{"title":"The Psoriatic Disease Assessment Index (PSODAI) Score to Evaluate Systemic Involvement of Psoriasis.","authors":"Yanhua Liang, Baoqing Deng, Epipode Ntawuyamara, Hervé Bachelez, Fuxi Wang, Hao Zhang, Zhenying Zhang, Zhengfeng Li, Lin Dang, Yajie Wang, Xianbiao Zou, Li Wang, Dejian Duan, Hongxiang Chen, Wenjun Zheng, Hui Huang, Min Zhang, Qingxian Cai, Ye Chen, Yingli Zhang, Zeyuan Lu, Yalin Ren, Jinxian Huang","doi":"10.2147/PTT.S548700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To the best of our knowledge, no validated scoring instrument currently exists that comprehensively evaluates both cutaneous manifestations and systemic comorbidities of psoriasis. This multicenter study aimed to develop and validate a novel multidimensional scoring system addressing this clinical gap.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Under the guidance of the Shenzhen Psoriasis Academy, we conducted seven expert meetings to analyze existing evidence from PubMed, Wanfang, and CNKI databases. Through iterative Delphi consensus processes involving 26 specialists across 10 disciplines, we established the Psoriasis Disease Assessment Index (PSODAI). This 60-point composite instrument evaluates cutaneous involvement and nine key organ/system comorbidities. An accompanying online calculator (http://www.psodai.com.cn/) was developed for clinical implementation. Validation involved 254 psoriasis patients from six tertiary centers, with comparative analyses against PASI and DLQI metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PSODAI framework stratifies disease severity as mild (0-20), moderate (21-40), and severe (41-60). Comparative analysis revealed comparable proportions of moderate-to-severe cases between PSODAI and conventional tools (PASI/DLQI) (p>0.05). Notably, 11 patients (4.3%) classified as severe by PASI were re-categorized as mild through PSODAI's systemic evaluation, primarily due to limited extracutaneous manifestations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As the first comorbidity-integrated assessment tool, PSODAI enables cross-specialty collaboration for holistic patient management. Its clinical adoption may facilitate timely comorbidity detection and preventive interventions. Further multicenter validation is warranted to confirm these preliminary findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":74589,"journal":{"name":"Psoriasis (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"16 ","pages":"548700"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12927750/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psoriasis (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PTT.S548700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: To the best of our knowledge, no validated scoring instrument currently exists that comprehensively evaluates both cutaneous manifestations and systemic comorbidities of psoriasis. This multicenter study aimed to develop and validate a novel multidimensional scoring system addressing this clinical gap.
Methods: Under the guidance of the Shenzhen Psoriasis Academy, we conducted seven expert meetings to analyze existing evidence from PubMed, Wanfang, and CNKI databases. Through iterative Delphi consensus processes involving 26 specialists across 10 disciplines, we established the Psoriasis Disease Assessment Index (PSODAI). This 60-point composite instrument evaluates cutaneous involvement and nine key organ/system comorbidities. An accompanying online calculator (http://www.psodai.com.cn/) was developed for clinical implementation. Validation involved 254 psoriasis patients from six tertiary centers, with comparative analyses against PASI and DLQI metrics.
Results: The PSODAI framework stratifies disease severity as mild (0-20), moderate (21-40), and severe (41-60). Comparative analysis revealed comparable proportions of moderate-to-severe cases between PSODAI and conventional tools (PASI/DLQI) (p>0.05). Notably, 11 patients (4.3%) classified as severe by PASI were re-categorized as mild through PSODAI's systemic evaluation, primarily due to limited extracutaneous manifestations.
Conclusion: As the first comorbidity-integrated assessment tool, PSODAI enables cross-specialty collaboration for holistic patient management. Its clinical adoption may facilitate timely comorbidity detection and preventive interventions. Further multicenter validation is warranted to confirm these preliminary findings.