Assessing the burden and inequality in the unmet need for hypertension and type 2 diabetes care using a care cascade framework in Tanzania, Lesotho, and South Africa.

IF 1.7
Denis Okova, Akim Tafadzwa Lukwa, Robinson Oyando, Folahanmi Tomiwa Akinsolu, Abodunrin Olunike, Plaxcedes Chiwire, Charles Hongoro
{"title":"Assessing the burden and inequality in the unmet need for hypertension and type 2 diabetes care using a care cascade framework in Tanzania, Lesotho, and South Africa.","authors":"Denis Okova, Akim Tafadzwa Lukwa, Robinson Oyando, Folahanmi Tomiwa Akinsolu, Abodunrin Olunike, Plaxcedes Chiwire, Charles Hongoro","doi":"10.1017/S1463423626100978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The rapidly growing burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in sub-Saharan Africa necessitates a better understanding of access gaps along the care continuum. This study assessed the prevalence and inequality in unmet need for hypertension and diabetes care in Tanzania, South Africa, and Lesotho using a care cascade framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of nationally representative Demographic Health Survey (DHS) datasets from Tanzania (2022), South Africa (2016), and Lesotho (2023/24), focusing on adults aged 15 years and older. The study estimated the proportion of adults with hypertension or diabetes who had not been screened, diagnosed, treated, or achieved disease control. Inequality was assessed using Erreygers Normalized Concentration Indices (ENCI), stratified by sex and residence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hypertension prevalence was 12.6% (95% CI: 11.7-13.4) in Tanzania, 46.7% (95% CI: 45.0-48.4) in South Africa, and 15.4% (95% CI: 13.8-17.2) in Lesotho. In Lesotho, 9.1% (95% CI: 7.8-10.6) of adults had diabetes. Unmet need was substantial across all countries: 96.5% for hypertension in Tanzania, 84.2% in South Africa, 65.8% in Lesotho, and 84.2% for diabetes in Lesotho. The care cascade framework revealed critical bottle-necks at screening and treatment stages. Inequality analyses revealed strong pro-poor gradients, particularly in screening (ENCIs: Tanzania -0.19, South Africa -0.17, Lesotho hypertension -0.15, Lesotho diabetes -0.24; all <i>p</i> < 0.01), with poor men experiencing the most disparities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Substantial and inequitable gaps exist in hypertension and diabetes care. Policy strategies should prioritize community-based screening, primary care integration, and equity-focused interventions targeting poor men to improve NCD outcomes in the region.</p>","PeriodicalId":74493,"journal":{"name":"Primary health care research & development","volume":"27 ","pages":"e28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12951333/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary health care research & development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423626100978","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The rapidly growing burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in sub-Saharan Africa necessitates a better understanding of access gaps along the care continuum. This study assessed the prevalence and inequality in unmet need for hypertension and diabetes care in Tanzania, South Africa, and Lesotho using a care cascade framework.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of nationally representative Demographic Health Survey (DHS) datasets from Tanzania (2022), South Africa (2016), and Lesotho (2023/24), focusing on adults aged 15 years and older. The study estimated the proportion of adults with hypertension or diabetes who had not been screened, diagnosed, treated, or achieved disease control. Inequality was assessed using Erreygers Normalized Concentration Indices (ENCI), stratified by sex and residence.

Results: Hypertension prevalence was 12.6% (95% CI: 11.7-13.4) in Tanzania, 46.7% (95% CI: 45.0-48.4) in South Africa, and 15.4% (95% CI: 13.8-17.2) in Lesotho. In Lesotho, 9.1% (95% CI: 7.8-10.6) of adults had diabetes. Unmet need was substantial across all countries: 96.5% for hypertension in Tanzania, 84.2% in South Africa, 65.8% in Lesotho, and 84.2% for diabetes in Lesotho. The care cascade framework revealed critical bottle-necks at screening and treatment stages. Inequality analyses revealed strong pro-poor gradients, particularly in screening (ENCIs: Tanzania -0.19, South Africa -0.17, Lesotho hypertension -0.15, Lesotho diabetes -0.24; all p < 0.01), with poor men experiencing the most disparities.

Conclusion: Substantial and inequitable gaps exist in hypertension and diabetes care. Policy strategies should prioritize community-based screening, primary care integration, and equity-focused interventions targeting poor men to improve NCD outcomes in the region.

利用护理级联框架评估坦桑尼亚、莱索托和南非高血压和2型糖尿病未满足需求的负担和不平等
背景:撒哈拉以南非洲的非传染性疾病负担迅速增加,因此有必要更好地了解护理连续体中的获取差距。本研究使用护理级联框架评估了坦桑尼亚、南非和莱索托高血压和糖尿病护理未满足需求的患病率和不平等。方法:我们对坦桑尼亚(2022年)、南非(2016年)和莱索托(2023/24年)具有全国代表性的人口健康调查(DHS)数据集进行了横断面分析,重点关注15岁及以上的成年人。该研究估计了未接受筛查、诊断、治疗或疾病控制的高血压或糖尿病成年人的比例。使用Erreygers标准化浓度指数(ENCI)评估不平等,按性别和居住地分层。结果:坦桑尼亚的高血压患病率为12.6% (95% CI: 11.7-13.4),南非为46.7% (95% CI: 45.0-48.4),莱索托为15.4% (95% CI: 13.8-17.2)。在莱索托,9.1% (95% CI: 7.8-10.6)的成年人患有糖尿病。所有国家的未满足需求都很大:坦桑尼亚的高血压需求为96.5%,南非为84.2%,莱索托为65.8%,莱索托为84.2%。护理级联框架揭示了筛查和治疗阶段的关键瓶颈。不平等分析显示了强烈的有利于穷人的梯度,特别是在筛查方面(ENCIs:坦桑尼亚-0.19,南非-0.17,莱索托高血压-0.15,莱索托糖尿病-0.24,均p < 0.01),其中穷人的差异最大。结论:高血压和糖尿病的护理存在着大量不公平的差距。政策战略应优先考虑以社区为基础的筛查、初级保健整合和针对贫困男性的以公平为重点的干预措施,以改善该地区的非传染性疾病结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书