Free cessation aids and enhanced support for smoking cessation in disadvantaged smokers: a qualitative study of patient and provider insights.

IF 1.7
Paloma Vera, Maria Melchior, Djylal Badreddine, Marie-Noel Al Zayat, Gladys Ibanez, Melanie Böckmann, Fabienne El-Khoury
{"title":"Free cessation aids and enhanced support for smoking cessation in disadvantaged smokers: a qualitative study of patient and provider insights.","authors":"Paloma Vera, Maria Melchior, Djylal Badreddine, Marie-Noel Al Zayat, Gladys Ibanez, Melanie Böckmann, Fabienne El-Khoury","doi":"10.1017/S1463423626100942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore facilitators and barriers to smoking cessation among smokers experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage, from the perspectives of patients and healthcare providers (HP) participating in the STOP randomized controlled trial (STOP-RCT).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Smoking remains disproportionately prevalent among socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals, contributing to significant health disparities. The STOP-RCT evaluates a preference-based smoking cessation intervention offering free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and e-cigarettes to disadvantaged smokers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study was conducted involving semi-structured interviews with 14 participants and 5 HP from the STOP-RCT. Data collection explored participants' smoking cessation experiences, perceptions of the intervention, the quitting process, and the factors that influence cessation. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the transcribed data. Themes were categorized into structural and individual factors, refined iteratively, and supported by illustrative quotes.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Four key facilitators were identified: (1) longer consultations enabling tailored support; (2) regular follow-up promoting patient engagement; (3) immediate and free access to NRT and carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring, reducing financial and practical barriers while providing feedback; and (4) shared decision-making, strengthening trust and improving the fit of support. These findings highlight the importance of addressing both treatment approach (contextual) and interpersonal factors for this population. Considering these elements may help adapt cessation programmes to the specific difficulties and needs of patients with low socioeconomic position, thereby reinforcing treatment adherence and improving effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":74493,"journal":{"name":"Primary health care research & development","volume":"27 ","pages":"e27"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12951339/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary health care research & development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423626100942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To explore facilitators and barriers to smoking cessation among smokers experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage, from the perspectives of patients and healthcare providers (HP) participating in the STOP randomized controlled trial (STOP-RCT).

Background: Smoking remains disproportionately prevalent among socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals, contributing to significant health disparities. The STOP-RCT evaluates a preference-based smoking cessation intervention offering free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and e-cigarettes to disadvantaged smokers.

Methods: A qualitative study was conducted involving semi-structured interviews with 14 participants and 5 HP from the STOP-RCT. Data collection explored participants' smoking cessation experiences, perceptions of the intervention, the quitting process, and the factors that influence cessation. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the transcribed data. Themes were categorized into structural and individual factors, refined iteratively, and supported by illustrative quotes.

Findings: Four key facilitators were identified: (1) longer consultations enabling tailored support; (2) regular follow-up promoting patient engagement; (3) immediate and free access to NRT and carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring, reducing financial and practical barriers while providing feedback; and (4) shared decision-making, strengthening trust and improving the fit of support. These findings highlight the importance of addressing both treatment approach (contextual) and interpersonal factors for this population. Considering these elements may help adapt cessation programmes to the specific difficulties and needs of patients with low socioeconomic position, thereby reinforcing treatment adherence and improving effectiveness.

免费戒烟辅助和加强对弱势吸烟者戒烟的支持:对患者和提供者见解的定性研究。
目的:从参与STOP随机对照试验(STOP- rct)的患者和医疗保健提供者(HP)的角度,探讨社会经济劣势吸烟者戒烟的促进因素和障碍。背景:吸烟在社会经济上处于不利地位的个人中仍然不成比例地普遍,造成了重大的健康差距。STOP-RCT评估了一种基于偏好的戒烟干预措施,为弱势吸烟者提供免费的尼古丁替代疗法(NRT)和电子烟。方法:采用半结构化访谈对14名参与者和5名来自STOP-RCT的HP进行定性研究。数据收集探讨了参与者的戒烟经历、对干预的看法、戒烟过程以及影响戒烟的因素。采用主题分析法对转录数据进行分析。主题被分为结构因素和个体因素,经过反复提炼,并辅以说明性引用。研究发现:确定了四个关键的促进因素:(1)更长的咨询时间能够提供量身定制的支持;(2)定期随访,促进患者参与;(3)立即和免费获得NRT和一氧化碳(CO)监测,减少资金和实际障碍,同时提供反馈;(4)共同决策,增强信任,提高支持配合度。这些发现强调了解决这一人群的治疗方法(环境)和人际因素的重要性。考虑到这些因素可能有助于使戒烟规划适应社会经济地位低的患者的具体困难和需求,从而加强治疗依从性并提高有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书