
{"title":"Evaluation of pesticide reduction strategies in cropping systems. A review","authors":"Han Zhang,&nbsp;David Makowski","doi":"10.1007/s13593-026-01086-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The unsustainable and excessive use of pesticides in agriculture causes multi-faceted environmental and human health problems worldwide. Numerous strategies have been proposed to reduce pesticide use; however, the knowledge regarding their performance is scattered. To move forward, it is crucial to evaluate pesticide reduction strategies and identify the most efficient ones. The objective of this work is to globally synthesize published literature on pesticide reduction strategies in order to describe their main characteristics and assess their performances across a wide range of indicators. Based on a systematic review of ten papers from the secondary literature involving generalized linear mixed-effect models and text mining techniques, we reviewed 97 primary research papers reporting 135 studies assessing pesticide reduction strategies. Sixteen types of individual strategy were identified, among which the most investigated strategies were site-specific pesticide application, physical/mechanical control, and advanced machinery. Herbicide was the most studied pesticide group regarding pesticide reduction. The most frequent method used to assess pesticide reduction strategies was field experiment (83%). Fifty-one indicators reflecting the impacts of pesticide reduction strategies were grouped into four categories: economic output, pest control efficacy, pesticide related input, and side effects. Pesticide reduction strategies had a higher likelihood to reduce pesticide input and side effects than to improve economic output and pest control efficacy. The primary literature was then allocated to two main topics: topic 1 includes weed management in cereals, and topic 2 concerns insect and disease management in fruits. Studies focusing on topic 2 and studies combining several pesticide reduction strategies had higher probabilities to report positive effects from pesticide reduction strategies than topic 1 and single strategies, respectively. We also found that organic systems produce more positive results than low-input systems, especially regarding side effects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7721,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","volume":"46 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-026-01086-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The unsustainable and excessive use of pesticides in agriculture causes multi-faceted environmental and human health problems worldwide. Numerous strategies have been proposed to reduce pesticide use; however, the knowledge regarding their performance is scattered. To move forward, it is crucial to evaluate pesticide reduction strategies and identify the most efficient ones. The objective of this work is to globally synthesize published literature on pesticide reduction strategies in order to describe their main characteristics and assess their performances across a wide range of indicators. Based on a systematic review of ten papers from the secondary literature involving generalized linear mixed-effect models and text mining techniques, we reviewed 97 primary research papers reporting 135 studies assessing pesticide reduction strategies. Sixteen types of individual strategy were identified, among which the most investigated strategies were site-specific pesticide application, physical/mechanical control, and advanced machinery. Herbicide was the most studied pesticide group regarding pesticide reduction. The most frequent method used to assess pesticide reduction strategies was field experiment (83%). Fifty-one indicators reflecting the impacts of pesticide reduction strategies were grouped into four categories: economic output, pest control efficacy, pesticide related input, and side effects. Pesticide reduction strategies had a higher likelihood to reduce pesticide input and side effects than to improve economic output and pest control efficacy. The primary literature was then allocated to two main topics: topic 1 includes weed management in cereals, and topic 2 concerns insect and disease management in fruits. Studies focusing on topic 2 and studies combining several pesticide reduction strategies had higher probabilities to report positive effects from pesticide reduction strategies than topic 1 and single strategies, respectively. We also found that organic systems produce more positive results than low-input systems, especially regarding side effects.

Abstract Image

作物系统农药减量策略评价。回顾
农业中不可持续和过度使用农药在世界范围内造成多方面的环境和人类健康问题。已经提出了许多减少农药使用的策略;然而,关于他们的表现的知识是分散的。为了向前推进,至关重要的是评估农药减少策略并确定最有效的策略。这项工作的目的是在全球范围内综合有关农药减少战略的已发表文献,以描述其主要特征并通过广泛的指标评估其表现。在系统回顾了10篇涉及广义线性混合效应模型和文本挖掘技术的二手文献的基础上,我们回顾了97篇主要研究论文,报告了135项评估农药减少策略的研究。共鉴定出16种个体策略,其中研究最多的策略是定点施药、物理/机械控制和先进机械。在农药减量方面,除草剂是研究最多的一类农药。评估农药减量策略最常用的方法是田间试验(83%)。51项指标反映了农药减少战略的影响,分为四类:经济产出、虫害防治效果、农药相关投入和副作用。农药减量策略更有可能减少农药投入和副作用,而不是提高经济产出和害虫防治效果。原始文献随后被分配到两个主要主题:主题1包括谷物杂草管理,主题2涉及水果昆虫和疾病管理。关注主题2的研究和结合几种农药减少策略的研究分别比主题1和单一策略报告农药减少策略的积极影响的概率更高。我们还发现,有机系统比低投入系统产生更积极的结果,特别是在副作用方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy for Sustainable Development
Agronomy for Sustainable Development 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.20%
发文量
108
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Agronomy for Sustainable Development (ASD) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal of international scope, dedicated to publishing original research articles, review articles, and meta-analyses aimed at improving sustainability in agricultural and food systems. The journal serves as a bridge between agronomy, cropping, and farming system research and various other disciplines including ecology, genetics, economics, and social sciences. ASD encourages studies in agroecology, participatory research, and interdisciplinary approaches, with a focus on systems thinking applied at different scales from field to global levels. Research articles published in ASD should present significant scientific advancements compared to existing knowledge, within an international context. Review articles should critically evaluate emerging topics, and opinion papers may also be submitted as reviews. Meta-analysis articles should provide clear contributions to resolving widely debated scientific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书