Systematic scoping review on HIV services for males in Sub-Saharan Africa: Access, barriers, and research gaps.

IF 1.1
Patience Manjengwa, Clarence Yah, Nozipho Musakwa, Alfred Musekiwa
{"title":"Systematic scoping review on HIV services for males in Sub-Saharan Africa: Access, barriers, and research gaps.","authors":"Patience Manjengwa, Clarence Yah, Nozipho Musakwa, Alfred Musekiwa","doi":"10.2989/16085906.2025.2600049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Access to HIV services among men and boys in Sub-Saharan Africa is a significant public health challenge, exacerbated by cultural norms surrounding masculinity. This scoping review systematically investigates disparities in the provision and utilisation of these services in Sub-Saharan Africa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review followed the Arksey and O'Malley framework, employing a five-step process with any disputes resolved through discussion. A comprehensive search across various databases was conducted for studies published from January 2010 to October 2023. Methodological quality was assessed using PRISMA-ScR and the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool, while NVivo supported thematic content analysis. EndNote and Rayyan software facilitated reference management and study screening.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 1 489 studies retrieved, 30 met the inclusion criteria, primarily qualitative (70%) and quantitative (16.7%). Most studies originated from South Africa (<i>n</i> = 10) and Uganda (<i>n</i> = 5). HIV testing services accounted for 36.7% of the studies, followed by treatment services (26.7%) and prevention services (20%). Facilitators of access included community health services and male catch-up plans. Barriers to accessing HIV services included stigma, masculinity norms, and fear of HIV-positive results, with low-risk perception also frequently noted. Male engagement strategies emerged as key to improving service delivery and utilisation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings revealed a moderate body of literature on HIV services for men in Sub-Saharan Africa, with research concentrated in South Africa and Uganda. Stigma, masculinity norms, and fear of HIV-positive results remain significant barriers, while community health services and male catch-up plans facilitate access. Implementing male engagement strategies and addressing these barriers is essential for improving service delivery, informing policy, and prioritising future research in underrepresented regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":520548,"journal":{"name":"African journal of AIDS research : AJAR","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African journal of AIDS research : AJAR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2989/16085906.2025.2600049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Access to HIV services among men and boys in Sub-Saharan Africa is a significant public health challenge, exacerbated by cultural norms surrounding masculinity. This scoping review systematically investigates disparities in the provision and utilisation of these services in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Methods: The review followed the Arksey and O'Malley framework, employing a five-step process with any disputes resolved through discussion. A comprehensive search across various databases was conducted for studies published from January 2010 to October 2023. Methodological quality was assessed using PRISMA-ScR and the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool, while NVivo supported thematic content analysis. EndNote and Rayyan software facilitated reference management and study screening.

Results: Out of 1 489 studies retrieved, 30 met the inclusion criteria, primarily qualitative (70%) and quantitative (16.7%). Most studies originated from South Africa (n = 10) and Uganda (n = 5). HIV testing services accounted for 36.7% of the studies, followed by treatment services (26.7%) and prevention services (20%). Facilitators of access included community health services and male catch-up plans. Barriers to accessing HIV services included stigma, masculinity norms, and fear of HIV-positive results, with low-risk perception also frequently noted. Male engagement strategies emerged as key to improving service delivery and utilisation.

Conclusions: The findings revealed a moderate body of literature on HIV services for men in Sub-Saharan Africa, with research concentrated in South Africa and Uganda. Stigma, masculinity norms, and fear of HIV-positive results remain significant barriers, while community health services and male catch-up plans facilitate access. Implementing male engagement strategies and addressing these barriers is essential for improving service delivery, informing policy, and prioritising future research in underrepresented regions.

撒哈拉以南非洲男性艾滋病毒服务的系统范围审查:获取、障碍和研究差距。
背景:在撒哈拉以南非洲,男子和男孩获得艾滋病毒服务是一项重大的公共卫生挑战,而围绕男子气概的文化规范加剧了这一挑战。这项范围审查系统地调查了撒哈拉以南非洲在提供和利用这些服务方面的差异。方法:回顾遵循Arksey和O'Malley框架,采用五步流程,通过讨论解决任何争议。对2010年1月至2023年10月期间发表的研究进行了各种数据库的全面搜索。方法学质量评估使用PRISMA-ScR和混合方法评估工具,而NVivo支持专题内容分析。EndNote和Rayyan软件促进了文献管理和研究筛选。结果:在1 489篇文献中,有30篇符合纳入标准,主要是定性(70%)和定量(16.7%)。大多数研究来自南非(n = 10)和乌干达(n = 5)。艾滋病毒检测服务占研究的36.7%,其次是治疗服务(26.7%)和预防服务(20%)。促进获得服务的因素包括社区保健服务和男性赶超计划。获得艾滋病毒服务的障碍包括耻辱、男子气概规范和对艾滋病毒阳性结果的恐惧,此外还经常注意到低风险观念。男性参与战略成为改善服务提供和利用的关键。结论:研究结果揭示了撒哈拉以南非洲男性艾滋病服务的适度文献,研究集中在南非和乌干达。污名化、男子气概规范和对艾滋病毒阳性结果的恐惧仍然是重大障碍,而社区卫生服务和男性追赶计划则有助于获得这些服务。实施男性参与战略和解决这些障碍对于改善服务提供、为政策提供信息以及在代表性不足的地区优先考虑未来的研究至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书