The Psoriatic Disease Assessment Index (PSODAI) Score to Evaluate Systemic Involvement of Psoriasis.

IF 5.2 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Psoriasis (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2026-02-16 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PTT.S548700
Yanhua Liang, Baoqing Deng, Epipode Ntawuyamara, Hervé Bachelez, Fuxi Wang, Hao Zhang, Zhenying Zhang, Zhengfeng Li, Lin Dang, Yajie Wang, Xianbiao Zou, Li Wang, Dejian Duan, Hongxiang Chen, Wenjun Zheng, Hui Huang, Min Zhang, Qingxian Cai, Ye Chen, Yingli Zhang, Zeyuan Lu, Yalin Ren, Jinxian Huang
{"title":"The Psoriatic Disease Assessment Index (PSODAI) Score to Evaluate Systemic Involvement of Psoriasis.","authors":"Yanhua Liang, Baoqing Deng, Epipode Ntawuyamara, Hervé Bachelez, Fuxi Wang, Hao Zhang, Zhenying Zhang, Zhengfeng Li, Lin Dang, Yajie Wang, Xianbiao Zou, Li Wang, Dejian Duan, Hongxiang Chen, Wenjun Zheng, Hui Huang, Min Zhang, Qingxian Cai, Ye Chen, Yingli Zhang, Zeyuan Lu, Yalin Ren, Jinxian Huang","doi":"10.2147/PTT.S548700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To the best of our knowledge, no validated scoring instrument currently exists that comprehensively evaluates both cutaneous manifestations and systemic comorbidities of psoriasis. This multicenter study aimed to develop and validate a novel multidimensional scoring system addressing this clinical gap.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Under the guidance of the Shenzhen Psoriasis Academy, we conducted seven expert meetings to analyze existing evidence from PubMed, Wanfang, and CNKI databases. Through iterative Delphi consensus processes involving 26 specialists across 10 disciplines, we established the Psoriasis Disease Assessment Index (PSODAI). This 60-point composite instrument evaluates cutaneous involvement and nine key organ/system comorbidities. An accompanying online calculator (http://www.psodai.com.cn/) was developed for clinical implementation. Validation involved 254 psoriasis patients from six tertiary centers, with comparative analyses against PASI and DLQI metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PSODAI framework stratifies disease severity as mild (0-20), moderate (21-40), and severe (41-60). Comparative analysis revealed comparable proportions of moderate-to-severe cases between PSODAI and conventional tools (PASI/DLQI) (p>0.05). Notably, 11 patients (4.3%) classified as severe by PASI were re-categorized as mild through PSODAI's systemic evaluation, primarily due to limited extracutaneous manifestations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As the first comorbidity-integrated assessment tool, PSODAI enables cross-specialty collaboration for holistic patient management. Its clinical adoption may facilitate timely comorbidity detection and preventive interventions. Further multicenter validation is warranted to confirm these preliminary findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":74589,"journal":{"name":"Psoriasis (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"16 ","pages":"548700"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12927750/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psoriasis (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PTT.S548700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To the best of our knowledge, no validated scoring instrument currently exists that comprehensively evaluates both cutaneous manifestations and systemic comorbidities of psoriasis. This multicenter study aimed to develop and validate a novel multidimensional scoring system addressing this clinical gap.

Methods: Under the guidance of the Shenzhen Psoriasis Academy, we conducted seven expert meetings to analyze existing evidence from PubMed, Wanfang, and CNKI databases. Through iterative Delphi consensus processes involving 26 specialists across 10 disciplines, we established the Psoriasis Disease Assessment Index (PSODAI). This 60-point composite instrument evaluates cutaneous involvement and nine key organ/system comorbidities. An accompanying online calculator (http://www.psodai.com.cn/) was developed for clinical implementation. Validation involved 254 psoriasis patients from six tertiary centers, with comparative analyses against PASI and DLQI metrics.

Results: The PSODAI framework stratifies disease severity as mild (0-20), moderate (21-40), and severe (41-60). Comparative analysis revealed comparable proportions of moderate-to-severe cases between PSODAI and conventional tools (PASI/DLQI) (p>0.05). Notably, 11 patients (4.3%) classified as severe by PASI were re-categorized as mild through PSODAI's systemic evaluation, primarily due to limited extracutaneous manifestations.

Conclusion: As the first comorbidity-integrated assessment tool, PSODAI enables cross-specialty collaboration for holistic patient management. Its clinical adoption may facilitate timely comorbidity detection and preventive interventions. Further multicenter validation is warranted to confirm these preliminary findings.

银屑病评估指数(PSODAI)评分评价银屑病的全身累及。
背景:据我们所知,目前还没有有效的评分工具可以全面评估牛皮癣的皮肤表现和全身合并症。这项多中心研究旨在开发和验证一种新的多维评分系统,以解决这一临床差距。方法:在深圳市银屑病研究院的指导下,我们召开了7次专家会议,对PubMed、万方、CNKI数据库的现有证据进行分析。通过涉及10个学科的26位专家的反复德尔菲共识过程,我们建立了银屑病疾病评估指数(PSODAI)。这个60分的复合仪器评估皮肤受累和9个主要器官/系统合并症。开发了一个随附的在线计算器(http://www.psodai.com.cn/)用于临床实施。验证纳入了来自六个三级中心的254名银屑病患者,并对PASI和DLQI指标进行了比较分析。结果:PSODAI框架将疾病严重程度分为轻度(0-20)、中度(21-40)和重度(41-60)。比较分析显示PSODAI与常规工具(PASI/DLQI)的中重度病例比例相当(p < 0.05)。值得注意的是,通过PSODAI的系统评估,11例(4.3%)被PASI分类为重度的患者被重新分类为轻度,主要是由于有限的皮外表现。结论:作为首个综合合并症评估工具,PSODAI能够实现跨专业协作,实现患者的整体管理。它的临床应用可能有助于及时发现合并症和预防干预。进一步的多中心验证是必要的,以证实这些初步发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书