Variation in the Management of Test Results after Hospital Discharge: A Pediatric Safety Concern.

IF 1.2 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Pediatric quality & safety Pub Date : 2026-02-23 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1097/pq9.0000000000000871
Meenu Krishnasamy, Rhiya Sharma, Lydia Nashed, Khoa Luong, Courtney Port
{"title":"Variation in the Management of Test Results after Hospital Discharge: A Pediatric Safety Concern.","authors":"Meenu Krishnasamy, Rhiya Sharma, Lydia Nashed, Khoa Luong, Courtney Port","doi":"10.1097/pq9.0000000000000871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Delay or failure to follow up tests pending at discharge (TPAD) is a major safety concern and a focus in the literature, but few studies exist in the pediatric context. We aimed to explore pediatric hospital medicine physicians' practices and perceptions of the management of TPAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Surveys were provided to hospitalists and residents at a single institution using selected questions from a published national adult primary care survey and newly developed questions. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Surveys were completed by 25 hospitalists (89%) and 25 residents (68%). Forty-four percent (n = 11) of hospitalists reported missing test results, yet only 18% (n = 2) agreed that this error led to a delay in care. Seventy-six percent (n = 19) of hospitalists reported lacking adequate assistance to manage TPAD. There is uncertainty about who is responsible for managing TPAD among 88% (n = 22) of hospitalists and 92% (n = 23) of residents. Hospitalists were more likely than residents to use cognitive reminders (72% versus 20%, <i>P</i> = 0.0005). Many hospitalists (80%, n = 20) and residents (80%, n = 20) agreed that TPAD management is a safety issue, and nearly all hospitalists (88%, n = 22) and residents (96%, n = 24) want a standardized process. Residents were more likely to desire a shared responsibility (68% versus 32%, <i>P</i> = 0.02). Only 56% (n = 14) of hospitalists had formal education in result management; 76% (n = 19) of residents desired training.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pediatric hospitalists and residents are concerned about TPAD management, and there is considerable variability in current practices. Developing a standard process is supported by nearly all.</p>","PeriodicalId":74412,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric quality & safety","volume":"11 1","pages":"e871"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12928903/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric quality & safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Delay or failure to follow up tests pending at discharge (TPAD) is a major safety concern and a focus in the literature, but few studies exist in the pediatric context. We aimed to explore pediatric hospital medicine physicians' practices and perceptions of the management of TPAD.

Methods: Surveys were provided to hospitalists and residents at a single institution using selected questions from a published national adult primary care survey and newly developed questions. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact tests.

Results: Surveys were completed by 25 hospitalists (89%) and 25 residents (68%). Forty-four percent (n = 11) of hospitalists reported missing test results, yet only 18% (n = 2) agreed that this error led to a delay in care. Seventy-six percent (n = 19) of hospitalists reported lacking adequate assistance to manage TPAD. There is uncertainty about who is responsible for managing TPAD among 88% (n = 22) of hospitalists and 92% (n = 23) of residents. Hospitalists were more likely than residents to use cognitive reminders (72% versus 20%, P = 0.0005). Many hospitalists (80%, n = 20) and residents (80%, n = 20) agreed that TPAD management is a safety issue, and nearly all hospitalists (88%, n = 22) and residents (96%, n = 24) want a standardized process. Residents were more likely to desire a shared responsibility (68% versus 32%, P = 0.02). Only 56% (n = 14) of hospitalists had formal education in result management; 76% (n = 19) of residents desired training.

Conclusions: Pediatric hospitalists and residents are concerned about TPAD management, and there is considerable variability in current practices. Developing a standard process is supported by nearly all.

出院后检测结果管理的差异:一个儿科安全问题。
出院时延迟或未能随访检查(TPAD)是一个主要的安全问题,也是文献关注的焦点,但在儿科方面的研究很少。我们的目的是探讨儿科医院医师对TPAD管理的做法和看法。方法:使用从已出版的全国成人初级保健调查和新开发的问题中选择的问题,向单一机构的医院医生和居民提供调查。使用描述性统计和Fisher精确检验对结果进行分析。结果:25名住院医师(89%)和25名住院医师(68%)完成了问卷调查。44% (n = 11)的医院医生报告缺少检测结果,但只有18% (n = 2)的人认为这一错误导致了护理延误。76% (n = 19)的医院医生报告缺乏足够的协助来管理TPAD。88% (n = 22)的医院医生和92% (n = 23)的居民对于谁负责管理TPAD存在不确定性。住院医生比住院医生更有可能使用认知提醒(72%对20%,P = 0.0005)。许多医院医生(80%,n = 20)和居民(80%,n = 20)认为TPAD管理是一个安全问题,几乎所有医院医生(88%,n = 22)和居民(96%,n = 24)都希望有一个标准化的流程。居民更有可能希望分担责任(68%对32%,P = 0.02)。只有56% (n = 14)的医院医生接受过结果管理方面的正规教育;76% (n = 19)的住院医师希望接受培训。结论:儿科医院医生和住院医师都很关注TPAD的管理,目前的实践存在相当大的差异。几乎所有人都支持开发标准流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书